First Two Planet X SPT Leaked

Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:48 am » by **Acee22**

First Two Planet X SPT Leaked Image Videos by NibiruShock2012 Now Seen as Highly CredibleThis series of articles and the supporting video represent a culmination of a 7-week study that began with NibiruShock2012's release of the Nibiru/Planet X photos taken January 2008 video on YouTube on February 20, 2008. Until today, our steady assessment of those images, plus those appearing in a second video by the same director, has been that of "compelling."

With the publication of this final study, we are now elevating that assessment from "compelling" to "highly credible." What prompts us to make this claim is the massive, highly successful government disinformation campaign waged against these two important disclosure videos by NibiruShock2012.
[youtube]6j-Zg4bRjp0&feature[/youtube]
To help put all this information in perspective, the following narrative is supported by highly revealing statisitcal analyses based on YouTube audience metrics.
http://yowusa.com/planetx/2008/planetx-2008-04a/1.shtml

We further believe that NibiruShock2012's latest video is a sophisticated disinformation ploy that has been presented as a hoax in order to quell any further public discussion. These specific findings are detailed in the reports by Janice Manning and Jacco van der Worp, MSc.
Why NibiruShock2012's First Images
are Now Seen as Highly Credible

Consequently, the depth of this clamp-down on the NibiruShock2012 images is stunning, in both magnitude and scope. Therefore, the principle reason for this status upgrade can be be summed up by former US President Richard Nixon, "it's not the crime that kills you; it's the cover-up."

The following video summary explains then general history of this study and how we achieved our study findings.

Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:38 am » by **Punjedi**

So, basically, their "analysis" according to that link is...

because more Youtubers liked the video, they changed it from compelling to credible....

ok.

Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:54 am » by **Redwoodrick**

punjedi wrote:So, basically, their "analysis" according to that link is...

because more Youtubers liked the video, they changed it from compelling to credible....

ok.

Exactly

Sound official and important but have nothing to say.

Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:12 am » by **Roadkill**

redwoodrick wrote:
punjedi wrote:So, basically, their "analysis" according to that link is...

because more Youtubers liked the video, they changed it from compelling to credible....

ok.

Exactly
Sound official and important but have nothing to say.

Sounds like a republicant.