Food for thought.

Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:56 pm » by **Chris333**

The only way of finding the limits of the possible is by going beyond them into the impossible. To go further if the impossible is needed to define the possible then i think i can say with a certain level of confidence that anything is possible. :think:

Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:11 am » by **Chris333**

To go further atoms react to being observed by a human, a proven fact, everything in this world is made of atoms, kind of makes you think.

Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:12 am » by **Freeyourmindnow**

chris333 wrote:To go further atoms react to being observed by a human, a proven fact, everything in this world is made of atoms, kind of makes you think.

yep all the time man all the time :think:

Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:12 am » by **Chris333**

freeyourmindnow wrote:
chris333 wrote:To go further atoms react to being observed by a human, a proven fact, everything in this world is made of atoms, kind of makes you think.

yep all the time man all the time

Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:19 am » by **Nyarelathodep**

Take a look at fractals sometime, if you havent Chris. That will provoke some serious thought...Nova had a good special on it once..I believe it was also posted on this site. I beleive it was called "The hunt for hidden dimensions"...Atoms are massive structures when compared to the constiuent particles which in turn make them up, down to quarks and possibly (probably) even smaller. They say that if an Atom was exploded to the size of our solar system, a quark would be the size of a tree here on earth. And its this level of quanta that does not behave in accordance to the rest of what we concieve to be "universal" laws of physics, but rather seems to predicate its behaivoir more in line with thought intent. Lynn McTaggert's "the field" is a great book on this type of stuff, chock full of imperical, repeatable experiments (and "The Intention Experiment" as well) illustrating these points.

Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:56 am » by **Chris333**

nyarelathodep wrote:Take a look at fractals sometime, if you havent Chris. That will provoke some serious thought...Nova had a good special on it once..I believe it was also posted on this site. I beleive it was called "The hunt for hidden dimensions"...Atoms are massive structures when compared to the constiuent particles which in turn make them up, down to quarks and possibly (probably) even smaller. They say that if an Atom was exploded to the size of our solar system, a quark would be the size of a tree here on earth. And its this level of quanta that does not behave in accordance to the rest of what we concieve to be "universal" laws of physics, but rather seems to predicate its behaivoir more in line with thought intent. Lynn McTaggert's "the field" is a great book on this type of stuff, chock full of imperical, repeatable experiments (and "The Intention Experiment" as well) illustrating these points.

Fantastic thanks. :flop:

Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:02 am » by **Nyarelathodep**

I find it funny you decided to rescind your comment on this thread, Icarium. Trying a little damage control for your allready self-tarnished image?

Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:08 am » by **Chris333**

nyarelathodep wrote:I find it funny you decided to rescind your comment on this thread, Icarium. Trying a little damage control for your allready self-tarnished image?

WTF? not a clue i have of what you say.?

Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:23 am » by **Icarium**

No I withdrew it because I thought it was rude and unnecessary on an unrelated post, seeing as how you mention it....but hey fuck the high road.

Hmmmmmm Emperical, repeatable......glad to see you are learning now apply it to Icke.,
See I told you I would be here if you wrote something sensible and original , hey I am even skipping your spelling and letting your woeful understanding of sub atomic particles slide. 6/10 for effort but could do better..

Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:19 am » by **Nyarelathodep**

icarium wrote:No I withdrew it because I thought it was rude and unnecessary on an unrelated post, seeing as how you mention it....but hey fuck the high road.

Hmmmmmm Emperical, repeatable......glad to see you are learning now apply it to Icke.,
See I told you I would be here if you wrote something sensible and original , hey I am even skipping your spelling and letting your woeful understanding of sub atomic particles slide. 6/10 for effort but could do better..

If you had any conception of the high road, you wouldnt have followed me to an unrelated post to give me your ego-inflated opinion in the first place. And with that, Im done with you.