Funny Things Evolutionists Say!
15 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
- Truthdefender

-
- Posts: 1906
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:31 pm
You might like:
But first a reasonable observation:
"I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it's been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has."
-Malcolm Muggeridge (world famous journalist and philosopher), Pascal Lectures, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
And now the experts:
In fact, Dr. Lyall Watson once stated the following....
"The fossils that decorate our family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens. The remarkable fact is that all of the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin!"
For example, a 1994 article in Time Magazine (which is radically pro-evolution) made the following stunning statement....
"Yet despite more than a century of digging, the fossil record remains maddeningly sparse. With so few clues, even a single bone that doesn't fit into the picture can upset everything. Virtually every major discovery has put deep cracks in the conventional wisdom and forced scientists to concoct new theories, amid furious debate."
"I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualize such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it, and if I were to leave it to artistic license, would that not mislead the reader?"
-Dr. Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History (and a hardcore evolutionist), in a letter to Luther Sunderland, April 10, 1979.
"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution."
Stephen Jay Gould (Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University), "Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging?" Paleobiology, vol. 6(1), January 1980, p. 127
"Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory."
Ronald R. West, PhD (paleoecology and geology) (Assistant Professor of Paleobiology at Kansas State University), "Paleoecology and uniformitarianism". Compass, vol. 45, May 1968, p. 216
"Lastly, looking not to any one time, but to all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed. But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?"
-Charles Darwin
"In fact, the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another."
-Evolutionist Stephen M. Stanley, Johns Hopkins University
"The earliest and most primitive members of every order already have the basic ordinal characters, and in no case is an approximately continuous series from one order to another known. In most cases the break is so sharp and the gap so large that the origin of the order is speculative and much disputed"
-Paleontologist George Gaylord
A major problem in proving the theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth's geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin's hypothetical intermediate variants - instead species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist argument that each species was created by God.
-Paleontologist Mark Czarnecki (an evolutionist)
"It is as though they [fossils] were just planted there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to say this appearance of sudden planting has delighted creationists. Both schools of thought (Punctuationists and Gradualists) despise so-called scientific creationists equally, and both agree that the major gaps are real, that they are true imperfections in the fossil record. The only alternative explanation of the sudden appearance of so many complex animal types in the Cambrian era is divine creation and both reject this alternative."
-Richard Dawkins, 'The Blind Watchmaker', W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1996, pp. 229-230
Creationists sum it up best:
Today the population grows at 2% per year. If we set the population growth rate at just 0.5% per year, then total population reduces to zero at about 4500 years ago. If the first humans lived 1,000,000 years ago, then at this 0.5% growth rate, we would have 10^2100 (ten with 2100 zeroes following it) people right now. If the present population was a result of 1,000,000 years of human history, then several trillion people must have lived and died since the emergence of our species. Where are all the bones? And finally, if the population was sufficiently small until only recently, then how could a correspondingly infinitesimally small number of mutations have evolved the human race?
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact."
-Dr. T. N. Tahmisian (Atomic Energy Commission, USA) in "The Fresno Bee", August 20, 1959. As quoted by N. J. Mitchell, Evolution and the Emperor's New Clothes, Roydon Publications, UK, 1983, title page.
"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."
-Professor Louis Bounoure, past president of the Biological Society of Strassbourg, Director of the Strassbourg Zoological Museum and Director of Research at the French National Center of Scientific Research.
http://signsofthelastdays.com/archives/ ... -evolution
"I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it's been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has."
-Malcolm Muggeridge (world famous journalist and philosopher), Pascal Lectures, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
And now the experts:
In fact, Dr. Lyall Watson once stated the following....
"The fossils that decorate our family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens. The remarkable fact is that all of the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin!"
For example, a 1994 article in Time Magazine (which is radically pro-evolution) made the following stunning statement....
"Yet despite more than a century of digging, the fossil record remains maddeningly sparse. With so few clues, even a single bone that doesn't fit into the picture can upset everything. Virtually every major discovery has put deep cracks in the conventional wisdom and forced scientists to concoct new theories, amid furious debate."
"I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualize such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it, and if I were to leave it to artistic license, would that not mislead the reader?"
-Dr. Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History (and a hardcore evolutionist), in a letter to Luther Sunderland, April 10, 1979.
"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution."
Stephen Jay Gould (Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University), "Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging?" Paleobiology, vol. 6(1), January 1980, p. 127
"Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory."
Ronald R. West, PhD (paleoecology and geology) (Assistant Professor of Paleobiology at Kansas State University), "Paleoecology and uniformitarianism". Compass, vol. 45, May 1968, p. 216
"Lastly, looking not to any one time, but to all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed. But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?"
-Charles Darwin
"In fact, the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another."
-Evolutionist Stephen M. Stanley, Johns Hopkins University
"The earliest and most primitive members of every order already have the basic ordinal characters, and in no case is an approximately continuous series from one order to another known. In most cases the break is so sharp and the gap so large that the origin of the order is speculative and much disputed"
-Paleontologist George Gaylord
A major problem in proving the theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth's geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin's hypothetical intermediate variants - instead species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist argument that each species was created by God.
-Paleontologist Mark Czarnecki (an evolutionist)
"It is as though they [fossils] were just planted there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to say this appearance of sudden planting has delighted creationists. Both schools of thought (Punctuationists and Gradualists) despise so-called scientific creationists equally, and both agree that the major gaps are real, that they are true imperfections in the fossil record. The only alternative explanation of the sudden appearance of so many complex animal types in the Cambrian era is divine creation and both reject this alternative."
-Richard Dawkins, 'The Blind Watchmaker', W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1996, pp. 229-230
Creationists sum it up best:
Today the population grows at 2% per year. If we set the population growth rate at just 0.5% per year, then total population reduces to zero at about 4500 years ago. If the first humans lived 1,000,000 years ago, then at this 0.5% growth rate, we would have 10^2100 (ten with 2100 zeroes following it) people right now. If the present population was a result of 1,000,000 years of human history, then several trillion people must have lived and died since the emergence of our species. Where are all the bones? And finally, if the population was sufficiently small until only recently, then how could a correspondingly infinitesimally small number of mutations have evolved the human race?
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact."
-Dr. T. N. Tahmisian (Atomic Energy Commission, USA) in "The Fresno Bee", August 20, 1959. As quoted by N. J. Mitchell, Evolution and the Emperor's New Clothes, Roydon Publications, UK, 1983, title page.
"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."
-Professor Louis Bounoure, past president of the Biological Society of Strassbourg, Director of the Strassbourg Zoological Museum and Director of Research at the French National Center of Scientific Research.
http://signsofthelastdays.com/archives/ ... -evolution
To know the peace of God,
One must know the God of Peace.
Pursue Jesus Christ,
He's pursuing you!
"All our intelligence is dumbing us down to a great extent."--Iwanci
One must know the God of Peace.
Pursue Jesus Christ,
He's pursuing you!
"All our intelligence is dumbing us down to a great extent."--Iwanci
- Troll2rocks

-
- Posts: 6420
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:03 pm
- Location: YOU ALL FLOAT DOWN HERE
Funny Things Evolutionists Say!
Why do creationists always look really un-evolved ?
Bill Hicks

Evolutionist? Creationist?
Both wrong!
You were created as slaves for the superior race... ffs how hard is that to understand? Why you digging the ground for proof of something when the answer is everywhere around you.
Both wrong!
You were created as slaves for the superior race... ffs how hard is that to understand? Why you digging the ground for proof of something when the answer is everywhere around you.
evidence of what,otoel? that you're fucking certifiably insane? you watch a children's show,and analyze it,for hours then in your spare time,you give distorted scripture studies for a bunch of losers on the interweb.-Boon
- Troll2rocks

-
- Posts: 6420
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:03 pm
- Location: YOU ALL FLOAT DOWN HERE
otoel wrote:Evolutionist? Creationist?
Both wrong!
You were created as slaves for the superior race... ffs how hard is that to understand? Why you digging the ground for proof of something when the answer is everywhere around you.
Is it ? Care to share that answer to the unenlightened ?
Oh wait, Selena Gomez yes ? devils on her knees etc ?


troll2rocks wrote:otoel wrote:Evolutionist? Creationist?
Both wrong!
You were created as slaves for the superior race... ffs how hard is that to understand? Why you digging the ground for proof of something when the answer is everywhere around you.
Is it ? Care to share that answer to the unenlightened ?
Oh wait, Selena Gomez yes ? devils on her knees etc ?
![]()
I have no idea what you are talking about, perhaps removing that cock out of your anus should increase the chance for you to think clearly.
evidence of what,otoel? that you're fucking certifiably insane? you watch a children's show,and analyze it,for hours then in your spare time,you give distorted scripture studies for a bunch of losers on the interweb.-Boon
- Troll2rocks

-
- Posts: 6420
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:03 pm
- Location: YOU ALL FLOAT DOWN HERE
otoel wrote:troll2rocks wrote:otoel wrote:Evolutionist? Creationist?
Both wrong!
You were created as slaves for the superior race... ffs how hard is that to understand? Why you digging the ground for proof of something when the answer is everywhere around you.
Is it ? Care to share that answer to the unenlightened ?
Oh wait, Selena Gomez yes ? devils on her knees etc ?
![]()
I have no idea what you are talking about, perhaps removing that cock out of your anus should increase the chance for you to think clearly.
I highlighted the section for you, so you could better grasp it
Also, are you hitting on me Bieber ?


What do you do for a living Troll2cocks?
Why do you work?
What is your`s life goal?
Is the answer to all of these questions simply "I am a slave"?
There is your proof.
Why do you work?
What is your`s life goal?
Is the answer to all of these questions simply "I am a slave"?
There is your proof.
evidence of what,otoel? that you're fucking certifiably insane? you watch a children's show,and analyze it,for hours then in your spare time,you give distorted scripture studies for a bunch of losers on the interweb.-Boon
- Truthdefender

-
- Posts: 1906
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:31 pm
I forgot this one:
from Francis Crick:
[i]"Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved." [/i]
Oh yeah, and this one:
Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins writes,
"Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose."
from Francis Crick:
[i]"Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved." [/i]
Oh yeah, and this one:
Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins writes,
"Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose."
To know the peace of God,
One must know the God of Peace.
Pursue Jesus Christ,
He's pursuing you!
"All our intelligence is dumbing us down to a great extent."--Iwanci
One must know the God of Peace.
Pursue Jesus Christ,
He's pursuing you!
"All our intelligence is dumbing us down to a great extent."--Iwanci
15 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Evolutionists are at it again! EXPLANATION FOR GENDER!
1, 2, 3, 4, 5by otoel » Fri Jul 08, 2011 2:31 am - 41 Replies
- 583 Views
- Last post by realorfake

Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:12 am
- Evolutionists are at it again! EXPLANATION FOR GENDER!
-
- End Of Ze World, very funny
by freeyourmindnow » Sat Apr 23, 2011 6:26 pm - 8 Replies
- 572 Views
- Last post by freeyourmindnow

Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:06 am
- End Of Ze World, very funny
-
- A funny exemple of how brain's content becomes intellectual
by tertiusgaudens » Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:10 pm - 0 Replies
- 120 Views
- Last post by tertiusgaudens

Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:10 pm
- A funny exemple of how brain's content becomes intellectual
-
- Things falling from the sky
by animus131 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:34 am - 1 Replies
- 421 Views
- Last post by wyldkat

Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:55 am
- Things falling from the sky
-
- Don't be negative about things
by raburgeson » Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:14 pm - 0 Replies
- 126 Views
- Last post by raburgeson

Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:14 pm
- Don't be negative about things






