Gandhi Used His Position To Sexually Exploit Young Women...

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3766
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:58 am

PostTue Apr 08, 2014 4:05 am » by Megame23


Rumpleforeskin wrote:Good to see some ghost just cant stay away.
:cheers:


have to pop in from time to time :D
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." ~Edmund Burke

Conspirator
Online
User avatar
Posts: 8094
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostTue Apr 08, 2014 4:57 am » by Malogg


Noentry wrote:As for the alegation he was racist,

As a young Indian from a cast system he was,
After his stint in prison and his years in South Africa he grew out of his racist doctrines.

It is no secret that when Gandhi first arrived in South Africa as a 24 year old young lawyer, he was cocky and ignorant. He believed that the whites had the right to be predominant. And he believed that the Blacks were a race beneath the Indians. After all, he grew up in the Caste system of India which is all about hierarchy.

However, through his experience in South Africa and his stint in prison, his views about race gradually changed. By all accounts he did not die with any racist views. Many South African scholars of all races, today honor Gandhi as a major contributor to the civil rights of all peoples in South Africa. They do so not because they don't know about his earlier racist views. They do so because they are able to see past his youth and analyse his contribution to history in the grand scheme of things.

Nobody is born perfect. Many of you armchair critics, once held very primitive points of view. But that should not be held against you to the day you die. Not if you have since revised those primitive views of yours.


Malogg right now you are working for the enemy, man dont you see it?


So he was a racist at one point yeap folks change but as proved by Gandhi's own words that he was for child marriage which prolly was seen as normal to him as he was conformed to believe it was normal but it is still peadophilia no way around that one

As for working for the enemy nah Ima work for no fecker even today countries believe it is ok to bugger children when it is not. . .

Even our own crown is implicated in peadophilia as if it was not true then why are these folk that have stated that of the crown not been tried in a court of law or imprisoned or hanged for high treason

Gandhi was a great man on one side of the rock but to this side of the rock he was a nobody and today he is idolized when rightfully so for his achievements were outstanding to Goliath many to this day but Ima nae put him on no fkn grounds as half as great as William the Lion of Scotland now that is a fkn conspiracy to wipe out all about the man when he was the reason that Scotland and England had peace for a while in a time of real bloodshed only for it to be ruined by later Kings of England and Scotland but without William the UN would never have come into existence which in his day was a far more greater achievement than anything Gandhi did in his life time yeap fkn truth is William was also fkn delusional and believed he was Alexander the great reincarnated but that is another non fact although we do have proof William took the seal of the lion from Alexander as he believed he was Gods chosen one which once again was delusional lmao

Many other great men have lived and shall live if these morons in power do not see that WAR is not the way and that is what Gandhi did eventually bring to lives great table

Nevermind that the fact is Gandhi changed his ideas about racism and leaves one to wonder if not he could have changed his views apon child marriage but that Ima doubt but who knows as Gandhi was taken cut short from lives great river still an awesome man and that is all he was but a man

We daft humans need leaders throughout history we chose the virtuous only to be let down by our own blindness to follow fools to dictate the very rivers of our lives sad when you think about it how blinkered a species we really are eh. . .


:cheers:
Do the world a favor and kill yourself asshole. Kill yourself and stop wasting our air. ~ *WillEase* LARGO

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 8575
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:52 pm

PostTue Apr 08, 2014 5:04 am » by Noentry


Malogg wrote:
So he was a racist at one point yeap folks change but as proved by Gandhi's own words that he was for child marriage which prolly was seen as normal to him as he was conformed to believe it was normal but it is still peadophilia no way around that one

As for working for the enemy nah Ima work for no fecker even today countries believe it is ok to bugger children when it is not. . .

Even our own crown is implicated in peadophilia as if it was not true then why are these folk that have stated that of the crown not been tried in a court of law or imprisoned or hanged for high treason

Gandhi was a great man on one side of the rock but to this side of the rock he was a nobody and today he is idolized when rightfully so for his achievements were outstanding to Goliath many to this day but Ima nae put him on no fkn grounds as half as great as William the Lion of Scotland now that is a fkn conspiracy to wipe out all about the man when he was the reason that Scotland and England had peace for a while in a time of real bloodshed only for it to be ruined by later Kings of England and Scotland but without William the UN would never have come into existence which in his day was a far more greater achievement than anything Gandhi did in his life time yeap fkn truth is William was also fkn delusional and believed he was Alexander the great reincarnated but that is another non fact although we do have proof William took the seal of the lion from Alexander as he believed he was Gods chosen one which once again was delusional lmao

Many other great men have lived and shall live if these morons in power do not see that WAR is not the way and that is what Gandhi did eventually bring to lives great table

Nevermind that the fact is Gandhi changed his ideas about racism and leaves one to wonder if not he could have changed his views apon child marriage but that Ima doubt but who knows as Gandhi was taken cut short from lives great river still an awesome man and that is all he was but a man

We daft humans need leaders throughout history we chose the virtuous only to be let down by our own blindness to follow fools to dictate the very rivers of our lives sad when you think about it how blinkered a species we really are eh. . .


:cheers:


:cheers:

Do you know Gandhi was married at 13?
For him it was normal.
Again I state in today's society it is wrong when he was doing it was acceptable in his country and his culture, well not just his, Children getting married was going on all over the world.
"The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority.
The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority.
The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking."
A. A. Milne

Conspirator
Online
User avatar
Posts: 8094
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostTue Apr 08, 2014 5:11 am » by Malogg


Yeap but in this day and age there aint no reason for such unless you are totally off grid as in a jungle bunny that has never known what modern rule of society is all about
Do the world a favor and kill yourself asshole. Kill yourself and stop wasting our air. ~ *WillEase* LARGO

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:37 pm

PostTue Apr 08, 2014 7:32 am » by Tntbw


I consider this entire heated thread an insult to Ben Kingsley. :lol:

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7369
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:05 pm
Location: ON A GIF: HUNT

PostTue Apr 08, 2014 9:05 am » by Fatdogmendoza


So at what explicit moment in time did it become ''not acceptable'' to shag or use children as a litmus test for your sexual habitude..Who made that decision? because that now seems to almost be the general consensus in much of the modern world..Who had the right to change a practice was was acceptable, even encouraged? Pederasty and Paedophilia in their copacetic forms seems to me to be a contradiction in terms.

Any way I thought that we could only judge on what we know rather than what we think we know, and today we know that pedophilia is wrong and harms the physical and mental development of children.

And it is an abhorrent practice.

Conspirator
Online
User avatar
Posts: 8094
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostTue Apr 08, 2014 10:53 am » by Malogg


Fatdogmendoza wrote:So at what explicit moment in time did it become ''not acceptable'' to shag or use children as a litmus test for your sexual habitude..Who made that decision? because that now seems to almost be the general consensus in much of the modern world..Who had the right to change a practice was was acceptable, even encouraged? Pederasty and Paedophilia in their copacetic forms seems to me to be a contradiction in terms.

Any way I thought that we could only judge on what we know rather than what we think we know, and today we know that pedophilia is wrong and harms the physical and mental development of children.

And it is an abhorrent practice.



Exactly eh


Image
Do the world a favor and kill yourself asshole. Kill yourself and stop wasting our air. ~ *WillEase* LARGO

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9695
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostTue Apr 08, 2014 11:15 am » by *WillEase*


Malogg wrote:LMAO Willis Ima far from it your attitude towards anti child abuse speaks for what you truly are

PRO CHILD ABUSE is what you are if you are not against it

FACT :wink:

PS Ima spent the last 5 to 6 years exposing fkn peadophiles what have you done yeap expose space fluff




Pedophilia is one of the most serious charges that can be leveled against a person, so the term "pedophile" should not be used lightly. We must also remember that, if a man has a sexual relationship with a young girl in a culture where such a union is permissible, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the man is a "sexual predator," as the term "pedophile" implies. And if you spent years exposing pedophiles, good for you. But you have not proven that Gandhi had sex with children...nor will you ever be able to.
It is a historical fact that Muhammad was a pedophile. Where is your rant about him?

Conspirator
Online
User avatar
Posts: 8094
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
Location: Next door

PostTue Apr 08, 2014 8:52 pm » by Malogg


UK database for sex offences against children
1 hr ·

FIRST we need to get the terminology right — They are child abuse images or indecent images of children. It is NOT child pornography: every photograph depicts a real child being sexually abused.

Every picture is a crime scene where a real child is being abused or sexually exploited !

In the last two years nearly 35 million child abuse images have been confiscated in England and Wales.

The pictures are graded from level one – the lowest – to category five, which involves sadism, torture and rape. Many of the pictures involve children under 10 including babies

The COPINE Scale is a rating system created in Ireland and used in the United Kingdom to categorise the severity of images of child sex abuse, and thus use in the sentencing of offenders in a UK court of law.

In looking at the nature of the material the Sentencing Council has categorised such material into five levels of seriousness with level five being the most serious.

Level one: Images of erotic posing, with no sexual activity;

Level two: Non-penetrative sexual activities between children, or solo masturbation by a child;

Level three: Non-penetrative sexual activity between adults and children;

Level four: Penetrative sexual activity involving a child or children, or both children and adults;

Level five: Sadism, Torture, Rape or involving the penetration of, or by, an animal.

The age of the child is now an aggravating factor and police officers should be encouraged to ensure that images are divided not only according to the categories set out above, but also as to whether the child is under 13 years, or 13 – 15 years and 16 – 17 years old.

When dealing with cases involving thousands of images police officers have approached the CPS in order to determine at what point they can stop looking at images. It is a matter for the police to decide how many images to view. If the police decide not to view all the images that is a risk analysis only they are able to take.

There is of course always the danger that if only 1,000 images out of 500,000 are viewed that image 1001 may show the suspect abusing a child.
Image


This is reason enough for what Chris Wittwer and co are doing

Chris may be a lad a real top Ehglish bloke that has been on the wrong side of the law in the past but has learned from it but the anger within some folk whom were victims need to release this through some sort of sport or activity lol Ima know all to well but FFS the man is the most caring a person can be when it comes to fighting against child abuse

Ima take my hat off to Chris and the folks that remain anon to bring this a reality saving children by educating the nation and waking folks up to see what must be done and that is educating mothers fathers aunties uncles sisters brothers families to prevent and how to cope with the HELL of it all
for good reason

:clapper:

Wonder what Gandhi would think of this if he lived in our age time and not back then

:think:

Do the world a favor and kill yourself asshole. Kill yourself and stop wasting our air. ~ *WillEase* LARGO

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:02 pm

PostWed Apr 09, 2014 9:19 pm » by Giovanni


this gif is little bit disturbing, but that's what the parents do. if its a Girl
Image

the problem is the parents :shooting:


Previous

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook