Published on Oct 10, 2012 by corbettreport
Peter Kirby, author of Chemtrails Exposed, joins us to discuss the chemtrailing agenda, and how weather modification has been exploited by well-connected insiders for financial gain. We also talk about the military applications of this technology and how the Department of Defense has been working on it behind the scenes for decades now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2rgWsv2 ... ture=g-u-u
....i'm putting malogg's (thanks mal) recent video in here.........this ''is'' global...
Published on Sep 24, 2012 by FreeTruthShow
SKYWATCHERS UNITE. Update on the brave efforts of Swedish Green Party politician Pernilla Hagberg to raise the issue of Chemtrails to the public.
VIDEO INTERVIEW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXer7kZeOAw
Facebook group http://www.facebook.com/groups/117763471707274/
G.S.O.C. GO SWEDEN ON CHEMTRAILS
Please join my Facebook group to support this lady. One of the first politicians in history to publicly address the issue of Chemtrails. Please send messages of support to her at Pernilla.Hagberg@yahoo.com and also show your support for her by emailing the Swedish embassy in your country and the Swedish Green Party.
We have been complaining for years that no politicians address this so now is the chance to show how much we really care about our children and our environment, for real. Click like and subscribe and share the group and related videos also.
This situation could lead to heights even we can't imagine.
If the Swedish mainstream media are forced to address this then the Swedish public, (who are an extremely conscious environmentalist people), realise what is happening who knows where this might lead. It could snowball to a critical mass. What we've been hoping for for many years.
We've always known that if enough people knew about Chemtrails and H.A.A.R.P. then it could be stopped.
Now is your chance. Take it.
patrick lynch PUBLIC TALK ON CHEMTRAILS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3VvXOkCI4k
Thank you to host alex hunter of the ADVANCED ACTIVIST ADVISORY on TheseChangingTimezRadio.ning.com for having me as a guest on his broadcast. See alex hunter Facebook or Jokertattooo on YouTube.
ROYAL AIR FORCE SPOKEN TO ON CHEMTRAILS
patrick lynch reports on Swedish Politicians Speaks Out On Chemtrails
http://theintelhub.com/2012/09/24/swedi ... about-ch...
http://aircrap.org/politicians-cia-inje ... ment-50104
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AykLfHtM ... r_embedded
The Budget Obama Didn’t Want You To Know About !.
Geoengineering has now been defined as: “the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment to counteract anthropogenic climate change.” – The Royal Society 2009
Recently, the question has been asked, What In the World Are They Spraying? The documentary with the same name answers many of those questions.
The question the world is now asking is: Who in the world is spraying us? Now exposed in the new film Shade the Motion Picture.
The world is now demanding accountability.
As an introduction to this article, we will first cover information to familiarize the uninformed readers as to the core facts and information so that a more complete understanding is possible, given this complex issue.
A recent report by CBS Atlanta detailed how some local citizens are outraged that such “crimes against humanity” are being carried out right before our eyes in secret.
In the report Sen. Johnny Isakson was interviewed on the subject of chemtrails saying quote:
“That is a theory that some people have, but there is no evidence this is happening. This is not happening.”
It looks as if members of the government’s upper echelon and even members of the Senate will go to extreme lengths to suppress this vital information from reaching the American people.
(Ad) New Documentary Shows Who’s Behind These Sinister Geoengineering Activities
Not to mention they signed off on the multi-billion dollar per year budgets in an economic crisis, with little to no transparency to the public.
In regards to aerosol spraying into the earth’s atmosphere, a recent update to data assembled by The Carnicom Institute reveals the chemicals used and their respective levels of concentration. The toxic levels that are being used in these aerosols goes beyond shocking – it would appear that these levels are indeed criminal by EPA Standards.
An Updated Look at Aerosol Toxins – Part 1
By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri
February 3, 2011
(Excerpt from Report)
A new preliminary draft report by ArizonaSkyWatch shows dramatic increases in heavy metals that simply do not belong in our air. NOTE: The level of Manganese is so shockingly high that ArizonaSkyWatch also included additional information about it (see below). This report will be posted online shortly.
This is only a preliminary overview of Arizona Air Particulates.
2010 Air Particulates
These figures indicate how many times they are over the allowable toxic limit:
Additional Research & Videos are at the CaliforniaSkyWatch.com & theAgricultureDefenseCoalition.org.
Interestingly enough, Monsanto has just released an Aluminum Resistant Seed which is Genetically Modified to tolerate Aluminum in high levels in the soil. Is this a coincidence, or do they know something?
“Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.” – Henry Kissinger
See also: Henry Kissinger National Security Study Memorandum 200
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” – Richard Haass- Club of Rome
Another famous quote;
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government. - Thomas Jefferson
The Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER) exists to accelerate the innovative development and evaluation of science and technology to address carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions and their environmental consequences.
The non-profit research fund focuses on early-stage innovative research where relatively small and timely grants can significantly advance understanding, especially of the viability and scalability of proposals to address global warming.
Funded research projects are intended to produce peer-reviewed scholarly articles in recognized professional scientific and technical journals. Any intellectual property that may be generated in the course of such research resides with the researchers or their institutions.
Grants for research are provided to the University of Calgary from gifts made by Mr. Bill Gates from his personal funds.
The activities of the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research fall outside the scope of activities of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. FICER is not a Foundation project and has no relationship with it.
The fund has supported research in a wide range of areas. Some examples include:
• understanding carbon dioxide emissions associated with international trade in goods and services;
• developing technologies to capture carbon dioxide out of the air; and
• climate modeling to understand possible environmental consequences of solar radiation management.
Report On Geoengineering Activities
A select group of diabolic oligarch globalists and their puppet cronies embedded within the United States government are now involved in what some would say are crimes against humanity. These tyrants will stop at nothing to usher their hush, hush global aerosol agenda into full swing.
According to a report prepared for the Air Force titled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the WeatherBy 2025” the U.S. Air Force wants to fully control the weather on earth by the year 2025.
Far surpassing even the most horrific act of terror (real or staged), posing as literal gods, these globalists will stop at nothing to control the world by not only controlling the fraudulent banking systems but by owning the weather through a process (blanket term) called geoengineering.
According to globalist sponsored reports, our planet is in a constant state of threat and is being bombarded with radioactive solar rays increasing planetary temperatures due to human carbon emissions.
However, vast bodies of research now show that that is not the case and that global warming is a another globalist myth, a ponzi scheme to collect a Carbon Tax worldwide, benefitting the very same group behind the curtain.
The myth the global warming “Carbon Tax” pushers have been spouting apparently can only be fixed by spraying deadly toxins in an aerosol particulate form into the earths atmosphere via large sprayer converted aircraft specifically assigned to perform Geoengineering tasks.
Aerosol sprays (slang: Chemtrails) are filled with a variety of chemical and metal compounds and are known to be very hazardous to human, plant, and animal health worldwide. This danger to plant and human and animal health has been documented in films such as “What In the World Are They Spraying” by Michael Murphy & G. Edward Griffin, who have also appeared on the Intellihub Radio Show with Shepard Ambellas.
Ultimately, this issue was originally a matter for the EPA to rule over considering that they have the authority to sanction geoengineering activities under the National Environmental Policy ACT of 1969. However, documents such as the report to the chairman, Committee of Science and Technology, House of Representatives – “Climate Change” – Sept. 2010, U.S. Gov. Accountability Office which was submitted to all members of congress in 2010 attempt to put control into the hands of even a smaller group of people.
This report clearly is slanted and leans to take control away from the EPA along with other regulatory provisions such as; the Endangered Species ACT, and the Conformity Provision in the Clean Air ACT – total Geoengineering dis-info submitted to members of the Congress and other government branches alike.
The source of most of the dis-info is Obama’s White House Science Czar John P. Holdren. The following was written on USGCRP letterhead;
Members of Congress:
On behalf of the National Science and Technology Council, I am transmitting a copy of Our Changing Planet: The U.S. Global Change Research Program for Fiscal Year 2011. The report describes the activities and plans of the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) established under the Global Change Research Act (GCRA) of 1990. The USGCRP coordinates and integrates scientific research on climate and global change and is supported by 13 participating departments and agencies of the U.S. government. This Fiscal Year 2011 edition of Our Changing Planet highlights recent advances and progress made by participating agencies and includes budget information on each agency’s contribution.
This report describes a program in transition. In accordance with the GCRA, the USGCRP agencies requested guidance from the National Research Council on how to best meet the changing needs of the nation to understand climate change and respond to its impacts, and the NRC responded with a 2009 report entitled “Restructuring Federal Climate Research to Meet the Challenges of Climate Change”. In accord with that report’s recommendations, the USGCRP is undergoing a strategic realignment that will ensure that the science produced is maximally useful for decision makers at all scales. As described in the new edition of Our Changing Planet, the program going forward will place greater emphasis on impacts, vulnerabilities, and on understanding the options for adapting to the changing climate. The program will also continue its long-standing support for activities that contribute to a better understanding of the Earth system, including observations, research, and predictive modeling.
All of these focuses will be reflected in the USGCRP’s new strategic plan and its National Climate Assessment.
The USGCRP is committed to its mission to build a knowledge base that informs human responses to global change through coordinated and integrated federal programs of research, education, communication, and decision support. I appreciate the close cooperation of the participating agencies, and I look forward to working with the Congress in the continued development and implementation of this essential national program.
John P. Holdren Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy Assistant to the President for Science and Technology” – Our Changing Planet
Even more disturbing then that is the fact that your so called representatives have been approving yearly geoengineering budgets in the upwards of billions of dollars per year (as outlined in the document “Our Changing Planet – The US Global Change Research Program for the Fiscal Year of 2011, which is a supplement to the Presidents Budget for 2011, much of which is unaccounted for and not even included in the budget possible signifying even a more nefarious plot involving some black budget.
Back tracking to the year 2001, President elect George W. Bush established the (CCRI) Climate Change Research Initiative. A year later it was made public that the USGCRP or United States Global Change Research program and the CCRI both would become what is known as the (CCSP) Climate Change Science Program. Now, under the Obama Administration the legacy continues to move forward as the USGCRP.
A report entitled “Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States” released in 2009, documents how the USGCRP divided the US into nine regions similar to FEMA regions. Also tucked into the report was the statement “A central finding of the report was that the vast majority of climate scientists agree that global warming is unequivocal and primarily human induced” – Source: Our Changing Planet.
The document goes on to mention the devastating effects of climate change, including the effect on crops, human health and livestock.
But the most startling fact in the document is the actual budget itself, a mere 2.7 billion for 2011 alone (not including many costs) 24% higher than 2010’s budget.
The Global Change Research ACT of 1990, SEC. 102, Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences states;
a) ESTABLISHMENT.–The President, through the Council, shall establish a Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences. The Committee shall carry out Council functions under section 401 of the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6651) relating to global change research, for the purpose of increasing the overall effectiveness and productivity of Federal global change research efforts.
(b) MEMBERSHIP.–The Committee shall consist of at least one representative from–
1. the National Science Foundation;
2. the National Aeronautics and Space Administration;
3. the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the Department of Commerce;
4. the Environmental Protection Agency;
5. the Department of Energy;
6. the Department of State;
7. the Department of Defense;
8. the Department of the Interior;
9. the Department of Agriculture;
10. the Department of Transportation;
11. the Office of Management and Budget;
12. the Office of Science and Technology Policy;
13. the Council on Environmental Quality;
14. the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health; and
15. such other agencies and departments of the United States as the President or the Chairman of the Council considers appropriate.
Such representatives shall be high ranking officials of their agency or department, wherever possible the head of the portion of that agency or department that is most relevant to the purpose of the title described in section 101(b).
(c) CHAIRPERSON.–The Chairman of the Council, in consultation with the Committee, biennially shall select one of the Committee members to serve as Chairperson. The Chairperson shall be knowledgeable and experienced with regard to the administration of scientific research programs, and shall be a representative of an agency that contributes substantially, in terms of scientific research capability and budget, to the Program.
(d) SUPPORT PERSONNEL.–An Executive Secretary shall be appointed by the Chairperson of the
Committee, with the approval of the Committee. The Executive Secretary shall be a permanent employee of one of the agencies or departments represented on the Committee, and shall remain in the employ of such agency or department. The Chairman of the Council shall have the authority to make personnel decisions regarding any employees detailed to the Council for purposes of working on business of the Committee pursuant to section 401 of the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6651).
(e) FUNCTIONS RELATIVE TO GLOBAL CHANGE.–The Council, through the Committee, shall be responsible for planning and coordinating the Program. In carrying out this responsibility, the Committee shall–
1. serve as the forum for developing the Plan and for overseeing its implementation;
2. improve cooperation among Federal agencies and departments with respect to global change research activities;
3. provide budgetary advice as specified in section 105;
4. work with academic, State, industry, and other groups conducting global change research, to
provide for periodic public and peer review of the Program;
5. cooperate with the Secretary of State in– (A) providing representation at international meetings and conferences on global change research in which the United States participates; and
(B) coordinating the Federal activities of the United States with programs of other nations and with international global change research activities such as the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program;
6. consult with actual and potential users of the results of the Program to ensure that such results are useful in developing national and international policy responses to global change; and
7. report at least annually to the President and the Congress, through the Chairman of the Council, on Federal global change research priorities, policies, and programs.”
The following is a list of the members included in the Subcommittee on Global Change Research;
SUBCOMMITTEE ON GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
Made up of the following members:
Thomas Karl -Department of Commerce Chair
Thomas Armstrong - Department of the Interior Vice Chair, Adaptation Research
Mike Freilich - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Vice Chair, Integrated Observations
Timothy Killeen - National Science Foundation Vice Chair, Strategic Planning
William Breed -U.S. Agency for International Development
John Balbus - Department of Health and Human Services
William Hohenstein - Department of Agriculture
Jack Kaye - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Chester Koblinsky - Department of Commerce
Linda Lawson - Department of Transportation
Leonard Hirsch - Smithsonian Institution
Anna Palmisano - Department of Energy
A description of the subcommittee on (p.2) Our Changing Planet Reads;
“The USGCRP is directed by the Subcommittee for Global Change Research (SGCR), which falls under the National Science and Technology Council. The SGCR comprises representatives from 13 departments and agencies and is led by a Chair from one of the participating agencies (currently from the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA]). In order to align the program’s governance with the needs, Vice- Chairs have been identified for Strategic Planning, Integrated Observations, and Adaptation Research. Additional vice-chairs will be identified as needed. The program is supported by the USGCRP Integration and Coordination Office and conducts many of its activities through interagency working groups that plan and implement research and crosscutting activities, such as communications, decision support, and information and data concerns. The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) work closely with the SGCR, the Integration and Coordination Office, and the interagency working groups to establish research priorities and funding plans to ensure that the program is aligned with national priorities, reflects agency planning, and meets the requirements of the GCRA. “
The Subcommittee in question has now supplied the President with a supplement to the fiscal budget for 2011, which was presented to members of congress in January of 2011 on behalf of the National Science and Technology Policy – Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, John P. Holdren.
The (USGCRP) brings together a total of 13 different agencies and merges them into one single agency program that has been in the works science 1988 or prior.
In 1990 the USGCRP received generous congressional support under (GCRA P.L. 101-606). It is no mystery that aerosol spraying operations have been ongoing since the early 1990’s. Prior to 1990 one could enjoy a true clear blue sky, a figment of the past in 2011 – where none are to be found.
So just how deep does the geoengineering/terraforming rabbit hole go? The Intellihub was able to obtain a copy of the final report prepared by the University of Calgary under contract by Aurora Flight Sciences titled “Geoengineering cost analysis.”
In the report there is smoking gun evidence of the entire geoengineering saga from the secret bases, to the payload, to what type of aircraft or “airship” will be the most cost effective to spread toxic particulates throughout the earths atmosphere.
The final report also included budgets for different applications for aerosol dispersal within the atmosphere.
“Existing aircraft are evaluated based on cost of acquisition and operations. An in-depth new aircraft design study and cost analysis was conducted to determine the cost of developing and operating a dedicated geoengineering airplane type. Similarly, an airship design study and cost analysis was conducted. Finally a survey of non-aircraft systems was conducted to determine how their costs compare to aircraft and airships.
Yearly costs of 1M tonne geoengineering operations for all the systems examined are presented in Figure 2. Some systems are easily written off due to extremely high costs. Rocket based systems are not cost competitive due to the large number of launches required and the impact of occasional rocket failures on required fleet size. A system based on 16Σ” naval Mark 7 guns was analyzed and compared to previous work by the National Research Council.4 This system requires large numbers of shots increasing projectile costs and driving yearly costs over $100B. Gun costs become more competitive if the projectile payload fraction can be increased from about 10% for a standard shell to 50%. With this and a few improvements over the 1940-era Mark 7 gun yearly costs are still in the $20B range….The primary vehicles examined to lift particulate to stratospheric altitudes and disperse them at a predetermined release rate are airplanes and airships; rockets and other non- aircraft methods such as guns and suspended pipes are also surveyed.” –Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.5)
“Geoengineering may provide a means to create a time buffer against catastrophic cli- mate change while long-term emissions reduction actions take effect. One approach is to disperse sulfur compounds at high altitude to reduce the effective solar flux entering the atmosphere. This report will evaluate the means of delivering sufficient mass of this or similar material to affect climate change on a global scale. The goal of this study is to use engineering design and cost analysis to determine the feasibility and cost of a delivering material to the stratosphere for solar radiation management (SRM). This study does notexamine effectiveness or risks of injecting material into the stratosphere for SRM. Its goal is simply to compare a range of delivery systems on a single cost basis.” – Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.6)
The report mentions how payload costs are not included in the estimate nor are the base/facility costs and continues on (p.8) to say;
“This study focuses on airplane and airship operations to the stratosphere to release a geoengineering payload with the goal of reducing incoming solar flux. Airships are also considered for this mission. To provide a comparison to conventional aircraft operations, more exotic concepts such as rockets, guns, and suspended pipes are also examined….For maximum cooling impact, the particulate payloads are best placed near the equator. This study assumes that the payload is released within latitudes 30°N and 30°S, though North-South basing location had minimal effect on cost. Transit operations, flying East- West between equally spaced bases around the equator, were examined as a method to ensure adequate dispersal of the payload around the equator. Global winds aid in East-West dispersal so a smaller number of bases and shorter range systems (referred to as Regional operations) can be employed with minimal impact on dispersal. Region- al operations allow the dispersal leg length to be dictated by the desired release rate of 0.03kg/m flown. This means the airplanes fly no further than they have to, on the order of 300-800 km, and fuel costs are minimized.” – Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final report Yearly cost estimates from different dispersal methods ranged from over 1 billion dollars a year all the way up to rocket dispersed aerosol in the upper atmosphere at the cost of over 100 billion dollars per year.
Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.” – Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderbergers at Evian, France, May 21, 1992.
Update – March 31, 2011:
• Aluminum resistant gene patent # 7582809
• Patent granted on September 1, 2009
• Patent developed at the Robert W. Holley Center for Agricultural Health at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY.
• Leon Kochian and Jurandir Vieira de Magallhaes are the primary inventors/ researchers
• Patent assigned to US Department of Agriculture and Brazilian Enterprise for Agricultural Research
• According to Cornell University Chronicle Online, the research project was supported in part by the McKnight Foundation Collaborative Crop Research Program, the Generation Challenge Program, the National Science Foundation and the USDA.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a contributor to both the McKnight Foundation and the Generation Challenge Program.
^ http://www.gatesfoundation.org/press-re ... 90901.aspx
^ California SkyWatch
^ Agriculture Defense Coalition
^ GeoEngineering Watch
^ Arizona SkyWatch
^ Henry Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide
^ Food Sovereignty
^ David Keith GeoEngineering
^ Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER)
http://intellihub.com/2011/03/30/secret ... e-roaches/
Sir David Attenborough, the wildlife presenter, has described high-tech “geo-engineering” solutions to climate change as “fascist” because they put too much power in the hands of advanced nations.
Sir David Attenborough (R) speaks to presenter Andrew Marr Photo: GETTY IMAGES
Sir David, 85, said he believed that global warming was inevitable but that everything possible should be done to slow the process.
However, he added that said that large-scale geoengineering projects - such schemes to remove carbon monoxide from the atmosphere – were problematic.
Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show yesterday, he said: “Geoengineering is a very difficult thing because what that means is that you allow one nation or, indeed, one small group within that nation to determine what's going to happen to the whole globe.
”And they may say 'Yes, we are absolutely confident about the science' but what about all those other people who don't know about that?
“It's, dare I say the word, fascist.”
Sir David’s latest work is the Frozen Planet series, the final instalment of which was broadcast last week.
Frozen Planet - and its presenter – have been criticised for promoting opinions on global warming.
Lord Leach of Fairford, a Tory peer who claims global warming is debatable, said: “He’s very endearing but I don't think there's any truth to what he says - he has no idea about it.
“The fact is you can be jolly nice to monkeys but it isn't the same as knowing what you're talking about on climate change.”
Sir David also had an exchange of views with Lord Lawson, the former Chancellor, who accused the presenter of “sensationalism”.
Speaking on the Marr show, Sir David said: “If you go and ask people who are living up there whether it’s happening they don’t have any doubt.
“There isn’t any question but that the poles are warming.
“The North Pole is warming. The South Pole is a different thing. The South Pole is a huge ice cap miles thick and to some extent it makes its own weather but it is quite possible that within the next 20 or 30 years that North Pole in winter will remain open so you will be able to sail from the Atlantic to the Pacific.
“It means extinction for the polar bears but you might say “What does it mean for world trade?” and killer whales will be able to travel [between the two].
“We should be trying to reduce the rate at which the planet warms. We aren’t going to be able to stop it, that’s for sure. All we are going to be able to do is slow it down.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/enviro ... scist.html
We Are All Lab Rats In A Grand And Lethal Experiment
Unimaginable global climate experiments have been going on in many forms for more years than most would believe. One can not even begin to touch the full depth of the rabbit hole without writing a series of books on the activities of the “collective insanity” that runs the world. How can small numbers of clinically insane psychopaths gain such control over the world’s populations? Because until now most could stay in denial, repeat the “official narrative” dictated to them by those in power, and stay in their comfort zone bubbles. The days of “head in the sand” denial are rapidly coming to an end as there is no longer any hiding from what is unfolding around us all. What we collectively do with the time we have will determine whether or not there is anything to salvage for life on planet earth.
Keeping Up To Speed With Constantly Changing Information
In regard to the artificial/chemical nucleated snow, finally a critical awareness has emerged. We must fan these flames of awakening while at the same time continuing to examine changing data. The following is one example, the Weather Channel has just today made a point of emphasizing that the snow falling in the coming days will be “heavy wet snow, not like the snow that fell in January“. This is an exact quote. So the snow that falls in February is different than snow that falls in January? Yes, it can be very different on any given day or during any given “storm” if the climate engineers change the chemical mix or the artificial nucleation process.
There is no doubt about the artificial nucleation of the snow being carried out as there are many factors to confirm this. First, we can see bands of rain “flashing out” to snow on radar images, often causing snowfall to begin falling at far above freezing temperatures (though the ongoing nucleation process can cause radical short term cooling to far below freezing temperatures as engineered events unfold). Next, there is the completely anomalous “non melting” characteristics of recent snow samples. Finally, and most importantly, we have lab tests to confirm toxic metals in the snow that match climate engineering patents exactly. All this being said, there is much we still can not know about all the various mixes and methods of artificial nucleation. We can not lock into a particular event as conditions can and will vary. We must also remember that natural snow still of course exists under the appropriate conditions although everything that falls from the sky is tainted to some degree at this point.
The radar image below is one example of a variable in this equation. What part are the numerous radio frequency towers playing in the behavior of the sprayed atmospheric particulates? Specific polarization of particles like barium can cause ice to nucleate at temperatures far above freezing also.
Climate engineering is an inconceivably massive and ongoing EXPERIMENT. Experiments are always subject to change and this case is no different. Given there was so much attention on the recent chemically nucleated snow that did not melt in any usual way, the experiment may have been altered. Again, is it just coincidence that the Weather Channel has made it a point in recent days to emphasize that the snow falling in the coming days will be “unlike the snow that fell in January“?
Documented Experiments From The Past Conducted By The US Government
ABC’s Unsolved Mysteries: Toxic Clear Gelatinous Blobs in Rainfall Sicken Residents of Oakville, Washington State-1994
What Is Another Example Of Our Government Experimenting On Innocent Civilians?
The 13 most evil experiments conducted on civilians by the US government
While absolutely horrific things are going on around the globe, climate engineering, several dozen countries descending into chaos, resource depletion, nuclear meltdowns at Fukushima, the oceans dying, etc., turning on the main stream media stations today (February 4 2014) yielded the following stories.
CNN covered illegal immigration
FOX covered the Benghazi issue
MSNBC covered Obama’s virtues (does he have any?)
Main stream media will continue to do try and distract attention from anything dire or important, that is their job. They will continue to cover one trivial drama after another, they will continue to try and discredit anything that is drawing attention to important issues like the climate engineering.
Each of us needs to be aware and awake. We need to examine and re-examine data day in and day out so that we can keep up with changes and not lock into perceptions and conclusions. In the case of the artificial/chemical nucleated snow, is that real? Yes. Is such snow always the same? Data from the ground, lab testing and sound reason says no. The ongoing “experiment” can change any time as can overall conditions. People from some locations may correctly report their snow seems normal, and it could be. This does not mean that those who reported very strange and unnatural snow were wrong, they are not. The artificially nucleated chemical snow is very real and verifiable. Lab tests prove it is full of toxic metals and we are still looking for other elements. I hope we will all be vigilant with improving our understanding and perception of the ongoing facts.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/medi ... on-us-all/
they removed them links which states the obvious
- Related topics
- Last post