Global Warming treaty to usher in one-world government?*

[Savwafair2012 Profile]

Globalisation and The New World Order

Some people see the New World Order lurking behind every corner, a cabal
of people just waiting to impose a one-world government the moment
opportunity knocks.
Those people recently got a boost from Christopher Monckton, a one-time
advisor to former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who's turned
himself into one of the most prominent of global warming skeptics.


"At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen,
this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will
sign it .... I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world
government is going to be created," Monckton said at a recent event
sponsored by the Minnesota Free Market Institute.


"The word 'government' actually appears as the first of three purposes
of the new entity .... How many of you think that the word 'election' or
'democracy' or 'vote' or 'ballot' occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of
that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the
communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental
movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left
within a year, because [the communists] captured it -- now the
apotheosis is at hand. They are about to impose a communist world
government on the world. You have a president who has very strong
sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign
anything."


Monckton's words have rocketed around the fringe: WorldNetDaily reported
on them, as did conspiracist radio talker Alex Jones' Prison Planet Web
site. At a similarly extreme site, Canada Free Press, one writer used
Monckton's warning as evidence for an article entitled "Without a shot
being fired, a dictator has taken over the United States." And, of
course, Birther lawyer Orly Taitz heard about it and put up a post on
her blog asking for help getting in touch with Monckton.


If that were the full list of people who'd fallen for Monckton's line,
it might not be worth much mention. But it's not. Conservative blogger
Michelle Malkin, who's also a Fox News contributor, had a post on
Monckton's remarks. On Twitter, Saul Anuzis, who chaired the Michigan
Republican Party until just recently and was an unsuccessful candidate
to head the Republican National Committee, linked to a report on what
Monckton said. The report to which Anuzis linked was published by a Web
site advertising one video about FEMA internment camps and another about
how one of the Rothschilds picked President Obama as part of a plot "to
murder America."


Problem is, Monckton's reading of the proposed framework for negotiation
-- hardly a completed treaty -- was woefully inaccurate. And that's a
nice way of putting it. The document clearly does nothing whatsoever to
promote any sort of world government, and indeed, it refers to the
efforts of national governments repeatedly.


Here's the sole evidence in the framework for Monckton's claim:


The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention
will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative
mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which
will include the following:


(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new
subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for
the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes
and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as
appropriate.


(The COP to which that language refers is the Conference of the Parties,
which the official UN Web site explains as, "the 'supreme body' of the
Convention, that is, its highest decision-making authority. It is an
association of all the countries that are Parties to the Convention ...
[and] is responsible for keeping international efforts to address
climate change on track.")


Unfortunately for Monckton and those who've fallen for what he said
without doing some rudimentary checking of the document's language,
there's more than one meaning of the word "government." There's the
conventional definition, the one he used, and then there's this one,
which is very clearly the one intended in this case: "direction;
control; management; rule: the government of one's conduct."


Update: As if on cue, Glenn Beck picked up on Monckton's comments, and
interviewed him for his radio show Monday. Beck also told Monckton,
"what I'd like to do is I'd like to, I'd like to spend an hour with you,
quite honestly, Lord Monckton, and have you on the TV show and maybe
bring in ambassador John Bolton about this as well."

The Global Warming/Climate Change fraud was created by the elite to centralize power and give humanity an enemy : Itself.
"The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."

[Nuffrespect Profile]

long docu about this 1 hour 20 minutes