happy new year welcome w3

Posts: 1544
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:36 pm

PostWed Nov 19, 2008 8:50 am » by Truthseeker

so its going to get bad ,verry bad . :twisted:
is this why we have been credit crunched have a good xmas ,but dont eat all the food you might need to start geting redy to be a survivor funny is that a new uk tv series .
When Will It Start?

Rixon Stewart – October 31, 2008

Scroll down for update – November 10, 2008

Iran flexes its missile capability

Like pieces in a chess game, strategic assets are being positioned and preparations being made. This is being done with minimal publicity but plans are now well underway for truly momentous events.

None of this should come as a surprise, of course. Some time ago a trusted clairvoyant friend warned that tensions with Iran would ultimately erupt into war, one that in time would escalate into a global conflict. More recently he gave a date, which we’ve withheld until we had confirmation for what will essentially be the beginning of World War III.

Well, recent weeks have provided some unsettling corroboration.

A variety of indications have appeared all pointing in the same direction and although none explicitly signals war with Iran, you only have to join the dots to see that’s exactly where we are heading.

One of the first signs came in mid October when top international military officials met in Adirondacks, U.S.A. This was no ordinary summit; high-ranking military commanders from France, Germany, Italy and Britain met with members of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff in an isolated forest reserve in northern New York, the location no doubt chosen to keep publicity to a minimum.

Given other recent pointers it’s likely Iran was high on the agenda. They may even have discussed plans for a concerted military strike, or as this writer suspects, planned their response following an initial Israeli strike on Iran.

Because another give-away signalling as much recently came from Obama’s running mate, Joe Biden.

Although ostensibly from an Irish/American background, Biden is also an avowed Zionist on record as saying 'You don't have to be a Jew to be a Zionist'.

Essentially he is in place to make sure Obama follows the correct game plan. If he doesn’t, a ‘lone assassin’ or suchlike will deal with Obama and Biden will then step-up and assume office.

Biden makes his point

However, Biden’s obvious giveaway came on Sunday October 19, when he warned that if elected, Obama would face a testing time initially.

“Mark my words,” said Biden emphatically. “It will not be six months [after his inauguration] before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy….Watch. We’re going to have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”

Whence this certitude? How does Biden know that Obama will face an “international crisis” a “generated crisis” if he becomes president? In two separate speeches the same day he warned of this “crisis” but more to the point: how does Biden know so precisely when it will occur?

Uncannily, his timing corresponds exactly with our psychic friend’s warning.

A while back he warned that conflict with Iran would begin around April 2009, which just so happens to be during the first “six months” of the new president’s term.

Is this the crisis Biden refers to?

That being the case, this would indeed “test the mettle” of the new president. And if conflict does erupt between Israel and Iran will he throw the U.S. military in support of Israel, in keeping with previous agreements?

However Obama may react, other ominous factors are coming in to view.

Much depends on the current face-off between Israel and Iran but whether this erupts into open military conflict hinges to a large extent on the outcome of the Israeli elections in February.

There are two main contenders.

If Tzipi Livni wins we believe that Israel may learn to live with Iran, even if relations remain somewhat chilly. For despite being the daughter of two prominent Irgun members, Tzipi Livni is pragmatic enough to understand that military confrontation is not the only option in dealing with Iran.

On the other hand, if Likud hardliner Benjamin Netanyahu wins it will be another story altogether. Netanyahu is on record as describing 9/11 as “beneficial” for Israel and reportedly received prior warning of the 7/7 attack in London – so electoral victory for him will make war with Iran almost certain.

That being the case, it's likely that Israel will make the opening move: either with a false flag operation or a direct strike on at least some of Iran’s nuclear facilities. Nonetheless, Israeli military success is far from assured – Iran is well armed and prepared, some distance from Israel and intelligence on it is poor – so Israel knows its chances against Iran are limited if it acts alone.

So instead of outright initial military success, Israel may well be banking on U.S. intervention when Iran retaliates, as it most assuredly will. From that point on anything can happen and what starts out as a regional clash could easily escalate into a global military conflict.

Here it should be noted that our psychic friend says the conflict will start “slowly, slowly” but escalate into something much, much bigger.

America and its western allies will probably all line up alongside Israel while Hezbollah, the Mahdi Army, Syria and a nuclear capable Pakistan will likely side with Iran.

So too will Russia, eventually, and we are reliably informed that ultimately China will also play a critical role; helping to turn what starts out as a limited regional clash into a global conflagration.

All of which should underline the fact that the Obama/Biden combination is no different from McCain/Palin or for that matter Bush/Cheney. Although the personalities and presentation may be different, they all follow the same agenda regardless. And no matter what the participants in this political puppet show may say, we may soon find ourselves in a global confrontation that could cost hundreds of millions, maybe even billions of lives.

Update – November 10, 2008

As if further evidence was needed that military action was a real prospect, word has been received from inside the armaments industry that largely confirms the above.

According to a reliable source: orders have recently been submitted by Britain’s Ministry of Defence for large quantities of airborne munitions. The only other occasions such large quantities have been ordered was prior to the 1990 Gulf War and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

The orders are currently being completed and we leave readers to draw their own conclusions.

Printer friendly with pictures / without pictures Email this article to a friend

Last updated 10/11/2008


bbc is pluging tv series surviors and talking about virouses ,will it be a good year for bugs next year . :bang;

Posts: 1544
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:36 pm

PostWed Nov 19, 2008 8:53 am » by Truthseeker

Obama is not about "Change"
From Jan Lamprecht – African Crisis November 16, 2008


I thought the following news article would interest you...

African American: The Daily Nigger - I don’t give a f**k about Africa…
Date Posted: Sunday 16-Nov-2008

[The Daily Nigger website is actually fun! Jan]

By NNIC | November 14, 2008

I don't give a f**k about Africa. I don't care if it is a continent, a country, an animal, a particle or a planet. F**k Africa. I don't want to live there, and I certainly don't want to waste my time visiting there. F**k it once, f**k it twice, and f**k it all over again. I'm American, so f**k Africa.

Whew, man. Now I feel better. I had like this big f**king frog in my throat doing that ribbit sound whenever I wanted to talk. I had this big problem that I needed to get out of the way before I could actually make any more points at The Daily Nigger about Obama.

What is amazing is that white people have voted for a mulatto whose only blackness is from Africa, not America. This guy wouldn't give a s**t about me. I'm too chocolate and American for Obama. I'm not from another country, and even though there is a slave story running through my family tree like a wilting Jack In The Beanstalk, I personally don't care. I'm not going to leave. Slavery happened a hundred and fifty years ago, and sure times were tough in America after slavery ended, but it was hard on everybody, not just for blacks. At this point we're all in this together, wouldn't you say?

Why is that black people are suddenly Afro-centric and falling at the feet of Obama like he is the captain of the ships that were sent over to pick us niggers up and take us all back to Africa? What the hell is going on, because I'll tell you all something, I for one am not going to go back. I love shopping at Safeway and Ross too much. I like where I live even though my neighborhood is chock full of goofy white folks who for some odd reason like to flaunt their unfit physique by jogging all hours of the day. Hell, I'll suffer through any amount of white folks just to be able to have all the conveniences I have here. And so, did I mention f**k Africa?

What the hell is going on with black people with their fascination with Obama. He doesn't share one single solitary thing with the American black experience other than perhaps his mother's ancestors used to own slaves. Other than that he is impervious to the black American experience, but don't go telling that to white folks. They'll be offended and demand that you stop being 'racist'. My goodness, imagine that. White folks being offended by black folks who call Obama a honky. Again, that's what I call change you can believe in.

I'm not interested in Africa no more than Ted Kennedy longs for Ireland or Arnold Schwarzenegger gives a rat's ass about Austria. No matter how dangerous Obama is given his overt socialist leanings, American Jews aren't beating a path to Israel out of fear that another round of national socialism has beset us along with a hyped-up advertising campaign and a plethora of subversive types reminiscent of Hitler's era in Germany. The signs are all there: The hard economic times, the fear, the sudden meteoric rise of an unknown quantity. Yet nobody budges. Everyone stays put.

I have more faith in black people than black people have in themselves. I believe that when they start understanding how little they have in common with Obama they will begin to quietly assess how they cannot trust the media. I give black people credit for having more sense than most people are willing to give them. I personally am aware that many of them are beginning to realize that they have been taken in by another media spectacular just like the WMD scandal that shoved the Iraq invasion down our throats regardless of whether Bush was the right guy or not to execute what was otherwise a plan to take out Saddam Hussein that had been on the table for a long time.

American black people do have a lot of sense, but I feel they are overwhelmingly embarrassed right now to admit to what has occurred. They don't want to have to admit that Obama is not about change, because he has filled key positions with former Clinton administration officials. Black people now have to pay attention to these inconvenient truths unlike before when they could just shrug off their responsibility for participating in government. And moreover, blacks have to come to terms with the fact that their emotions got ahead of their own sensibilities. They thought they were getting the first black president, but what they got was an international pop start cult figure who has absolutely nothing in common with American black people other than his affiliation with his church, which by the way most black people I know would be caught dead attending.

So, just give me my America complete with its problematic past, its twisted and confusing present, its convoluted sense of reality and its unmistakably illogical history of survival amid the horror of confusion and decadence. After all, if anyone should know that democracy is messy then it's American black folks.

Original source URL: www.thedailynigger.com/2008/11/14/

Posted By: Gairk
*AfricanCrisis Volunteer*

Source Url: www.africancrisis.co.za/Article.php?ID=38265&

Printer friendly version Email this article to a friend

Last updated 17/11/2008



Posts: 1544
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:36 pm

PostWed Nov 19, 2008 8:57 am » by Truthseeker

well will it change :clapper:
The Israeli Who Will Run the Obama White House
Written by Christopher Bollyn
Thursday, 06 November 2008

Why is this man laughing? Rahm Emanuel, Obama's political handler and new chief of staff, is an Israeli whose father is a member of the most notorious terrorist group in Israeli history. How long will the controlled media ignore Emanuel's family ties to Zionist terrorism? Do Americans, the people forced to fight and fund the fraudulent, violent, and costly "War on Terror" even care?

In the past 13 days, nearly 20,000 people have read my article about Rahm Emanuel, the Israeli who is Obama's chief of staff, yet only 11 people have saw fit to respond to my appeal for donations: three Australians, a Briton, a Canadian, and six Americans. Thus far, the following exposé, which reveals the highest-level Zionists who created Obama the candidate and who will control the Obama White House has only brought in about $320 -- which means that I have gotten a donation from about 1 out of every 2,000 readers, or less than 1/16 of 1 per cent.

I realize that times are tough all over with the Zionist-manufactured "credit crunch" (if you are not on the receiving end of the Trillion Dollar bail-out) but I simply need more support than this to cover my costs. If you appreciate my articles, please send a donation.

My next article, which will be published tomorrow, will be an exposé of another high-level Israeli in the U.S. government who is directing U.S. policy in the Middle East while making sure Israeli intelligence knows everything -- before it happens. This Israeli citizen has been controlling U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East for two decades. Like the other Israelis I have exposed: Rahm Emanuel, Michael Chertoff, and Daniel Samuel Senor, this U.S. official is an agent produced by the Israeli intelligence network that was sent to the United States in the 1950s. These people are Zionist agents of Israel operating at the highest level of the U.S. government. This is very serious infiltration that cannot be ignored.

Americans and others need to realize that Israeli intelligence is like the criminal organization in the latest James Bond film: They are everywhere, supporting politicians on both sides of the aisle, creating and running governments from the left and the right (including your own), yet you don't even know they exist! Over the past 6 decades, Israeli agents have infiltrated every agency of the U.S. government and have access to all of the critical computer networks. My next article is in the same vein as my revelations about the senior Israeli agents Michael Chertoff, Rahm Emanuel, and Dan Senor.

An American supporter sent this note about my latest article about Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama with his donation:

Keep researching and writing. Eventually, even the sheeple will have to take notice. Your article on Emanuel is a treasure. I was stupefied after reading as I watched a ten-minute segment on him on The McLaughlin Group - you'd think they were talking about a Kansas farm boy. No background info.

"No background info" in the controlled media about Rahm Emanuel is absolutely correct. This is how my articles are different from the controlled media -- I provide the background material that matters. It is also why I was attacked by undercover police at my home in 2006, maliciously prosecuted, and forced to go into exile. Emanuel, an Israeli citizen (from my hometown) who employs gangster tactics, will be the next chief of staff of the executive branch of the U.S. government. You simply will not get the information in my article from any other journalist. CNN and the other controlled media will not even broach the subject of Emanuel's Israeli roots. In order to understand what the Obama administration will mean for America and the world, however, it is essential to understand the immense Zionist power and money behind Obama.

Can Obama deliver change with so many Zionist strings attached?

When one considers that Obama has been financed and supported by the biggest Zionists in America since 1992 it becomes clear that John McCain was merely playing the role of a presidential candidate, i.e. he was a fake candidate whose real purpose was to allow his opponent to win. This can only be understood when one realizes that both political parties in the United States are completely controlled by Zionist money.

John McCain, who would have been the oldest president ever, was not meant to win. His only purpose was to make the rigged presidential race look like a real political contest, which is one of the fundamental deceptions of U.S. politics. The other is that our votes are actually counted
:peep: :bang; :twisted: get stocked up on fuel food and be safe out there : :peep:

Posts: 1544
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:36 pm

PostThu Nov 20, 2008 11:02 pm » by Truthseeker

so next year going to get bad verry bad :twisted:
Paul: US would back Israeli strike on Iran

Press TV – July 28, 2008

Former US presidential candidate Ron Paul says should there be an Israeli strike on Iran over its nuclear work, it would not be unilateral.

The Texas congressman told Press TV that there is no 'such thing as independent Israel doing anything', dismissing speculation that the world may witness unilateral Israeli bombardments of Iranian nuclear sites.

"No matter what they do, it is our money, it is our weapons, and they are not going to do it without us approving it," said the 72-year-old Republican.

While the UN nuclear watchdog admits that there is no link between the use of nuclear material and the 'alleged studies' of weaponization attributed to Iran, the West continues to allege that Tehran is pursuing a military nuclear program.

Under US pressure, the UN Security Council has intervened in the nuclear case and has imposed three rounds of sanctions against Iran.

Upper Israeli echelons, who seek Washington's green light for attacking Iranian nuclear sites, have publicly threatened Tehran with the military action should the country continue uranium enrichment.

Tel Aviv, believed to possess the sole nuclear arsenal in the Middle East, reportedly staged a large-scale air maneuver in early June in preparation for a unilateral strike against Iran.

Top US officials and military commanders, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, have spoken against such military action.

In a recent article, Gates said 'another war in the Middle East is the last thing' the United States needs right now. He warned that a war with Iran would be 'disastrous on a number of levels'.

When asked last week about the prospect of an Israeli or US attack, Admiral Mullen said that he worries about 'the possible unintended consequences of a strike' on Iran.

"If they (Israelis) get in trouble, we are going to bail them out," continued congressman Paul, who is a staunch advocate of a diplomatic approach toward Iran over its nuclear program.

As the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) acknowledges the rights of all signatory states in uranium enrichment for peaceful purposes, Iran has cited diplomacy as the only means acceptable in settling the dispute surrounding its nuclear program.


Printer friendly version Email this article to a friend

Last updated 20/11/2008

Homepage :bang;

  • Related topics
    Last post