3/22/2012 Heavy Mass Object - 188 Day Cycle Explained

Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:42 pm » by **Chris6912**

dont know i if enyone s interested but the earthquake activerty is on the up again so what you realy think :bang;

this could be spot on to me and hope that everyone takes note dont want to be cought out wiv yer pants down do yer :pray:

Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:48 pm » by **Rydher**

Shiva, let's pretend you have never heard of Terral and you just stumbled on this information. Do you have a counter to the science he's proposing could be happening? I'd rather see you debunk the information rather than attack the person.

Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:01 pm » by **Rydher**

Terral has put out a time of 4:58:34 UTC as being when the Earthquake on 3/22 will happen. After looking at how he came to this, it's my opinion that there isn't enough information to make that prediction and there are far too many variables. Nonetheless, there it is.

Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:38 pm » by **Richc**

Every day i take a look at the USGS site for Earthquake activity and i am constantly confused at how there are constant and many 5+ Earthquakes all around the Pacific ring except for the west coast of America.. :headscratch:

How do they constantly dodge the big quake bullet recently.?

Is it just all building up to be unleashed in one big one on that coast or are they somehow redirecting the plate stresses in that area.?

RIK

Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:15 pm » by **Shiva777**

Terrals science is deeply flawed...that's why no geologists and astrophysicists of any credibility take this religious fruitcake seriously.He just scares alot of naive people.

Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:21 pm » by **Rydher**

shiva777 wrote:Terrals science is deeply flawed...that's why no geologists and astrophysicists of any credibility take this religious fruitcake seriously.He just scares alot of naive people.

Would you mind citing the deep flaws? The little research I can do into it appears to be valid.

Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:35 pm » by **Jet17**

richc wrote:Every day i take a look at the USGS site for Earthquake activity and i am constantly confused at how there are constant and many 5+ Earthquakes all around the Pacific ring except for the west coast of America..

How do they constantly dodge the big quake bullet recently.?

Is it just all building up to be unleashed in one big one on that coast or are they somehow redirecting the plate stresses in that area.?

RIK

because we are getting better at detecting them.

we are expanding our technology across the world, so, therefore; we are able to make better graphs and data.

the increase in "volcanic / earthquake" activity isn't because we are getting more earthquakes (in a general sense) but because we can detect them from long ranges, much easier. so we have to document them as they come, so as not to miss a certain percentage of them.

had this been in the 80's I am sure we wouldn't see as many earthquakes register, as we simply didn't have the tech back then, that we do now.

Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:58 pm » by **Richc**

jet17 wrote:
richc wrote:Every day i take a look at the USGS site for Earthquake activity and i am constantly confused at how there are constant and many 5+ Earthquakes all around the Pacific ring except for the west coast of America..

How do they constantly dodge the big quake bullet recently.?

Is it just all building up to be unleashed in one big one on that coast or are they somehow redirecting the plate stresses in that area.?

RIK

because we are getting better at detecting them.

we are expanding our technology across the world, so, therefore; we are able to make better graphs and data.

the increase in "volcanic / earthquake" activity isn't because we are getting more earthquakes (in a general sense) but because we can detect them from long ranges, much easier. so we have to document them as they come, so as not to miss a certain percentage of them.

had this been in the 80's I am sure we wouldn't see as many earthquakes register, as we simply didn't have the tech back then, that we do now.

Yes but my questions how is the West coast of North America rarely getting any 6+ when all the other regions around the Pacific rim are getting them.?

If you look at the world map on USGS you will see what i mean.
It always seems to be that way.

RIK

Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:45 am » by **Jet17**

richc wrote:
jet17 wrote:
richc wrote:Every day i take a look at the USGS site for Earthquake activity and i am constantly confused at how there are constant and many 5+ Earthquakes all around the Pacific ring except for the west coast of America..

How do they constantly dodge the big quake bullet recently.?

Is it just all building up to be unleashed in one big one on that coast or are they somehow redirecting the plate stresses in that area.?

RIK

because we are getting better at detecting them.

we are expanding our technology across the world, so, therefore; we are able to make better graphs and data.

the increase in "volcanic / earthquake" activity isn't because we are getting more earthquakes (in a general sense) but because we can detect them from long ranges, much easier. so we have to document them as they come, so as not to miss a certain percentage of them.

had this been in the 80's I am sure we wouldn't see as many earthquakes register, as we simply didn't have the tech back then, that we do now.

Yes but my questions how is the West coast of North America rarely getting any 6+ when all the other regions around the Pacific rim are getting them.?

If you look at the world map on USGS you will see what i mean.
It always seems to be that way.

RIK

You bring an interesting point.

:headscratch:

Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:31 pm » by **Rydher**

Only a few days away. I hope this whole thing is wrong. :pray: