Here's another Apollo UFO to debunk or not

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10102
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Packing my stuff and moving to Denver like you should be doing

PostTue Jun 25, 2013 4:45 pm » by Savwafair2012


Date of sighting: December 1972

Location of sighting: Earths Moon

Mission: NASA Apollo 17

Goal: Last Mission To Send Astronauts To The Moon.

Photo Link: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20863HR.jpg

Image


You thought you knew what UFOs look like since you have seen so much TV shows and movies with aliens and ships. This UFO is unlike any seen before either in real life or in a movie. This photo is an actual Apollo 17 photo from the last moon mission.



There are several intriguing things about this photo that you should keep in mind while considering the possibilities that such a ship can exist.



First off, notice that the Apollo astronauts themselves noticed the UFO. How do we know that? Because of the angle of the camera in the photo. It is aimed directly at the hovering UFO. Somewhere in a secret vault at NASA, there is a film recording of this UFO moving and watch the Apollo astronauts.



Image


Secondly, what if technology evolved past the existence of their creators? This makes a lot of sense since our technology is created around our imagination and how it may be useful to humans, but what if it was 50,000,000 years in the future and some of our machines existed without us...what would these living machines look like? Maybe something like what we see here in this moon photo. A craft or living machine created from the imagination of another machine.


Thirdly, Apollo 17 was not scheduled to be the last mission. There were three other missions slated to happen, but were scrapped by NASA. Apollo 18, 19 and 20 were either Top Secret covert missions or never happened. Why did they scrap them? Because they saw the film or photos of this biomechanical alien or craft and assumed the moon was populated by its species. This alien species which controlled the moon probably saw this human species as an intruder that may need being dealt with soon


Image
Image
FAIR USE NOTICE.
Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10102
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Packing my stuff and moving to Denver like you should be doing

PostTue Jun 25, 2013 5:24 pm » by Savwafair2012


Will buddy where you at on this one
:mrgreen:
Image
FAIR USE NOTICE.
Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9608
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostTue Jun 25, 2013 5:46 pm » by *WillEase*


Savwafair2012 wrote:Will buddy where you at on this one
:mrgreen:


No comment.

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10102
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Packing my stuff and moving to Denver like you should be doing

PostWed Jun 26, 2013 4:31 pm » by Savwafair2012


We need to really give all these images a good going over gents
:look:

Image



Upload to Disclose.tv

Image
FAIR USE NOTICE.
Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10102
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Packing my stuff and moving to Denver like you should be doing

PostWed Jun 26, 2013 5:14 pm » by Savwafair2012


So I'll have to assume that the gallery is still out on this one

:alien51:
Image
FAIR USE NOTICE.
Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Writer
User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:54 pm

PostThu Jul 04, 2013 3:24 pm » by Mac


I'm not saying it is.. but it may be a flaw in the emulsion..?

I put together a vid of Nasa ufo photographic stills a few years back. I included as many A.S. & S.T.S. frame numbers as possible at the time. You can check out the frame numbers for yourselves here: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/


Upload to Disclose.tv

Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9608
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostThu Jul 04, 2013 5:36 pm » by *WillEase*


Mac wrote:I'm not saying it is.. but it may be a flaw in the emulsion..?

I put together a vid of Nasa ufo photographic stills a few years back. I included as many A.S. & S.T.S. frame numbers as possible at the time. You can check out the frame numbers for yourselves here: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/


Upload to Disclose.tv



Image

I hate to say this...
But the gullibility involved in accepting this obscure nonsense is quite frankly disturbing.

Your posted picture up there: AS12-51-8553...

IT DOESN'T EXIST.
There was no #8553 on any magazine of AS12.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apoll ... ission/?12

(I am the last person you want to try to pass off fake NASA ufos to.)

Now, here is an actual photo from Apollo XII...

Image

Look familiar?
Description: S-IV-B; LUNAR MODULE EDGE
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apoll ... 0/7350.jpg


By the way, if you are going to hack someone elses video, at least give them credit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 9M#at=1630

Writer
User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:54 pm

PostThu Jul 04, 2013 7:48 pm » by Mac


WillEase666 wrote:
Mac wrote:I'm not saying it is.. but it may be a flaw in the emulsion..?

I put together a vid of Nasa ufo photographic stills a few years back. I included as many A.S. & S.T.S. frame numbers as possible at the time. You can check out the frame numbers for yourselves here: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/


Upload to Disclose.tv



Image

I hate to say this...
But the gullibility involved in accepting this obscure nonsense is quite frankly disturbing.

Your posted picture up there: AS12-51-8553...

IT DOESN'T EXIST.
There was no #8553 on any magazine of AS12.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apoll ... ission/?12

(I am the last person you want to try to pass off fake NASA ufos to.)

Now, here is an actual photo from Apollo XII...

Image

Look familiar?
Description: S-IV-B; LUNAR MODULE EDGE
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apoll ... 0/7350.jpg


By the way, if you are going to hack someone elses video, at least give them credit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 9M#at=1630


Wow - you're just an entire bag full of politeness! Don't accuse me of bullshit without knowing the facts: Firstly I havn't hacked anybody's video, the photo was a still photographic frame & not downloaded from Bob's video.

Secondly i'm not trying to pass anything off that's fake.

Thirdly the frame in question according to said Mr Dean is allegedly from the Japanese Space Agency; who, allegedly bought copies of said film rolls from Nasa before Nasa allegedly lost there copies!

Now you're up to speed perhaps you'd like to apologise & stop gobbing off without knowing the facts!?

There's a moron like you at most sites - like to run the pond & get a kick from it. Life's too short i'm leaving.

To Admin: I've deleted my documentary from the database...
Image

Super Moderator
Online
User avatar
Posts: 17814
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: babysitting

PostThu Jul 04, 2013 8:58 pm » by The57ironman


WillEase666 wrote:
I hate to say this...
But the gullibility involved in accepting this obscure nonsense is quite frankly disturbing.


(I am the last person you want to try to pass off fake NASA ufos to.)


By the way, if you are going to hack someone elses video, at least give them credit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 9M#at=1630

.

.......you just lost a shitload of credibility Will......

with me anyway..


Image
.






..... If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.......
.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9608
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostFri Jul 05, 2013 12:31 am » by *WillEase*


Dear Mac,
I apologize for the wording of my previous post. It was not my wish to come across as rude as it did.
I believe you when you say you used pictures in your video and not a segment of his video.
If anyone is a hack, it would be him. Fact is many of the photos from your video are good unexplained anomalies that I have featured on my thread.
I assumed you wanted to get to the truth if there was an explanation to the images therein, which I could have presented in a nicer way. So again, I apologize for that.

There are many things astronauts have seen, taken pictures of, and videotaped that NASA has no explanation for. Sometimes they down right lie or cover up information such is the case for the Skylab incident. They claimed it was a Russian booster rocket that was a few thousand miles away...as if.

May I suggest you verify the images yourself, and then provide links.
Happy hunting,
Will


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook