How to Argue with Feminists

Tue May 24, 2011 4:49 pm » by **Harbin**

How to Argue with Feminists: Use Facts, True or Not

By RI Canuck

Arguing with a feminist or any other type of woman is an exercise in frustration, because women feel. Rationality does not work. The subject will be changed. She is never at fault, and if she is it is because of something a man did. Do not try to use logic or rationality, the only thing that can sway them is their feelings. They are the more empathetic sex, don’t you know. When a man has to say that he is the boss, he is not. When women say they are empathetic, they are not. They are also herd animals, it is important to show their independence by doing the same things and feeling the same things as their girlfriends. They are not bad or evil, they are just women.

So to argue with a feminist, do not use persuasion, do not try to rationally change their minds, do not share your own feelings, remain confident, cool, collected, and never show hurt or anger. I know that those who are discovering the truth will find the last part very difficult.

The following is an attempt to provide a script to dissuade women from following feminism, and to shake their confidence in revealed slogans. It may be re-used without attribution for those who so wish. Your comments for improvement are welcome. Those who wish to create additional scripts are encouraged to do so:

I am supportive of feminism. Feminism since the late sixties and early seventies, has achieved momentous accomplishments and social changes. Women are in control of their reproductive rights and have freedom of choice. Women are no longer expected to stay in the kitchen and churn out babies. Women can pursue higher education to reach their full capacities and achieve fulfillment. Women have broken into the man’s work world and exercise power in the corporate and government world.

Don’t you agree that the achievements and social revolution wrought be feminism can never be overturned? That society will never return to the male breadwinner and stay-at-home housewife model of the 50’s?

Yes, you agree?

Good.

Now we can tell the truth about feminism, because it can’t be undone.

During the fifties a generation and a half of women who struggled during the great depression, manned the factories during World War II while the men were overseas, were the first time able to have their own homes, and their own kitchens. A lot of men discovered that many of these women separated from their extended female kin were incompetent to be left unsupervised in the home and kitchen.

What were men to do?

The need was to get women out of the home where they had the potential to destroy a man’s wealth accumulation. The solution was to convince the incompetent women that they were unfulfilled and missing out on the exciting lives that men had. So there was a mass exodus of women into the work force in search of fulfillment. The fact that so many career women continue to complain about being unfulfilled, but if they just work more outside the home they will be fulfilled, indicates that women easily deceive themselves.

For us in the patriarchy, our houses and kitchens are safe, now that they are free of incompetent women.

Now about ‘pro-choice’. Do you think we allowed abortion on demand to give you freedom? We encouraged it, because we are very particular about what type of birth canal we want our sons to come from.

Do you think these slut-walks are empowering? We planned them, as a means to let the unworthy women show themselves.

Now that it is too late to turn back the clock, we men can tell the truth. Feminists are but putty in the paws of the patriarchy.

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/05/21/how-to-argue-with-feminists-use-facts-true-or-not/

Tue May 24, 2011 4:55 pm » by **99socks**

Dude, that belongs in the laugh thread....

Now that it is too late to turn back the clock, we men can tell the truth. Feminists are but putty in the paws of the patriarchy.

Except... that was not a secret. :mrgreen:

The problem, is that we've been trying to use logic and rationality to explain that to feminists for decades now. :lol:

Tue May 24, 2011 5:03 pm » by **Spock**

Won't catch anyone whacking off to these chics.

Tue May 24, 2011 5:10 pm » by **Boondox681**

keep it simple :flop:

Tue May 24, 2011 5:13 pm » by **99socks**

spock wrote:Won't catch anyone whacking off to these chics.

What's wrong with that one???

Tue May 24, 2011 5:17 pm » by **The57ironman**

ughh.......... :vomit:

No. 135 of 365 Ways to Drive a Liberal Crazy
Find a feminist and see if she has a sense of humor:

Q: How many men does it take to open a beer?

A: None. It should be open when she brings it to you.

Tue May 24, 2011 5:57 pm » by **Spock**

99socks wrote:What's wrong with that one???

The way she thinks.

Tue May 24, 2011 6:33 pm » by **Zegtelzegtel**

Rationality does not work.

stop trying so negative guys, there are also nice sides on half lesbian girls..

Tue May 24, 2011 6:52 pm » by **Harbin**

Gawd... What a de-railer there with Janine Garofalo, though I'd hang out with her.
Inside the mind of the DTV'er...

Tue May 24, 2011 7:01 pm » by **Domeika**

spock wrote:
99socks wrote:What's wrong with that one???

The way she thinks.

She thinks?
I think you're giving her too much credit. When asked about why she didn't think it was neccessary to protest Clinton's wars she replied that it wasn't "hip" to protest Clinton. Whoaaaakay then Miss Garafolo.....no hypocrisy on parade here...move along. :roll: