How to fake the Japan Tsunami (The age of Image Fakery)

[The57ironman Profile]

you can thank "eddie bernays" for the ritual of television.....

[Myleso Profile Website]

http://fairewinds.com/news

http://fairewinds.com/content/contact-us

[Mrmcnuggets Profile]

You are right, though he does nothing to prove the legitmitacy of them being manufactured images in todays day and age, and in fact, the originals look nothing like any CGI we can make today.
This is a real picture, made to look like a model scape.

This is a vector art/gradient filler picture. ( the realest way to make images, this is what my bro does.)


Now, if you can distinctly support that they are non animate human figures, or a vector art image with beyond human skills in blending the foreground and background images (something we still obviously lack on if we can distinct green screen scenes from regular, or tell if a background is a painted wall.)

If you cant, and how ever like to use methods like this to convey your idea, I suggest giving up on life completely.

You obviously have no idea how images can be constructed, nor how to tell the distinction between telling if a vector art image is real, or not.

I rest my case there. Frutty has been here for what? For how long? and where is one post with some actual statistical numbers please so we can skip this picture bullshit? Oh he doesn't have one you say... that's odd. That would make him a pretty non credible source.

I hope you can clearly see the distinction between the top (1st) real image, the following fake ones, and then the gif from the moon photos(and the Japan floods. CGI ). We still cannot produce a 100% fully acceptable tooo good to be true image, with out some hint to cgi and enhancements. So there is no way to even think, that back in the day nasa made an image of such "realness"(as frut would put it.) that would be accepted then, let alone NOW. Period.

Now I admit that, to my knowledge, we indeed do not have the technology to completely generate the Japanese flood with computers.
But look at a movie like Avatar. CGI looks pretty cool in there already.
And when it's not made with CGI, it can all be staged. There's numerous disaster footage from Hollywood where it's hard to tell 'real' from 'staged'. I'm not saying that the Japanese flood was staged, but I'm just pointing to the fact that it's not impossible to do so.

Bruce Almighty walked on water, Gandalf ran through the 'big city' Minas Tirith, which was just a scale model and Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet 'really' stood on a sinking ship.


Staging and CGI combined can bring incredible results. And there are people in Hollywood that get paid enormously for their skills. And it ain't without a reason.

So, again, I'm not saying the tsunami was fake, I'm just saying it ain't impossible to fake it.


But I must admit: It's really silly/stupid to keep requoting your own posts. If we didn't read them the first time, we won't read them the second. And if we did read it, we don't need to see it again.

You need to take a college level film critique and visual effects class. LOTR for the scenes of them moving on the ground was shot.. on the ground. Half the fuckin movie was flimed of them running around new zealand in actual sets, or scenes, and that is where they built Rohan. They built that whole town because they knew they could not make a convincing cgi of it.

You think all the mordor armies reflected realness? LMFAO, then you should just give up too.


watch that video to see they ALSO constructed Minis Tirith for ANY set shots(non arial).

AND was the same place, and same set pieces they used to make Helms Deep.

Anything else?

My brother went to college for this shit, spent 48 thousand to understand how movies are made, frut has no idea, and was probably hysterically happy about this one post you made, yet little do both of you know all of the sets were actually made.

Theres your lunch scraps frut. Goblin guts, from your assistant.

and btw, hollywood cgi artists make garbage compared to the payroll of the rest of the necessities to make a movie. You know it took 50,000 people, and 3-5 months to make ONE battle scene in star wars 3(the scene lasted less than a minute too... )? That still reflected heaps and heaps of CGI when it was finished..

[Frutty Profile]

@nuggest you know what today I am in a good mood and read through your bunch of malarkey. you made me smile.. thx

[Mrmcnuggets Profile]

the only malarky here is the words that come out of your mouth frut that hold no structural soundness to anything.

[Frutty Profile]

the only malarky here is the words that come out of your mouth frut that hold no structural soundness to anything.

whatever

[Mrmcnuggets Profile]

the only malarky here is the words that come out of your mouth frut that hold no structural soundness to anything.

whatever

at least everything that I state has facts to back it up and makes more sense than you starting to act like chef Boyardee at the Olive garden.

[Frutty Profile]

the only malarky here is the words that come out of your mouth frut that hold no structural soundness to anything.

whatever

at least everything that I state has facts to back it up and makes more sense than you starting to act like chef Boyardee at the Olive garden.

yes yes, I'll give you that

[Nakchopoe Profile]

You need to take a college level film critique and visual effects class. LOTR for the scenes of them moving on the ground was shot.. on the ground. Half the fuckin movie was flimed of them running around new zealand in actual sets, or scenes, and that is where they built Rohan. They built that whole town because they knew they could not make a convincing cgi of it.

You think all the mordor armies reflected realness? LMFAO, then you should just give up too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8LmQrOSnHU
watch that video to see they ALSO constructed Minis Tirith for ANY set shots(non arial).

AND was the same place, and same set pieces they used to make Helms Deep.

Anything else?

My brother went to college for this shit, spent 48 thousand to understand how movies are made, frut has no idea, and was probably hysterically happy about this one post you made, yet little do both of you know all of the sets were actually made.

Theres your lunch scraps frut. Goblin guts, from your assistant.

and btw, hollywood cgi artists make garbage compared to the payroll of the rest of the necessities to make a movie. You know it took 50,000 people, and 3-5 months to make ONE battle scene in star wars 3(the scene lasted less than a minute too... )? That still reflected heaps and heaps of CGI when it was finished..

Star Wars 3 was from 2005, 2 years before the first iPhone was released.

The thing of Minas Tirith does show that scale models were used. And the first post of this thread does contain some aerial shots, so it could be scaled. (Again, not saying it has been)

There are doctors that spend way over 48 thousand to understand how medicine work, yet they still believe hemp has no use and pharmaceuticals do.

You bring very strong arguments, but it still doesn't completely rule out the possibility of faking tsunami images.

[Frutty Profile]

This video was posted by nuggest ...

I watched it once ... it was convincing

Then I watched it several more times rewinding and stopping just before the clips were edited. (Don't know the origin of the video or whether it was boradcast on tv)



I find it very difficult to believe the traffic on the bridge seems to be ignorant of what is happening around them, and the approaching yacht that is about to take the bridge apart ... before it;s edited out. Other scenes don;t match the same locations.

The whirlpool of debris swirling around and water overflowing the damn is kind of less convincing the more you loop though it.

Just saying