Hubble captures images of Apollo 17 landing site

Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:44 am » by **Frutty**

will69ease wrote:This is idiotic. If you are standing in front of the LM and take a picture, then move a hundred feet to your left and take another picture, the mountains in the background will not change...just the foreground. For that matter, if you moved a hundred feet towards the mountains instead, the LM will simply be behind you.

Move all you want Willy Grease. Those are panoramic photos, which means they cover 360 degrees around the vantage point from where they were taken.

The conclusion still holds true. we can see the Massives (disinformation) in the background with bear the rock and without bear the rock , with the Apollo Module and without the Apollo Module). How can that be?

The dream is over guys :nails:

Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:39 am » by **Will69ease**

The Apollo Surface Panoramas are made by attaching surface images together side by side and are not 360 degrees.
For an example, the image above with the LEM was made with frames AS17-147-22493 thru AS17-147-22521
If there was a 360 degree panoramas, you would be able to overlap the edges...which you cannot in this case.

Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:03 am » by **Will69ease**

By the way...
Can Hubble see the Apollo landing sites on the Moon?

No, Hubble cannot take photos of the Apollo landing sites.

An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot.

http://hubblesite.org/reference_desk/fa ... cat=topten

Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:52 am » by **Smokeydog**

will69ease wrote:By the way...
Can Hubble see the Apollo landing sites on the Moon?

No, Hubble cannot take photos of the Apollo landing sites.

An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot.

http://hubblesite.org/reference_desk/fa ... cat=topten

oh thats convient maybe it cant see it cuz theres nothing there lol

Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:25 am » by **Will69ease**

Here's a pretty good one of Apollo 14's landing site...

Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:22 am » by **Ahbotha**

I have always asked, how come no clear photos of the Moon ?
1970 One giant leap for mankind from black and white photos to clear color ?
Hubble cannot take clear photos, yet it can pick out a match lit Thrillion miles away ?
YES, WE LANDED, NOT, WE DID NOT ! Mis-information by our Governments, t keep us away from the truth !
We never landed and we never did what we said we did, eg 365,0000 miles from the Moon and Buzz states how far they are, and three hours later they land on the Moon ??? SOme big Bull sh.t !

Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:28 am » by **Canubis**

i like to notice how nasa always photo out the stars with a big black map..

and if Hubble took such shocking poor images of our moon i would be horrified at the quality it presumes to send back of the cosmos but they are presented as 100,000xy pixels HD lol that brings bak old memory's

http://www.disclose.tv/forum/our-moon-wot-are-these-t14618.html

thats nothing to do with the lens, it would be smeared on all images and get worse on all images....its realy there on "NASAs" moon

in this image is 4 images linked together as the lens passed over it lol not a fingerprint or ice crystels or bacteria on the lens..get with it

Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:39 pm » by **Frutty**

APOLLO 14 "LANDING SITE"

Needless to say those ain't no Apollo remains :hell:

Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:32 am » by **Frutty**

THE ADVENTURES OF APOLLO 14 IN THE GROTTO OF THE DEVIL

Sat Aug 06, 2011 4:39 am » by **Frutty**

Apollo 15 landing site