Hubble captures images of Apollo 17 landing site

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3454
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:35 am

PostMon Aug 01, 2011 2:35 am » by Frutty


The story that Hubble cannot take pictures of the moon because blah blah blah blah is easily refuted by giving a link of the Apollo 17 landing site as seen by Hubble

Image

Available at http://hubblesite.org/gallery/album/pr2005029g/

I also happened to have the picture they already replaced with the b&w one above. I immediately uploaded it when I saw it was replaced.

Lo and behold!

Image


The identifiers for the photos are the same, to wit hs-2005-29m and hs-2005-29g

:hiho:
ImageImageImageImage
Image
Deception in life is nothing but a lie reduced to practice

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 11034
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:08 am

PostMon Aug 01, 2011 4:30 am » by Boondox681


with today's technology,photos and videos not longer have any credibility or validity.
everybody,together....
yeaaaa technology :top:

and just because the 'official' hubble site posts some picture what could literally be anything,
doesn't mean that's proof of anything.

i didn't get where i'm at today by listening to gov't run organizations :D

peace
Image
"You wanna' keep it real take a walk out your door,that's as real as it gets from the sky to the floor."

Initiate
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:29 am

PostMon Aug 01, 2011 9:18 am » by Yarblis


boondox681 wrote:with today's technology,photos and videos not longer have any credibility or validity.
everybody,together....
yeaaaa technology :top:

and just because the 'official' hubble site posts some picture what could literally be anything,
doesn't mean that's proof of anything.

i didn't get where i'm at today by listening to gov't run organizations :D

peace

boondox said it boys.I ain't impressed by any pictures from nasa either

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 4742
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 11:32 pm

PostMon Aug 01, 2011 9:26 am » by Will69ease


Maybe it's just me, but where is the lander in the pictures?

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3380
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:50 pm
Location: 2 Thirds Down The Bottle

PostMon Aug 01, 2011 10:45 am » by Toxic32


I think his point being is that Hubble can take pictures of the moon.
I question everything. I don't believe anything I'm told or anything I see. Prove it, or fuck off. And that's not me I see in the mirror in the morning.

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 11034
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:08 am

PostMon Aug 01, 2011 3:33 pm » by Boondox681


I think his point being is that Hubble can take pictures of the moon.

big deal.so can i.
and why now?
what..did it take them 20 years to figure out how to turn it around to face the moon?
highly unimpressive.
this picture looks like my bathroom tile.
Image
"You wanna' keep it real take a walk out your door,that's as real as it gets from the sky to the floor."

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7028
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:39 am

PostMon Aug 01, 2011 3:39 pm » by E6722maj


will69ease wrote:Maybe it's just me, but where is the lander in the pictures?


it's in a hanger in nevada.

.
whatever

Conspirator
Posts: 1777
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:21 pm

PostMon Aug 01, 2011 3:41 pm » by Nihilgeist


will69ease wrote:Maybe it's just me, but where is the lander in the pictures?


I was thinking the same thing. What am I supposed to be seeing in these pictures exactly?

I see no evidence of the landing, not that I believe the Hubble can't take pics of the moon, nor am I a moon landing hoax believer.
Five Finger Death Punch
"I'd rather you hate me, for everything I am than ever love me, for something that I'm not."

Lowsix wrote:Seriously dude..you're trash.
Always have been.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3454
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:35 am

PostTue Aug 02, 2011 1:49 am » by Frutty


Some answers and thoughts


    This is the first time that more than a handful of people is aware that the Hubble telescope can take photographs of the Moon. The implications are … long to enumerate

    This is the only photograph in color of any Apollo alleged landings site (the one not available now)

    This region in the b&W pic is called the region of the Littrow Mountains

    The blue region (in the colored pic which I anonated next), behind the towering sculptured matterhorn, is known as the Taurus Littrow Valley, the place were Apollo 17 chose to land

    “Because it had geologic features promising a varied collection of images, samples, and other data from both ancient highland and younger volcanic areas” according to the Encyclopedia Britannica

    The upper red arrow shows the exact spot where the Apollo 17 mission supposedly landed.

    Find the corresponding region the second red arrow points to in the black and white pic, that was hidden in the black bands in the colored one. There is an effigy there – there are more effigies around but it’s difficult to make out, this is an alien land.

    The Littrow Valley has been also known throughout astronomy history to be one of the epicenters of unexplained luminous phenomenon observed several times in the last centuries by prestigious astronomers.

    This is most important: The supposed landing site -- without enhancement as I know there are some constructions around that spot – and in fact all around the area happens to be in a cliff. – work that out yourself.


Image

Hope this is food for thought.


I will be back with more info, if people get interested
Last edited by Frutty on Tue Aug 02, 2011 1:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
ImageImageImageImage
Image
Deception in life is nothing but a lie reduced to practice

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3454
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:35 am

PostTue Aug 02, 2011 1:53 am » by Frutty


Oops I correct myself there's a color picture of the Apollo 11 landing site too, but let's go in little steps

:lol:
ImageImageImageImage
Image
Deception in life is nothing but a lie reduced to practice


Next

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook