Huge victory against GMOs

Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:11 pm » by **Drjones**

Huge victory against GMOs as Monsanto driven out of the UK by consumer protests
http://www.naturalnews.com/034861_GMO_U ... z1lKNxEzZ3 :rtft:

A massive victory against Monsanto and genetically engineered seeds has been achieved in the United Kingdom today. Monsanto has announced a total withdrawal from the UK, shuttering its Cambridge-based wheat production operation. UK newspaper Daily Mail was instrumental in promoting opposition against Monsanto through its "Frankenstein Foods" educational campaign.

A celebration is in order i feel. This IS a MASSIVE result, biggest in YEARS, since i became conscious of world affairs. :dancing:

Daily Mail article- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... klash.html :rtft:

'Earlier this week it was revealed that the Government's own research had found that GM farming would pollute the countryside for generations.' :clapper:

OK, Daily Mail article if from 2003, right ? :headscratch:

Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:39 pm » by **Muchtyman**

Google " monsanto quits britain " quite a few hits , but they all reference that old Daily Mail article .

Nothing in the financial press or anything current , I wouldn't start doing high fives as yet jonesy .

Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:10 pm » by **Drjones**

muchtyman wrote:Google " monsanto quits britain " quite a few hits , but they all reference that old Daily Mail article .

Nothing in the financial press or anything current , I wouldn't start doing high fives as yet jonesy .

I know mate, i jumped on this, normally natural news are accurate and upto date.
BUT you are correct this is all referencing the 2003 Daily Mail article, somewhat bizzarre, is'nt it ? This in itself requires investigation. Mike Adams said in his article that TODAY the UK won a huge victory against gmo's. It's not like Mike to make a mistake from my experience with him, interesting. :think:

Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:40 pm » by **Svaha**

(NaturalNews) Editor's note: We regret to inform our readers that this story is based on a Daily Mail article that we have now been informed is from 2003, not 2012. In their own search engine, Daily Mail mistakenly listed their own story as being published on February 3, 2012. We have a screen capture of this search to prove this, taken from the Daily Mail's website search engine:

Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:18 pm » by **Drjones**

svaha wrote:(NaturalNews) Editor's note: We regret to inform our readers that this story is based on a Daily Mail article that we have now been informed is from 2003, not 2012. In their own search engine, Daily Mail mistakenly listed their own story as being published on February 3, 2012. We have a screen capture of this search to prove this, taken from the Daily Mail's website search engine:

Excellent mate, thanks. Hmmm... :think: