I dont know what to think about this video...

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:21 am

You might like:

PostSun Aug 02, 2009 4:57 am » by Shatnerswig


LowSix wrote:two things stand out to me.

The artifacting in the sky does not match the detail, smooth detail, on the plane..
Almost like a clearly rendered and unfiltered cgi object imposed over cell phone resolution image.. You can notice when it unfocuses, the blur grain of the craft lights blur smooth, but you can still see the boxy, compression-effected sky..although it blurs too..the textures are not analogous...

And that focus/unfocus trick these guys use to simulate 'autofocus searching' occurs in the wrong places.

For instance it unfocuses several times, when the object is filling all (or most) of the sensors.

The only time it will lose track (99% of the time) is when the object in question is adrift ina large open vision field..say small object against a large sky.
NOT when the object itself has filled the frame in focus already..it wont suddenly LOSE focus on that object, because the sensors have already tracked and locked on it..(and since they are in an array, as long as its been focused on, and doesnt drastically change proportion o fbackground to object, it will stay..or else the function would be totally worthless, and you would see Home movies lose tracking all the time on normal frame filling events..kids blowingout candles on a cake, soccer games...etc

And lastly, i would be screaming at the top of my lungs or at a MINIMUM talking to myself about holy fuck what the fuck jesus christ its reallholyshituckdamn i got this motherfucker on tape....breathing so hard I would peak out the microphone..so im not getting a sense of excitement..more like deliberation..

Thats three strikes i think.

I concur :cheers:
TO BOLDLY GO WHERE NO WIG HAS GONE BEFORE

Writer
User avatar
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:42 am

PostSun Aug 02, 2009 5:28 am » by Chefgordonramsy


What I want to ask is, what has happened to Whitley Streiber? Up until about a year ago, I was under the assumption that everything he posted on his site was authenticated - which it is in the members area. So he opened up an area where people from anywhere could post - I guess for ratings and traffic.

Whitley, as much as I respect the man, has turned into a new-ager meditation guy, with William Henry as a side kick. Mix in a dash of William Hogue, and we have PINDZ.

I hate that I am losing my trust in Whitley.

As far as the video goes. It's Real - no question. :look:
Yu Pig!

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9999
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:36 am

PostSun Aug 02, 2009 5:59 am » by Lowsix


You cant make fun of pindz and say this video is real in the same post.

Not allowed.



(unless of course you were being sarcastic)
Image
warløckmitbladderinfection wrote:blasphemous new gehenna inhabitant makes god sad...

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2004
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:30 am

PostSun Aug 02, 2009 8:13 am » by Darrylmckay


LowSix wrote:You cant make fun of pindz and say this video is real in the same post.

Not allowed.



(unless of course you were being sarcastic)


I think we all have the right to make fun of Pindz as we see fit.

LowSix wrote:(unless of course you were being sarcastic)


Is that the sarcasim font I have been searching for all this time.
I will respect your beliefs*, I will research your beliefs, but dont expect me to believe.
* disclaimer-user makes no commitment to live up to this claim

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 9999
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:36 am

PostSun Aug 02, 2009 8:40 am » by Lowsix


Well, you could put sarcasm tags on.

[sarc]Beacause then we could communicate much more clearly without the help of our eyebrows[/sarc]

But i think for it to work, you have to actually say something sarcastic, and its clear by the inefficiency of my example, that i didnt...
Image
warløckmitbladderinfection wrote:blasphemous new gehenna inhabitant makes god sad...

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2004
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:30 am

PostSun Aug 02, 2009 8:58 am » by Darrylmckay


LowSix wrote:Well, you could put sarcasm tags on


But then I would be sending the message that I thought that people on here were to dumb to recognise sarcasim when they see..............Oh I see your point now.

(sarc) Yeah we are on Disclose after all (sarc) :lol: :lol:
I will respect your beliefs*, I will research your beliefs, but dont expect me to believe.
* disclaimer-user makes no commitment to live up to this claim

Previous
  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

We are listed at the www.topparanormalsites.com website. Click here to vote for us.. Thank you :-)