I dont know what to think about this video...
16 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
- Shatnerswig

-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:21 am
You might like:
LowSix wrote:two things stand out to me.
The artifacting in the sky does not match the detail, smooth detail, on the plane..
Almost like a clearly rendered and unfiltered cgi object imposed over cell phone resolution image.. You can notice when it unfocuses, the blur grain of the craft lights blur smooth, but you can still see the boxy, compression-effected sky..although it blurs too..the textures are not analogous...
And that focus/unfocus trick these guys use to simulate 'autofocus searching' occurs in the wrong places.
For instance it unfocuses several times, when the object is filling all (or most) of the sensors.
The only time it will lose track (99% of the time) is when the object in question is adrift ina large open vision field..say small object against a large sky.
NOT when the object itself has filled the frame in focus already..it wont suddenly LOSE focus on that object, because the sensors have already tracked and locked on it..(and since they are in an array, as long as its been focused on, and doesnt drastically change proportion o fbackground to object, it will stay..or else the function would be totally worthless, and you would see Home movies lose tracking all the time on normal frame filling events..kids blowingout candles on a cake, soccer games...etc
And lastly, i would be screaming at the top of my lungs or at a MINIMUM talking to myself about holy fuck what the fuck jesus christ its reallholyshituckdamn i got this motherfucker on tape....breathing so hard I would peak out the microphone..so im not getting a sense of excitement..more like deliberation..
Thats three strikes i think.
I concur

TO BOLDLY GO WHERE NO WIG HAS GONE BEFORE
- Chefgordonramsy

-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:42 am
What I want to ask is, what has happened to Whitley Streiber? Up until about a year ago, I was under the assumption that everything he posted on his site was authenticated - which it is in the members area. So he opened up an area where people from anywhere could post - I guess for ratings and traffic.
Whitley, as much as I respect the man, has turned into a new-ager meditation guy, with William Henry as a side kick. Mix in a dash of William Hogue, and we have PINDZ.
I hate that I am losing my trust in Whitley.
As far as the video goes. It's Real - no question.
Whitley, as much as I respect the man, has turned into a new-ager meditation guy, with William Henry as a side kick. Mix in a dash of William Hogue, and we have PINDZ.
I hate that I am losing my trust in Whitley.
As far as the video goes. It's Real - no question.

Yu Pig!
- Darrylmckay

-
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:30 am
LowSix wrote:You cant make fun of pindz and say this video is real in the same post.
Not allowed.
(unless of course you were being sarcastic)
I think we all have the right to make fun of Pindz as we see fit.
LowSix wrote:(unless of course you were being sarcastic)
Is that the sarcasim font I have been searching for all this time.
I will respect your beliefs*, I will research your beliefs, but dont expect me to believe.
* disclaimer-user makes no commitment to live up to this claim
* disclaimer-user makes no commitment to live up to this claim
Well, you could put sarcasm tags on.
[sarc]Beacause then we could communicate much more clearly without the help of our eyebrows[/sarc]
But i think for it to work, you have to actually say something sarcastic, and its clear by the inefficiency of my example, that i didnt...
[sarc]Beacause then we could communicate much more clearly without the help of our eyebrows[/sarc]
But i think for it to work, you have to actually say something sarcastic, and its clear by the inefficiency of my example, that i didnt...

warløckmitbladderinfection wrote:blasphemous new gehenna inhabitant makes god sad...
- Darrylmckay

-
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:30 am
LowSix wrote:Well, you could put sarcasm tags on
But then I would be sending the message that I thought that people on here were to dumb to recognise sarcasim when they see..............Oh I see your point now.
(sarc) Yeah we are on Disclose after all (sarc)
I will respect your beliefs*, I will research your beliefs, but dont expect me to believe.
* disclaimer-user makes no commitment to live up to this claim
* disclaimer-user makes no commitment to live up to this claim
16 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- if this is not a ufo then i dont what a ufo is
1, 2by demobe » Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:04 pm - 11 Replies
- 681 Views
- Last post by papermoon

Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:06 pm
- if this is not a ufo then i dont what a ufo is
-
- hi dont look
by overons » Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:39 am - 4 Replies
- 472 Views
- Last post by 420rider

Thu Dec 29, 2011 4:54 pm
- hi dont look
-
- They dont exist !
1, 2, 3by modcos » Sat May 02, 2009 11:00 pm - 26 Replies
- 742 Views
- Last post by little1spice

Wed May 06, 2009 9:01 pm
- They dont exist !
-
- girlfriends and ufos dont go,lol
1, 2by brillbilly » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:00 pm - 12 Replies
- 309 Views
- Last post by brillbilly

Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:33 am
- girlfriends and ufos dont go,lol
-
- UFOS & the people who dont believe in them
by temps13 » Tue Nov 15, 2011 5:34 am - 0 Replies
- 112 Views
- Last post by temps13

Tue Nov 15, 2011 5:34 am
- UFOS & the people who dont believe in them


