I dont know what to think about this video...

[Realorfake Profile]

Not sure if this has been posted here before.

I know some of us here on DTV can play around with vids, piece them apart, take snapshots and snapshorts of the original vid....would that help in this case??

Its a quick vid

The writeup and link to original article is below with youtube video underneath....

http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=4415

Triangular UFOs Seen Over Paris
09-Feb-2005


Click to Enlarge In an eerie reprise of one of the world's great UFO flaps, the Belgian incidents of 1989, a huge triangular object was observed over Paris two nights ago. The object, recreated here by French UFO observer Mathieu Cozanet, was seen at about 9:50 PM, moving slowly through the night sky at almost rooftop altitude. The witness was in a small public park at the corner of Rue d'Alesia and Rue Vercingeton in the 1st Arrondissment. It was a dark and, for Paris, unusually clear night, and he chanced to look up to see the stars. At that moment, he saw the craft, just visible against the night sky, moving across the Rue Vercingeton and disappearing over the roofs of buildings, as shown in Mr. Cozanet's recreation. Unfortunately, the other person present was looking in another direction and did not see anything.
On June 30, 2004, another witness in Paris observed a triangular object, lit with a white light at each corner and a red one in the center, passing silently overhead. Shortly thereafter a second triangle appeared, this one brightly lit, and remained visible for a few seconds.

A National Institute of Discovery Science assessment published in 2004 stated that "the United States is currently experiencing a wave of Flying Triangle sightings that may have intensified in the 1990s, especially towards the latter part of the 1990s. The wave continues. The Flying Triangles are being openly deployed over and near population centers, including in the vicinity of major Interstate Highways."

While it went on to say that "neither the agenda nor the origin of the Flying Triangles are currently known," it also pointed out that the eyewitness observations were consistent with the routine and open deployment of an "unacknowledged advanced" aircraft by the Department of Defense--or the open deployment of something not under the control of the US government. It concluded that "in the post 9/11 era...it is certainly conceivable that deployment of low altitude surveillance platforms is routine and open."

The triangles have been observed by witnesses worldwide since the 1950s, which mitigates against their being secret US aircraft. In his article for UFOevidence.org, investigator and scholar Richard Dolan describes a typical early black triangle case: "On a clear fall night in Hastings, Minnesota, multiple witnesses saw a triangular craft approach from the east at a high rate of speed. When it was nearly overhead at about 5,000 feet, it "stopped dead in its tracks. The object had a reddish orange light at each of its corners; these lights sometimes turned greenish. It sat motionless and silent for half a minute, then made a slow 180 degree turn, "leaving a vapor trail." It then sat motionless for a few seconds before it took off at an amazing speed. It stopped dead at a point about 15 miles away from them. It then lifted straight up "at incredible speed" and was gone.

This excellent multiple witness sighting suggests capabilities for this aircraft that may not have been available to earthly technologies in the 1960s, and credible reports of the triangles go back as far as the 1950s.

To read Space.com's report on the NIDS assessment, click here. To read Richard Dolan's report for UFOEvidence, click here.

In the past, sightings of these objects have tended to take place in clusters, and it will be worth noting if further observations take place at this point in Europe.

To read Mr. Cozanet's description of the recent Paris sighting and see his recreations, click here.

Where else would you read a story like this? Keep unknowncountry going? subscribe today! And learn how the sighting of an incredible twelve-foot-tall creature from a crashed craft who terrorized a town in Virginia.

[Pindz Profile Website]

i say fake ......... camera movement and the end of the video lol......

[Realorfake Profile]

i say fake ......... camera movement and the end of the video lol......

http://tr-3b.com/

[Pindz Profile Website]

i say fake ......... camera movement and the end of the video lol......

http://tr-3b.com/

yeah it probably exist , never seen that in our skies, but seen there Hundreds of Other Objects - Not Planes .........

[Nosubstanze Profile]

I say fake at about 34 secs the city is out of focus and the object is sharply in focus ... which if it was a large object flying above it should appear to share the same focus.. either that or the object is tiny and right in front of the camera or it's poorly thought out CGI.

[Realorfake Profile]

I say fake at about 34 secs the city is out of focus and the object is sharply in focus ... which if it was a large object flying above it should appear to share the same focus.. either that or the object is tiny and right in front of the camera or it's poorly thought out CGI.

Eh, actually if this is CGI its REALLY good cgi - not poorly thought out.

Also, the flash as the very end is said to be a horizontal single plane flash, not a full bright illuminating flash.

The vid looks fakeable but looks like it could be a real one too...

[Hesop Profile]

Isn't it stated in the description?

The object, recreated here by French UFO observer.....

[Lowsix Profile]

Isn't it stated in the description?

The object, recreated here by French UFO observer.....

o snap.

[Realorfake Profile]

Isn't it stated in the description?

The object, recreated here by French UFO observer.....

o snap.

The "created here" was referring to the small picture to the left of the article.

Click on the link in my original post...
heres the pic..............obviously, recreated.

[Lowsix Profile]

two things stand out to me.

The artifacting in the sky does not match the detail, smooth detail, on the plane..
Almost like a clearly rendered and unfiltered cgi object imposed over cell phone resolution image.. You can notice when it unfocuses, the blur grain of the craft lights blur smooth, but you can still see the boxy, compression-effected sky..although it blurs too..the textures are not analogous...

And that focus/unfocus trick these guys use to simulate 'autofocus searching' occurs in the wrong places.

For instance it unfocuses several times, when the object is filling all (or most) of the sensors.

The only time it will lose track (99% of the time) is when the object in question is adrift ina large open vision field..say small object against a large sky.
NOT when the object itself has filled the frame in focus already..it wont suddenly LOSE focus on that object, because the sensors have already tracked and locked on it..(and since they are in an array, as long as its been focused on, and doesnt drastically change proportion o fbackground to object, it will stay..or else the function would be totally worthless, and you would see Home movies lose tracking all the time on normal frame filling events..kids blowingout candles on a cake, soccer games...etc

And lastly, i would be screaming at the top of my lungs or at a MINIMUM talking to myself about holy fuck what the fuck jesus christ its reallholyshituckdamn i got this motherfucker on tape....breathing so hard I would peak out the microphone..so im not getting a sense of excitement..more like deliberation..

Thats three strikes i think.