TheDuck wrote:I'm down with helping with this wiki thing if we wanna do it, will be fun trying to agree on facts but yeah anythings worth a try...
We mentioned radio earlier so I went and made a test station lol
Kinda messed up a little after the first track but yeah I got a bit better after a while...
http://www.spreaker.com/show/the_john_smith_show_12 (30 mins)
I don't have a radio voice or radio mind so you're lucky I kept it kinda clean and didn't turn into turrets boy
I just about jizzed myself
I don't plan on doing anymore, I made that to inspire others to show its fairly easy to do if someone wanted to do a regular broadcast.
So go for it if you want... If you need a hand I'll help but I don't think you will.
It would probably be best to write scripts for some of the show I reckon.
But anyway... Meh.
"The Truth Cannot Be Told... It Must Be Realized"
It is hard finding "verifiable" facts, you know facts that have some proof posted with them as oposed to articles where you have "...scientists said that the measurement was,...".
Articles without verifiable photographic proof are just articles, not some fact that you can link to and call it a fact (just cause they said so,.. the media).
WIKI is a nice idea, but who checks the "facts" people write in those articles?
And tries to prove these assertions/claims with scientific facts.
- Posts: 3335
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:51 pm
- Location: Questioning Building 7,.......... Stop HAARP ..........Stop HydroFracking
For example Mitt says "Why don't they put windows in the planes in case of smoke".
Did he say it or not? Was he joking or not? Well? You could go on for days.
We are not on a witch hunt. Vulcanic is Just sayin let's keep it real as we can. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
I'm not sure we need PHD's in Quantum fluid interaction with inter-dimensional phased effects on time streams. Specializing in applying the theoretical experiment distribution of probabilities. (I could be wrong though)
Disclosetv wrote:Vulcanic wrote:I have what i feel is a great idea for this site I'm not sure if it is possible to even do but i atleast want to run the idea by you all.
This idea comes from the ancient aliens debunked video as we all were shuffling for the (real facts)
Could DTV have a FACT CHECKING section? Only facts about DTV Subjects maybe built like wikki where we all give imput and it can be disputed and checked for the truth?
DTV Does offer the TRUTH and to have a fact checker here would be very valuable, watch a video have question find out all on the same site, i don't think any paranormal site out there offers that but then again DTV stands out because we seek truth not make people believe in lies.
I'm curious what Lukas and mods and users think of this idea and if it's even possible?
Well, I could imagine a kind of DTV Truth Wiki (edited by the DTV useres themselves) by using one of these solutions:
This would give some big topics more depth (facts vs fiction) indeed and cross-linking back to videos, forum discussions etc would be possible. What do you think?
Disclose.tv Site Admin
yeah that would be really cool
My YouTube Channel :
- Related topics
- Last post