If lie detectors are never wrong then...

[whitedeath Profile]

That means these events happened how they were told.

The Travis Walton Abduction



Out of the six witnesses, Allen Dalis, Dwayne Smith, John Goulette, Kenneth Peterson, Mike Rogers, and Steve Pierce. Five passed and one was inconclusive.

Since his "return" Travis Walton has passed several lie detector tests.



The "Original" Sasquatch video was definitely a fake



A man named Bob Heironimus came forward to debunk the film's authenticity by claiming that he was the man inside the costume in the film.
In 2005, Heironimus passed a lie detector challenging his assertions.



The Calvin Parker and Charles Hickson abduction.

Calvin Parker and Charles Hickson were fishing from a pier at Shaupeter Shipyard on the Pascagoula River at Pascagoula, Mississippi. At about 7:00 p.m., they suddenly realized that something was behind them.

A machine was making a buzzing noise. It was an oval-shaped object with a blue light on it. As they watched, a hatchway opened and three strange entities floated out. Hickson later said: They didn't have clothes. But they had feet shape... it was more or less a round like thing on a leg, if you'd call it a leg.... Calvin done went hysterical on me

A police investigation failed to crack Parker and Hickson's story. They passed a lie detector test. They were interviewed in the days after the event by Ufologists Dr. James Harder of APRO and Dr. Allen Hynek, both of whom vouched for their sincerity. Hickson later revealed that he had turned down a huge sum of money for a book and movie based on the experience.



Johnny Sands, Aliens & Men In Black


Johnny Sands, a country-western singer living in Las Vegas, saw a 60-foot craft at about 1000 feet altitude, shaped like the Goodyear blimp, with portholes around the circumference. The object appeared to land, and Sands then saw two figures approaching. Then, he "froze" -- he wanted to move, but he couldn't. The figures came near him, to about three feet away.

"1. On January 29th, did you see two strange figures in the desert? Answer: Yes

"2. Did you communicate with these strange figures? Answer: Yes.

"3. Did these strange figures tell you that they would see you again? Answer: Yes.

"4. Were you under the influence of. anything at the time of this meeting? Answer: No.

"5. Regarding what happened on Thursday, January 29, have you told the truth about what you saw that night? Answer: Yes.

"A total of three charts were obtained using the above relevant questions. During these three charts, Mr. Sands indicated an ability to respond automatically to vocal stimuli. His responses in the critical areas were not consistent with deception criteria.

"After careful examination of this subject's polygrams, it is my opinion that Mr. Johnny Sands was truthful in his answers to the above relevant questions. I am not attesting to the truthfulness of the whole story that Mr. Sands has told, only to the veracity of his answers to the above relevant questions."

The Kentucky Abductions

On January 6, 1976, three women were abducted near Stanford, Kentucky. As they were driving together to have dinner, a bright red object appeared in the sky, which Mona Stafford at first thought was an airplane on fire. As the object descended from the right side of the road to a point ahead of them, they could see that it was not an airplane, but a huge object bigger than "two houses."

In July of 1976, Lexington Police Department detective James Young separately gave the three women lie detector tests regarding their experience. They all passed with no problems.

[Truthseekerx Profile]

Polygraph tests are relatively EASY to influence if you know what you're doing. Even when you don't, they often create false positives and negatives.

[Otomon Profile]

A lie detector once told me I was gay,it had to be wrong because I like women.

The lie detector was called "Either you tell the truth or I kick your ass"

[whitedeath Profile]

Polygraph tests are relatively EASY to influence if you know what you're doing. Even when you don't, they often create false positives and negatives.

I understand this, I was bored so thought I'd put something quick together.

Thinking that it's still used in some states in america, still used here in britain sometimes as a tool of truth.

When in fact people can influence the test's results whether lying or not.
So if in certain locations around the world, these are seen as legitimate. Would they then also admit the other tests like these?

[Thesaint Profile]

The authorities will use a polygraph to incriminate were possible and say that they are 95-99 + % accurate but then dismiss them as "not one of the best tools" when it comes to tested evidence in favour of something they want to deny and will not allow them to be used when it could incriminate. The craziest thing is that we are supposed to accept this one sided situation. They can't have it both ways, IMO.



TRUE STORY

AN IDIOT'S IDIOT
Police in Radnor, Pennsylvania, interrogated a suspect by placing a metal colander on his head and connecting it with wires to a photocopy machine. The message "He's lying" was placed in the copier, and police pressed the copy button each time they thought the suspect was telling a lie. Believing the "lie detector" was working, the suspect confessed.

[Torofamily Profile]

Good thread btw.

Yeah I agree Good tread
Whitedeath

just cant completely understand the avatar.........i see the gun and kind of whats holding the gun...........kind a.............what is holding the gun anyways



Funny story Saint

[whitedeath Profile]

Thanks toro, 2020

As for the picture, I probably should put the original up instead of this one that I inverted.
It's a person, who's tale is not widely known.

WhiteDeath, I "borrowed" his nickname.


TheSaint, I agree 100%