insurance companies?

Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:46 am » by **Mydogma**

Does anyone have any good info on if and how insurance companies are involved with the cabel bankers...seems to me the insurance industry is a racket...and must be involved in the cash extraction loop ie who is the insurance company with 911 and silverstien? Why would they have not wanted and demanded scrutiny of the investigations and the blatant emissions of building 7...I don't get it...I know any claims I have put in certianly got scrutinized more than that..??
Anyway I have not found much on the industry but I'm certain the big brokerhouses are owned by the same family tree..

Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:48 am » by **domdabears**

All I know is, that would have been a great business to get in when it started.
Millions of people paying hundreds of dollars monthly and a huge majority of them never even have to use their insurance.

What a fuckin waste.

Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:55 am » by **Mydogma**

domdabears wrote:All I know is, that would have been a great business to get in when it started.
Millions of people paying hundreds of dollars monthly and a huge majority of them never even have to use their insurance.

What a fuckin waste.

Yep and the fukers have it mandated in law that we need it to drive, have a morgage, ride our skidoos...so the gov mandates we pay these pirates and say that its unprofitable for tHe government to sell it instead of private industry? Go figure...insurance companies rape billions from us...I would rather my gov profit from it...but they say they would loose money?

Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:56 am » by **99socks**

mydogma wrote:
domdabears wrote:All I know is, that would have been a great business to get in when it started.
Millions of people paying hundreds of dollars monthly and a huge majority of them never even have to use their insurance.

What a fuckin waste.

Yep and the fukers have it mandated in law that we need it to drive, have a morgage, ride our skidoos...so the gov mandates we pay these pirates and say that its unprofitable for tHe government to sell it instead of private industry? Go figure...insurance companies rape billions from us...I would rather my gov profit from it...but they say they would loose money?

No one MAKES you take a mortgage. :flop:

Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:09 am » by **Noentry**

Insurace brookers are a part of the financial system and is under the control of the "ptb"

The difference with Insurance and banks is you dont have to have a bank account.
There is no law .
But it you own a home or a car by law you must have insurance.

Insurance is one of the biggest scams out there.
and
It is also a good thing

I know a man who had a bike accident and he broke his back.

The insurance helped him big time and I mean big time.

So for his example without it he would be screwed,

But of all the thousands of people I know he is the only one who actually benefited from insurance

Over here in the UK we have a big scandal going on ,its been going on for years.
PPI Payment protection Insurance.

People where being pushed into it and a large amount of people were paying for it even when they did no want it or because they were getting ripped off

Banks are know getting sued ,millions of customers are claiming hundreds and some thousands of pounds back.

So insurance most insurances are a scam
Those 5 year warranty deals are a rip off.
But car insurance is a must.
life insurance is only good if you die :headscratch:

Health insurance is ok.
But over here we dont really need it we pay NI a percentage of income towards The NHSS National health department.

Insurance is a scam but some of it is very important, and not to be over looked.

But it is controlled by the banking cartels and that I dont like.

Insurance scams is as old as insurance
The Titanic was an insurance scam
As well as The twin towers.
It is used to protect the big moneys

Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:17 am » by **99socks**

noentry wrote:But it you own a home or a car by law you must have insurance.

Only if you have a mortgage.. and no one requires that.

Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:22 am » by **Mrmcnuggets**

Coming from someone that went through a house fire, insurance companies certainly have their practical limits.

Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:35 am » by **Noentry**

99socks wrote:
noentry wrote:But it you own a home or a car by law you must have insurance.

Only if you have a mortgage.. and no one requires that.

Off course but how many people dont have a mortgage.
Most home owners have a mortgage. So must have Insurance and then there are countless insurances you can take out

only about 30% of the homes in the UK are owned out right the rest are mortgage and for those it is law to have insurance.
And lets not forget if you own a home and are lucky enough to pay it out right, it may not be law , but it is still advised to have insurance ,
The fear mongering starts , what if your house is broken into.
Damaged etc etc.
A hundred different reasons are given to push insurance on you.

If you dont drive and you rent then you can be insurance free.
But who wants that not me.
I want my car and I want to own my home.
So I have to have certain insurance and I have to, I have no choice.

Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:58 am » by **Ishumble**

organized crime against the citizens mostly there are a few good insurance comps
here is one scam example

Upload to Disclose.tv

Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:02 am » by **Mydogma**

mrmcnuggets wrote:Coming from someone that went through a house fire, insurance companies certainly have their practical limits.

Yep I don't have a problem with the concept, I hve a problem with the fact that a mandated product is on the stock market and has to first and formost protect its shareholders and their profits, saskatewan has had gov auto insurance for years..(And I think they still do). Anything that is mandated should be provided for by gov...if all hell broke loose those insurance companies can say..whoops bankrupt and gov(taxpayer) is on tHe hook anyway..ontario has tried for years but the insurance lobbiests always win...insurance should be only about the people not the profit...