Introduction to "no real 9/11 imagery" theory

[Hoipolloi Profile]

Hi.

If you have been following WikiLeaks and CIA videos recently, you may be curious why there is so much suspicion around the characters behind the WikiLeaks instant inflate-a-story.

I hope that you might be interested in the complicity of the news media on 9/11 and the research that has been done to advance our understanding of the simulation aspects of 9/11 - such as simulate victims ("vicsims"), simulated running crowd scenes and grayboxing a sim-manhattan thanks to a team of sloppy animators and programmers.

Here is a short introduction to these concepts - and the amazing idea that no *real* video of 9/11 - in any of the amateur sources - is of any value because they have all been counterfeited (i.e.; computer animated from scratch).

Thank you. In Simon Shack's words:

We believe that Media Fakery is the most urgent issue to tackle in order to restore sanity on this planet. Media Fakery is the weapon of mass distraction used by a network of nutty power brokers (I like to call it "The Nutwork") to fool the world to their advantage. It has worked out nicely for centuries, for such is the essence of human nature that, when squarely duped, a man's ego will prefer to ignore the fact rather than admitting it. The Nutwork and their subservient media conglomerates have long been well aware of this inherent weakness of mankind; their news-hoaxing tricks are routinely employed to generate incalculable profits and public consensus for waging murderous, barbaric wars of aggression. But their insane obsession for mass mind-control is now turning against them. Their wretched deception ploys are now exploding in their faces - one by one.

the 9/11 terror-simulation exposed
The research: http://www.septemberclues.info
The forum: http://www.cluesforum.info

It is fair to say the September Clues research has established these 4 main points:

1- The 9/11 imagery was nothing but a Hollywood-style film production, complete with actors in the role of 'eye-witnesses' or 'firefighters', staged 'running crowds', 3D-compositing and special cinematic effects. The '9/11 movie' was split into a number of short clips and sold to the TV audience as 'newscasts'. The few clips featuring 'airplanes' (or dull silhouettes thereof) were computer-generated images - clearly in conflict with each other. Years of relentless 'debunking' attempts have failed to disprove the evidence expounded in the longstanding September Clues research.

2- No commercial airliners were hijacked or - much less - crashed into the WTC towers, the Pentagon or the Shanksville field. No valid/verifiable records exist for : their airport logs/schedules, their numbered parts, their alleged passengers. Their reported speeds at near sea-level as well as the visuals of their total disappearance into the WTC defy the laws of mechanics and physics - and the absence of visible wake vortexes in the WTC impact imagery also defies the laws of aerodynamics.

3- The World Trade Center Complex (9 buildings in all) were demolished with powerful explosives. No image-analyses of the tower collapses can help determine just what type of explosives were employed - since the videos are 3D animations and do not represent the real-life events. In reality, as they collapsed, the WTC complex was most likely enveloped by military-grade smoke obscurants. No real/private imagery exists of the morning's events - 'thanks' to electromagnetic countermeasures.

4- No "3000" people were trapped in the top floors/nor perished in the WTC towers. Only one thing was more important to the perps than avoiding a mass murder of 3000 US citizens : to sell the notion that "bogeyman Bin Laden" killed 3000 US citizens. We have renamed the 'victims' of these psy-operations "VICSIMS" (SIMulated VICtims). In fact, our research has seen the same pattern emerge in all the so-called "Al-Quaeda Terror Attacks" around the world (LONDON 7/7, MADRID 11, BALI, MUMBAI, etc...). In all logic, the last aggravation the authorities behind these false-flag operations wished to have, were scores of real families hounding them forever with real questions. Hence: NO real terror victims = Logical operational rationale.

9/11 is but a giant - and still ongoing - money-making scam. It rotates around the most well-funded and profitable hoax of modern history. Everyone involved in the scheme is reaping a sizeable return from their 'investment bond' which, naturally, has "SILENCE" printed all over it. For anyone to 'speak out' would be both ruinous and suicidal - a most distasteful option. To be sure, 'suicidal heroics' only exist in journalistic fairy-tales such as the outlandish newsmedia's narrative of 9/11 and its "nineteen religious fanatics". The skeptics objecting that "too many people would have had to be in on this" fail to account for the most fundamental aspect of human nature: our survival instinct.

The master plan of 9/11 was to demolish the redundant, asbestos-filled WTC complex in Lower Manhattan - 9 buildings in all. The area would naturally be evacuated (as for all such demolitions) in order to prevent a slaughterhouse of dreadful proportions -not a good idea at all. To be sure, this was no mass murder scheme - just a formidable opportunity for massive financial gains and military propaganda. The military (and its various intelligence affiliates) would manage the ground logistics, such as securing the area, raising smokescreens to hide the proceedings from public view, and last but not least, electromagnetic countermeasures to keep any private cameras from filming the mayhem. The WTC complex was thus 'safely' destroyed in bright daylight.

The rest was (and still is to this day) a gigantic simulation staged and upheld by the complicit news media propaganda machine. The major news corporations are headed by a handful of moguls who are, contrary to popular belief, wholly subservient to the executive powers of USA, Great Britain, Europe and indeed, most of the world's governments. This unfortunate, yet widespread public belief (that the media checks and 'polices' our politicians) is being currently exploited to its full potential for the profit of a restrict so-called 'elite'. In his time, George Orwell would have called their structure "the Network". I suggest to call what we have today "the Nutwork" - since their inconsiderate behavior betray tell-tale signs of rampant megalomania and an alarming absence of mental balance.


THE SEPTEMBER CLUES WEBSITE http://www.septemberclues.info

The SC website gathers in one place the bulk of our research. On the 'welcome page' you will be able to watch the full 90-minute September Clues documentary with only two mouse clicks (two 45-minute halves). Click "ENTER SITE" to reach all the site's articles listed on the righthand sidebar. I will now list a number of FAQs and the relevant articles which address them. Feel free to repost this "tour guide" anywhere you like.

*******
Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the source-material of September Clues?
What did the 5 US TV networks broadcast on the morning of 9/11?
http://www.septemberclues.info/faq_1.htm
(Please watch "SYNCHED OUT"- the first 11minutes of the 9/11 broadcasts)

2. What about the many amateur videos we have seen?
http://www.septemberclues.info/faq_2.htm

3. What about the 4 flights we have heard about - and their passengers?
http://www.septemberclues.info/faq_3.htm

4. What about all the eye-witnesses we have heard of on the news?
http://www.septemberclues.info/faq_4.htm

5. Where can I verify the September Clues claim that all the 9/11 imagery was fake?
http://www.septemberclues.info/imagery_analyses.htm
(Think of the 9/11 imagery as a fully pre-fabricated "Hollywood" production)

6. How did they prevent New Yorkers from capturing real images of the events?
http://www.septemberclues.info/visual_control.htm

7. Where can I verify the claim that the 9/11 victims were (most or all) fictitious identities?
http://www.septemberclues.info/vicsims_ ... alyses.htm

8. What about the people we saw jumping out of the WTC towers?
http://www.septemberclues.info/jumpers.htm

9. Where can I find the full 80-page pdf file of the "VICSIM REPORT" ?
http://www.septemberclues.info/vicsims.htm

10. What would be the purpose of fabricating victims for an alleged terror attack ?
http://www.septemberclues.info/deconstructing.htm

11. Who are the people claiming to have lost a family member on 9/11?
http://tinyurl.com/911actors

12. What about the many other 9/11 truth organizations?
http://www.septemberclues.info/obstacles.htm

******

At this time, we are looking for human quality - not numbers - because we believe there is intelligent life on this planet - although it is a rare resource which needs to expand. At this advanced stage of our research, we will not tolerate mere cheerleaders, time-wasters or chit-chatters. As for professional government agents typing from their little cubicles, we strongly advise you to leave us alone; get a life - and a honest job. Your masters are busted - and you know it. Don't waste your life supporting their insane war games. To legitimate readers wary of the thoroughly fake "9/11 truth" movement, please reserve gut reaction and knee-jerk reactions to this post. Please, instead, watch the September Clues movie on the site or on my channel, do your own research to verify or find fault with any of the points and then consider posting a response.

If you are interested in a forum that posts from this perspective already in mind, please consider looking at www.cluesforum.info

Thank you.
Simon and Hoi

[Epicfailure Profile]

HAHAHA this shit again, take your stupid post somewhere else....

alot of amateur mistakes coming from you KILLTOWN and SIMON SHACK, you aren't fooling anyone I know who you are and your website sucks and is full of AMATEUR mistakes in photographic forensics..

you haven't even heard of camera lense filters, but yet you want to dissect the theory that there was no planes based on that fact...

ever heard of a wide angle lense? yeah they aren't duplicated shots they are different lenses used for different formats of television....they are also called COMPRESSION videos, from uploading, downloading, converting and reverting of video, the lack of detail is due to compressions...

get a September CLUE and learn about camera's you joke of a theorist.

[Liveecarbme Profile]

Hate to sound like a buzzkill, but you're preaching to the choir...
Good stuff though-stick around you'll find a wealth of theories, contradictory facts, astonishing data that was never included in the September 11th Commission, witness testimony that was ignored, altered, truncated and omitted as well. Sadly September 11th, 2001 is the Dealy Plaza of our generation...it often illicits a very emotional response and fosters a very narrow perspective of the facts...no matter how thoroughly vetted.
The events on that morning have forever changed the way this country operates and relates to itself, the world and has forever shaped its foreign policy-for the worse I fear. your observations and theories are no more wild or unlikely than any other to include that several towel-heads(sorry) using boxcutters overcame planeloads of ardent Americans causing a mass murder...all masterminded by a dying billionaire with renal failure in need of dialysis...blah blah blah.
Overtime you'll find a lot of disinfoers and flamers on this site-take it in stride & remember:
Fiat justitia, ruat caelum

There are plenty of sites that explore these important issues, omissions, deletions, contradictions and anomalies in the official version of the event on September 11, 2001.
For starters: http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org

[Epicfailure Profile]

I especially like this title on your forum that you advertised in the post here:

Reality Shack (Archive 2009-2010)
Archive of the original InvisionFree forum that stood strong from October 2009 to October 2010. We closed it permanently when InvisionFree began removing topics without consulting us - while shill activity became all too disruptive. So yes, THE MOST OBVIOUS POSTS INTENDED TO SABOTAGE OUR RESEARCH are being weeded out to keep this research database readable for future historians.

so basically I am guessing a bunch of people like me came in their and said you are crazy and showed evidence to the contrary that made to much sense, so you decided to pull everyone out and re-edit your post in the favor of your hideously disfigured theory....?

anywhere in the ballpark here~!?

why don't you engage people in this forum and discuss your theories here where it will be uncensored? could you do that? that way we are all guaranteed the best of what you have and the best of what we have won't and I quote "be changed or disappear from the shills"...

so how about it?