Is Henry Kissinger the future Antichrist 666 ? new evidence

[Closed1 Profile Website]

Is Henry Kissinger the future Antichrist 666. Based on the article excerpts below and these videos I think he once again should be considered quite seriously. Especially because Obama is following his orders and policy on the middle east.

Upload to Disclose.tv

Upload to Disclose.tv

The Atlantic Home

Obama's Inner Kissinger

By Mickey Edwards

Oct 23 2009, 4:38 PM ET

Jimmy Carter pushed for greater international respect for human rights. Even George W. Bush, who was inexplicably cavalier toward civil liberties in the United States, insisted on expanding human rights and democracy in the rest of the world, though perhaps too willing to impose, rather than promote.

And so now Barack Obama occupies the place of primacy in deciding the shape of America's international engagement. In a world full of danger, present or emerging, whose form has this new President taken? Henry Kissinger's.

This is a bit of a surprise. One element of Obama's electoral appeal was the clear sense that this was a man of high ideals. There is no question that those ideals existed, and strongly, and that they guided his approach to many of the nation's most vexing problems. If he had not exactly repeated Robert Kennedy's "I dream of things that never were and say, 'why not'", he had at least given a sense of commitment to the better angels.

The thing about the presidency, though, is that one invariably finds issues more complicated than they might have appeared from the campaign trail. Here, while one's heart may echo Jefferson, one's responsibilities make Washington's sense of caution more appealing. Henry Kissinger, Richard Nixon's Secretary of State, is known as the most prominent modern proponent of a "realpolitik" approach toward foreign policy in which, in the end, the most important factor in deciding a national approach to other nations is quite simple: "What is in America's interest"?

That alone is a difficult question. It was once thought to be in America's "interest" to ally itself with some of the worst dictators on the planet: we not only allied ourselves with, but embraced, the Batistas, the Somozas, the Shahs, the Noriegas, and while those short-term alliances may have been of some use in dealing with Soviet expansionism (a real threat at the time), we have clearly paid a long-term price for such narrowness of purpose. But the world is not easy. One wishes for more democracy, more freedom, more protection from abuse in all the places where these rights are in short supply. But there are other considerations and they necessarily impinge on the decisionmaking process. In that intra-cranial showdown, it now appears that it is the "hard" side, the perceived necessity of setting aside one's empathies, that has captured Barack Obama's thinking.

Obama's "Kissinger" revealed itself first when his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton went to China and declared that bringing up the unpleasantness of Chinese human rights violations would serve no useful purpose and detract from the importance of finding common ground with Beijing on various international concerns ranging from trade to climate change to North Korean nuclear weaponry (this from a woman who once went to China to protest its discriminatory policies toward women).

Our hearts may have wanted to protest the suppression of freedoms, say a word for Tibet, complain about the treatment of Uighurs, but the Administration decided it needed China for other things of more immediate concern to us. That has since been followed by a retreat from our previous confrontational approach toward Sudan where Obama now envisions a more positive policy of engagement with a government whose president has been indicted by the International Criminal Court for atrocities in Darfur.

There is no bottom-line conclusion here: in a presidency that is so young, one cannot know whether the soft line taken toward China, Sudan, Russia, and other violators of human liberties will in the end dominate Mr. Obama's foreign policy decisions. But neither can the early signs be ignored. For the moment, it appears, Henry Kissinger is back.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... er/28998/#

Netanyahu asks Kissinger for advice on 'historic peace'

By JPOST.COM STAFF
11/11/2010 09:32

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu met with former American secretary of state Henry Kissinger on Wednesday night.

"You helped to advance agreements that led to the historic peace with Egypt. It is likely that you have good advice on how to advance a similar goal today," Netanyahu said.

He added that he plans to discuss with US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton "ways to achieve a peace agreement based on a broad understanding with the Palestinian people and perhaps with additional Arab states as well, an agreement based on security, which will give clear answers to Israel's security needs. We have broad understandings with the US on this issue, as on many others; they overcome the disagreements on other topics."

http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=194842