Is Ron Paul Changing His Story About Those Newsletters?
GOP candidate Ron Paul is again under fire for incendiary racial statements mailed out under his name in the late 1980s and 1990s, though a past interview appears to be at odds with the Texas congressman’s most recent declaration that he knew nothing about the inflammatory comments at the time.
On Wednesday, the Texas congressman walked out of a CNN interview after correspondent Gloria Borger asked him about the content of the newsletters, which were called “Ron Paul’s Political Report,“ ”Ron Paul’s Freedom Report,“ the ”Ron Paul Survival Report“ and the ”Ron Paul Investment Letter.” When the issue was raised in 2008, Paul said he didn’t write everything that appeared in the newsletters, though they bore his name.
Among some of the writings were statements that said, “Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal“ and ”If you’ve ever been robbed by a black teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet of foot they can be.”
Paul denied Wednesday having written the statements, and said he didn’t know about them at the time.
“It’s 22 years ago. I didn‘t write ’em, I disavow ‘em, that’s it,” he told CNN. “I never read that stuff, I was probably aware of it 10 years after it was written.”
But those statements appear to be at odds with comments Paul made to the Dallas Morning News in 1996, http://www.criticalreactor.com/ronpaul/newsletters/1996_Dallas_Morning_News.html, when he was running for Congress and defended the writings, saying they were taken out of context.
“These aren’t my figures,” Paul said of the statement that 95 percent of the black males in D.C. are criminals. “That is the assumption you can gather” from a 1992 study from a criminal justice think tank.
He similarly did not refute the “fleet of foot” statement, which also appeared in 1992.
“If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them,” he told the newspaper.
And in a 1995 interview with C-SPAN, unearthed by Andrew Kaczynski, Paul discussed his 10-year hiatus from Congress and what he had been doing in the private sector, among them putting together “a political type of business investment newsletter” — touting it three years after those statements appeared.
“It covered a lot about what was going on in Washington, and financial events, and especially some of the monetary events,” Paul said. “Since I had been especially interested in monetary policy, had been on the banking committee, and still very interested in, in that subject, that this newsletter dealt with it.”
Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey observed, “For a man who now says that he didn’t pay any attention to the newsletters published under his own name for years, he certainly seems to be pretty conversant with its contents in 1995.”
On Wednesday, the Texas congressman walked out of a CNN interview after correspondent Gloria Borger asked him about the content of the newsletters, which were called “Ron Paul’s Political Report,“ ”Ron Paul’s Freedom Report,“ the ”Ron Paul Survival Report“ and the ”Ron Paul Investment Letter.” When the issue was raised in 2008, Paul said he didn’t write everything that appeared in the newsletters, though they bore his name.
Among some of the writings were statements that said, “Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal“ and ”If you’ve ever been robbed by a black teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet of foot they can be.”
Paul denied Wednesday having written the statements, and said he didn’t know about them at the time.
“It’s 22 years ago. I didn‘t write ’em, I disavow ‘em, that’s it,” he told CNN. “I never read that stuff, I was probably aware of it 10 years after it was written.”
But those statements appear to be at odds with comments Paul made to the Dallas Morning News in 1996, http://www.criticalreactor.com/ronpaul/newsletters/1996_Dallas_Morning_News.html, when he was running for Congress and defended the writings, saying they were taken out of context.
“These aren’t my figures,” Paul said of the statement that 95 percent of the black males in D.C. are criminals. “That is the assumption you can gather” from a 1992 study from a criminal justice think tank.
He similarly did not refute the “fleet of foot” statement, which also appeared in 1992.
“If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them,” he told the newspaper.
And in a 1995 interview with C-SPAN, unearthed by Andrew Kaczynski, Paul discussed his 10-year hiatus from Congress and what he had been doing in the private sector, among them putting together “a political type of business investment newsletter” — touting it three years after those statements appeared.
“It covered a lot about what was going on in Washington, and financial events, and especially some of the monetary events,” Paul said. “Since I had been especially interested in monetary policy, had been on the banking committee, and still very interested in, in that subject, that this newsletter dealt with it.”
Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey observed, “For a man who now says that he didn’t pay any attention to the newsletters published under his own name for years, he certainly seems to be pretty conversant with its contents in 1995.”
Now to be fair. I don't give a flip what someone said over 20 years ago IF they have changed their mind of grown past it. 22 years is a long time and a persons viewpoints will drastically change probably multiple times as they get older and experience life.
What once again concerns me is his apparent dishonesty now.
What once again concerns me is his apparent dishonesty now.
rydher wrote:Now to be fair. I don't give a flip what someone said over 20 years ago IF they have changed their mind of grown past it. 22 years is a long time and a persons viewpoints will drastically change probably multiple times as they get older and experience life.
What once again concerns me is his apparent dishonesty now.
You are concerned about honesty of one politicians or most politicians?
Politicians put The capital D into Dishonesty

I am aware it's often a thankless task persuading someone on a forum that they are mistaken. They are often, in the true sense of the word, bigots!
That's a shame you feel that way Noentry but not a surprise. People that are in line with your world view always dehumanize people. Politicians are people too and as people are capable of running the gamut from dirt bags to good guys, just as anyone else.
.rydher wrote:That's a shame you feel that way Noentry but not a surprise. People that are in line with your world view always dehumanize people. Politicians are people too and as people are capable of running the gamut from dirt bags to good guys, just as anyone else.
my views on politicians is based on observation
And the few I know told me, to be in politics, you must say yes to everybody and do the least you can .
Personal experience from the horses mouth.
But maybe you know an honest one .
That would be refreshing to hear.
Not all are corrupt. Agreed
But havent you ever heard the saying absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Here in England last year we had a massive scandal about politicians abusing the funding system of parliament.
Most were caught with their hand in the pot and most are corrupt.
I am aware it's often a thankless task persuading someone on a forum that they are mistaken. They are often, in the true sense of the word, bigots!
rydher wrote:There are good people in this world, yes even politicians and lawyers. No one is perfect but there are people that do their best to do the right thing. Don't be so jaded.
Well said.
That is why after all the crap I hear about Ron Paul and my beliefs on politicians .
If I could I would still vote for him.
I am aware it's often a thankless task persuading someone on a forum that they are mistaken. They are often, in the true sense of the word, bigots!
- Trigerhipy

- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:32 am
quit being stupid,Ron Paul is one of the very few honest politicians there are. The bullshit story that he defended those comments was from some interview 16 years ago.Ron Paul will try to save our country from the bankers and corporations,to help all citizens,especially the poor and middle class, who come in all colors. I already know theres hardly a single black person wholl vote for him over Obama tho,and he calls himself a republican also,and anybody whos not a millionaire shouldnt vote for any GOP candidate.If you knew Ron Paul,youd know hes the exception,thats why the media and GOP is trying to crush him. Get out and vote for him in the primary,or your screwed again,its that simple.
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Changing the History
by freeyourmindnow » Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:05 pm - 1 Replies
- 152 Views
- Last post by freeyourmindnow

Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:31 pm
- Changing the History
-
- VIDEO: Ron Paul 2012: Why the media ignores Ron Paul
1, 2by tragedyandhopes » Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:08 am - 11 Replies
- 630 Views
- Last post by pavmas

Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:20 pm
- VIDEO: Ron Paul 2012: Why the media ignores Ron Paul
-
- My opinion of Obama is changing!
1 ... 8, 9, 10by wrathofkahn » Fri Aug 07, 2009 7:50 pm - 99 Replies
- 1372 Views
- Last post by spock

Fri Oct 02, 2009 2:22 am
- My opinion of Obama is changing!
-
- This face changing thing on tv
by neilglfc » Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:16 pm - 0 Replies
- 155 Views
- Last post by neilglfc

Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:16 pm
- This face changing thing on tv
-
- Real time face changing
by toxic32 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:04 pm - 0 Replies
- 200 Views
- Last post by toxic32

Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:04 pm
- Real time face changing



