Is Russia Serious About Threats To U.S. Space Cooperation?

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10228
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostThu May 15, 2014 6:10 am » by *WillEase*


Published on May 14, 2014

A top Russian official says a U.S. request to keep hitching rides to the International Space Station through 2024 will be denied.


Upload to Disclose.tv

The site owner Lukas said I could show you how to makes hundreds of dollars in your spare time like I do.
If you would like to get yours too, PM me and I WILL hook you up.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 6:08 am
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

PostThu May 15, 2014 5:26 pm » by mistermassive1


Image Story Here: http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/13/us/ru ... ion-plans/

No surprise really, I mean what would you do with all the BS they are dealing with right now?

ImageThey are panning on closing it down as well in the near future: http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... n-in-2020/

It has to be one expense the Russia now feels is worthless with the global elite focused on resource control and economic takeover. They will now focus on the same and consolidate their finances accordingly.
http://www.therealconspiracyforum.com/

Master Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 10228
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

PostThu May 15, 2014 6:48 pm » by *WillEase*


mistermassive1 wrote: Story Here: http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/13/us/ru ... ion-plans/

No surprise really, I mean what would you do with all the BS they are dealing with right now?

They are panning on closing it down as well in the near future: http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... n-in-2020/

It has to be one expense the Russia now feels is worthless with the global elite focused on resource control and economic takeover. They will now focus on the same and consolidate their finances accordingly.


The Russians have vested interests in the ISS so it's not as though they are scrapping their space program due to sanctions. They are parting ways with American cooperation which, in my opinion would not benefit either space programs.
This, no doubt will expatiate the private sector programs such as SpaceX. I never liked the idea of depending on the Russians to get our astronauts to and from the station to begin with, so the news is neither a surprise or concern.
The site owner Lukas said I could show you how to makes hundreds of dollars in your spare time like I do.
If you would like to get yours too, PM me and I WILL hook you up.

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 1:59 pm
Location: Under a Chemtrailed Sky

PostThu May 15, 2014 6:53 pm » by DarkHeart


I bet they flog it off to some twat like Richard Branson to run as some kind of space hotel for overpaid stockbrokers to take coke & flashy hookers on.


:yell:
Canubis wrote:i recently made some retarded threads and had boon swinging from my nuts

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 18935
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: underneath the circumstances

PostThu May 15, 2014 7:00 pm » by The57ironman


.


....so, there aren't trillion$ being spent in black projects..

..and all this NASA sh*t is all on the up and up..?


bs

:mrcool:

.
...you know it's autumn in New England
....when you have to run your air conditioning and heat...
in the same day..
Image

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 6:08 am
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

PostThu May 15, 2014 7:11 pm » by mistermassive1


The57ironman wrote:.


....so, there aren't trillion$ being spent in black projects..

..and all this NASA sh*t is all on the up and up..?


bs

:mrcool:

.

Image
My thoughts exactly. There is too much out there that lends credence to the idea that there is a secret space program and more that is unknown to the public at large. Many theorists also put forward the idea that the only reason Russia had a fall of communism was due to the global trade and digital technology they sorely needed to develop.
Image
I don't think Russia has anything like the US secret space program but one can ponder the idea. I do think that NASA is a science project to put a face on wasteful spending and a means to justify certain discoveries having to do with space phenomena and academic studies.

The only thing that I often contemplate is whether the science is in the hand of the government or in private hands. After all, a great deal of the research and study is handled by private contractors under budgets from the government. If my company developed something that had little oversight it would be easy to hold out for a higher bidder or work towards a specific goal (private hidden agenda) that would be unknown to the financiers (the gubbment).

Who knows...

Image
http://www.therealconspiracyforum.com/

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 6:08 am
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

PostMon May 19, 2014 12:07 am » by mistermassive1


http://www.therealconspiracyforum.com/

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:47 pm

PostMon May 19, 2014 12:33 am » by pushtone


RD-180


RD Amross was "very close to producing a U.S.-built version of the RD-180, and with some infusion of NASA funding could be manufacturing that engine (and perhaps even a 1,700,000 lbf or 7.6 MN thrust equivalent of the RD-170) in a few years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RD-180



Image
- - -

"If we take eternity to mean not infinite temporal duration but timelessness, then eternal life belongs to those who live in the present.

Ludwig Wittgenstein.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 6:08 am
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

PostMon May 19, 2014 2:58 am » by mistermassive1


RD Amross was "very close to producing a U.S.-built version of the RD-180, and with some infusion of NASA funding could be manufacturing that engine (and perhaps even a 1,700,000 lbf or 7.6 MN thrust equivalent of the RD-170) in a few years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RD-180

Read more: is-russia-serious-about-threats-to-u-s-space-cooperation-t93881.html#ixzz327RicEK4


Orbital is looking for a long-term replacement for the AJ-26 engines used in its Antares rocket and has its eye on Atlas 5’s core-stage engine, the RD-180. However, RD-Amross, under a longstanding exclusivity agreement, only sells the engine to ULA, the Lockheed Martin-Boeing joint venture that provides most major U.S. government launches. Orbital, in a lawsuit filed with the U.S. District Court for Eastern Virginia in Alexandria, said the arrangement should be struck down because it gives a ULA monopoly for “launch systems and services used for medium-class payload missions.” Orbital is seeking $500 million to $1.5 billion in damages. The Dulles, Va.-based rocket and satellite builder has also asked the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to strike down the RD-180 exclusivity agreement.

They made the news not long ago: http://www.spacenews.com/article/launch ... xclusivity
http://www.therealconspiracyforum.com/

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 6:08 am
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

PostMon May 19, 2014 7:01 pm » by mistermassive1


Update on the RD 180 Engines:



Upload to Disclose.tv

http://www.therealconspiracyforum.com/



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook