Israel PM in Rome to Stop Palestine State

Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:30 am » by **Freeyourmindnow**

pay attention to handshake :look:

it is masonic

Rome's Mayor Gianni Alemanno (R) shakes hands with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's (C) wife Sara (L).

'Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is due to meet Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi in a bid to convince Italy to oppose a Palestinian statehood.

Netanyahu and nine Israeli ministers arrived in Italy on Sunday for two days of joint meetings, AFP reported. The talks between Netanyahu and Berlusconi are to include the recent changes and revolutions in the Middle East.

The main reason of the visit, however, is to persuade Italy to oppose a Palestinian statehood as the new Palestinian unity government is expected to apply for the United Nations recognition and membership in September.'

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/184430.html

Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:35 pm » by **Theoracle**

nice post freeyourmindnow .
the nation who looks to others to validate its claims is a nation in turmoil or in fear

peace and love theoracle

Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:45 pm » by **Jimmyduek**

im in israel, i live here and i dont oppose to a palestinian state, even if it is with the 1967 parts... 1 capital for 2 states... i want their state...
that bibi is just another idiot who just care about the money and money... im a jew too and i dont follow him, so please dont blame israel of what is happening blame the people who's in power.. im trying with my circle of people to make it happend but im not in the news or in the newspapers. i just can blog.. and defend what i believe, and i believe that you are just looking one part of the story, you dont live here to see how is it
so american people, return your conquered territories to mexico, engalnd, return the Malvinas to argentina... how does it feel, you dont want it right your going to tell me "oo no its our land" well here is my land, and in more than one occasion we gave territories, so.....
STOP FUCKING WITH US

Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:56 pm » by **abdullha14**

the recent announcement of an unity agreement between Fatah and Hamas raises profound and legitimate questions for Israel — how can israel negotiate with a party that has shown itself unwilling to recognize israel's right to exist?

Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:26 pm » by **Ironlikealion**

'Palestinians expressing second thoughts over UN path'

Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas wants to "climb down from the tree" and restart talks with Israel, but can't due to widespread pressure, the Associated Press reported Thursday.

According to PA sources several senior PA officials are advising Abbas to forgo plans to seek a unilateral declaration of PA statehood at the UN in September due to opposition to the move from the United States.

However, the sources say the sense is that having announced his intentions to pursue the unilateral UN path, Abbas has "left himself with little room to maneuver and may proceed with the UN gambit simply to avoid a loss of credibility."

"We are trapped with September," one official told the AP. "We don't know what to do after that."

The PA officials, who spoke to AP on condition of anonymity, said several top PA advisers were having second thoughts about the unilateralist track at the UN.
Among them are PLO second-in-command Yasser Abed Rabbo, PA chief negotiator Saeb Erekat; and former PA representative to the UN Nasser Al-Qidwa.

Qidwa noted the limits of Abbas's unilateral UN track earlier this week, saying the PA should still rally behind statehood efforts at the UN, "but we should distinguish between getting support and getting recognition."

"We cannot get recognition simply because the US will veto it," the AP quoted Qidwa as saying.

Qidwa's comments suggest a growing realization that the unilateral UN track is problematic and promises an unclear conclusion that may not only change nothing, but may backfire and trigger a new wave of violence PA leaders cannot control.

Abbas attempt to step down from his self-created political precipice may be due to serious discussion in the US congress over cutting funding to the PA, which comes as the PA finds itself amidst another budget crisis. Abbas had previously said he would pursue the unilateral track irrespective of US objections - and even if US funds were cut.

Earlier this week, senior Israeli and PA negotiators traveled to Washington and held separate meetings with US officials to explore the possibility of restarting negotiations.

http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPoliti ... ?id=224393
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/144845

Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:13 pm » by **Theoracle**

jimmyduek wrote:im in israel, i live here and i dont oppose to a palestinian state, even if it is with the 1967 parts... 1 capital for 2 states... i want their state...
that bibi is just another idiot who just care about the money and money... im a jew too and i dont follow him, so please dont blame israel of what is happening blame the people who's in power.. im trying with my circle of people to make it happend but im not in the news or in the newspapers. i just can blog.. and defend what i believe, and i believe that you are just looking one part of the story, you dont live here to see how is it
so american people, return your conquered territories to mexico, engalnd, return the Malvinas to argentina... how does it feel, you dont want it right your going to tell me "oo no its our land" well here is my land, and in more than one occasion we gave territories, so.....
STOP FUCKING WITH US

you are a good man and honest I like you, well said :flop:

peace and love theoracle

Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:12 pm » by **abdullha14**

your about as honset as a lizard that keeps changing colors theoracle :alien51:

67 ?
the settlements. Are they the reason for the conflict? If so, surely removing all of them would solve the conflict. That is the flawed logic of Israel bashers

The first settlement was established after 1967; however, the conflict started long before,.

The Palestinians refuse to recognize Israel right to exist , 67 or not 67 for tham 67 is just a better head start for the next extermination war

Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:17 pm » by **Theoracle**

abdullha14 wrote:your about as honset as a lizard that keeps changing colors theoracle
67 ?
the settlements. Are they the reason for the conflict? If so, surely removing all of them would solve the conflict. That is the flawed logic of Israel bashers

The first settlement was established after 1967; however, the conflict started long before,.

The Palestinians refuse to recognize Israel right to exist , 67 or not 67 for tham 67 is just a better head start for the next extermination war

this is from the man who has a musslim name says he is pro palestinian and puts out anti arab sentimenr :lol:

peace and love theoracle

Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:38 pm » by **abdullha14**

dont let the name confuse you my friend now answer me about the 67 thing
why they insist israel go back to 67 ?
there were no settlement in 67 and they started a war against israel anyway so why should israel go back to 67 when they openly admit they want the whole thing and not just 67

Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:48 pm » by **Theoracle**

abdullha14 wrote:dont let the name confuse you my friend now answer me about the 67 thing
why they insist israel go back to 67 ?
there were no settlement in 67 and they started a war against israel anyway so why should israel go back to 67 when they openly admit they want the whole thing and not just 67

please you got me wrong I dont care how its done as long as people stop killing each other .
The Jewish people have as much right to land as the palestinians I want innocent women and chilren to stop living in fear .
what ever it takes to stop the killing .
that means concession on both sides, no peace if you can not find a common ground
As the common man only wants peace

peace and love theoracle