IT’S NOT AN EASY THING TO ACCEPT

Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:36 pm » by **Basecampchris**

No, I started with a question. JC complex or nail pulling. Torture and death are strong words that you have still not justified using. So no, no ridicule just a question.

My worth? Is it not you who claim we all have "worth" ??? Is that only if we agree with you?

This is what I am seeing, you cannot face a critique with any kind of style. You refer to my clients? My clients are not involved in this discussion and you have never met me or them yet you want to get personal rather than answer the questions posed??? Wow.

I read your writings carefully and again, I would say there is an air of the superior in them. So back to the question, how is the writer facing torture and death here?

Or is that beneath you to answer? Is it easier to target my company and clients? Have at it Sir, that to me just proves you only like adoration and loathe critical discussion of what you write. Basically we all have to say thank you earthspirit or you start spitting out the passifier.

Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:41 pm » by **Gonzo63**

basecampchris wrote:Read the entire article then went to the blog.

Conclusion. The writer is convinced he is a higher being. That we need him and that those who do not need him are brainwashed and blind.

Sound about right? Further, he is "wishy washy" claims of powers and glimpses coming to him through energy waves, but very lacking in anything of actual substance. No, sorry, largely unimpressed.

Thank you. Couldn't have said it better myself. Just another messiah wannabe cashing in on the New Age shit that is swirling in the toilet of 2012 imagined doom.

I get so tired of this crap.

Why

Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:19 pm » by **Cosmine**

WHAT IS SHAME?
Shame is to worry what's the devil's gonna think about oneself!

:cheers:

Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:33 pm » by **Samuelthemule**

cosmine wrote::flop:

WHAT IS SHAME?
Shame is to worry what's the devil's gonna think about oneself!

ooh, now that's a good one.

i was just thinking: this thread is a prime example how people would rather argue, than combine their efforts and find the common ground aka the truth between the two extremes.

we are all one, the ties that bind are invisible to some, but that's just because they haven't adjusted the inner eye.

the devil aka evil one? other one, is, i secret, your neighbour on a bad day, why be afraid of anything if we truly walk with god eh?

hah,

:cheers:

cheers guys

Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:34 pm » by **Welcomechange**

earthspirit7 - much love and blessin big man- i love your posts - keep up the good work :clapper:

Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:45 pm » by **Basecampchris**

I am lost. The inner eye? Hang on a moment, so if someone says "I have seen it with my inner eye" We just have to say "OK well then thats validated, he seen it with his inner eye so it must be the truth" ?????
And not say "Hang on a minute, your inner eye, mind if I have a look at it?" This David Wilcock seems to be all over the internet with a multitude of very pissed off people saying the same thing I am saying.

AGAIN... I ask "torture and death" ?????? validate that statement!
The guy is a new age band wagon driver with no idea where his band wagon is going or how he is steering it or if it has any wheels that work! All he cares about is being seen as some "inner eye expert" Question him or anyone else with the "inner eye" and they all start throwing the toys from the play pen and stamping feet.

This is my take. You simply CANNOT use verbage such as that and expect us all to say "thank you oh enlightened one" You all can, in fact have at it, me, I am looking at this guy with a way more critical eye. He knows less than nothing and is making the rest up as he goes along!!!

Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:51 pm » by **Samuelthemule**

welcomechange wrote:earthspirit7 - much love and blessin big man- i love your posts - keep up the good work

yeah man.

on your efforts earthspirit.

real or not, there are gems to extract for everyone.

RE; Jesus Christ "complex" or "suffering from torture/persecution", curiously enough, maybe both? having that as a complex would lead to that no?

:ohno:

ohnoez logicks!

by the way, the fact still seems to have escaped you that david wilcock and an-other author wrote the message earthspirit is posting, and not earthspirit himself, so your attacks are for the most part unwarranted.

also, emotional unloading aka "dumping" on someone is a shitty thing to do. especially when you admit you are not even looking over their content or truly scrutinizing it.

I really think your survivalism guides are worthwhile, and was amazed to see everything one can do with a tampon, but you know, i'm also amazed by what we can do with a few words, eh?

why be negative when you can be positive?

re: your last reply, so do you not see that the atoms that go into making up you are, in the long run, only seperated by a phantasmal gap, which is soon (in the scale of the time of the universe) to be eradicated?

as for the inner eye, it's really not all that esoteric.

your eyes feed back, through your pineal gland (third eye), to the back of your brain which generates and "decodes" and constructs visual images, for you to navigate. if you meditate, you can activate this by pulling your sense of perception, from just your 2 eyes, more in line with the centre, and gain additional sight/ intuition. research DMT and so on. it's in the realm of accepted science and holography now. the world is lost on those who see "with" and not -through- the eye. just like A world is lost on those who have no eyes to begin with, or no ears, or no sense of touch, taste, or smell?

let me ask you this question: Where exactly is the difference between a person with a totally underdeveloped sense, which could be developed, and someone who does not have that sense at all?

plato said the third eye or "eye by which one sees truth", is more valuable than a thousand hands or feet, as it alone grants one access to the visions which will lead one back "home". aka, the source, aka, that place we are all trying to go.

my suggestion is not "lap it up", i am critical of earthspirit in other posts and have let him know, my suggestion is: find a way to synthesize instead of polarizing further.

as for gurus, no real guru would say to you: you MUST bow to me because i've seen it, at random, they would say: see it for yourself! open your third eye, and find out!

:cheers:

Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:02 pm » by **Basecampchris**

I am not trying to pick on earth, if it comes across that way then I apologise. I guess the difference is that I have NOT yet read anything by him which is not just plain "vague"

As for Wilcock, I read about BECAUSE earth posted it, not because I think earth is Wilcock. My comments about Wilcock in no way reflect any issue I have with earth just that I think Wilcock is full of the brown smelly stuff.

As for a sixth sense I agree, in theory at least. Yes I do feel there are instances where living beings have extra censory perception but... I also feel too many people have taken this and perverted it for personal gain. So, my comments, the negative ones, are directed to these people.

Truth is all we all strive for. But, I for one am not about to agree with everything that is written and certainly nothing that I read in the opening post of this thread. I do not wish to attack or belittle earth, I just retain the right to be critical of much that he writes. This does not reflect on my view of him as a valuable and likable human being.