Jet in 'near miss' with UFO near Heathrow Airport

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 15836
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:12 pm

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 11:03 am » by Spock


Image

Jet in 'near miss' with UFO
An airline pilot reports a close encounter with a UFO near Heathrow Airport which has baffled the aviation authorities


It was certainly a close encounter, but with precisely what remains a mystery.

An airline pilot has reported a near miss in which a “rugby ball”-shaped UFO passed within a few feet of his passenger jet while flying near Heathrow Airport.

The captain told the aviation authorities who have investigated the incident that he was certain the object was going to crash into his aircraft and ducked as it headed towards him.

The investigation has been unable to establish any earthly identity for the mysterious craft, which left the aircrew with no time to take evasive action.

The incident occurred while the A320 Airbus was cruising at 34,000ft, around 20 miles west of the airport, over the Berkshire countryside.

The captain spotted the object travelling towards the jet out of a left hand side, cockpit window, apparently heading directly for it.

A report into the incident states: “He was under the apprehension that they were on collision course with no time to react. His immediate reaction was to duck to the right and reach over to alert the FO (First Officer); there was no time to talk to alert him.”

It adds: “The Captain was fully expecting to experience some kind of impact with a conflicting aircraft.”

He told investigators he believes the object passes “within a few feet” above the jet.

He described it as being “cigar/rugby ball like” in shape, bright silver and apparently “metallic” in construction.

Once he had composed himself, he checked the aircraft’s instruments and contacted air traffic controllers to report the incident. However, there was no sign of the mystery craft.

The incident was investigated by the UK Airprox Board, which studies “near misses” involving aircraft in British airspace.

It checked data recordings to establish what other aircraft were in the area at the time, but eliminated them all from its quest to find out what had been responsible. It also ruled out meteorological balloons, after checking none were released in the vicinity. Toy balloons were also discounted, as they are not large enough to reach such heights. Military radar operators were also contacted but were unable to trace the reported object.

The sighting occurred in daylight, at around. 6.35pm on July 13. It has only emerged now, following publication of the report, which concluded it was “not possible to trace the object or determine the likely cause of the sighting”.

The report does not name the airline or flight involved. Even though it describes the aircraft as being "just to the west of Heathrow", aviation experts believe that at such an altitude it would be unlikely to have taken off from, or be preparing to land at, the west London airport.

Instead, the A320, which is popular with many carriers, among them British Airways and Virgin, is likely to have been travelling between a regional airport elsewhere in the UK, and another on the Continent. The aircraft typically carry about 150 passengers.

The Ministry of Defence closed its UFO desk in December 2009, along with its hotline for reporting such sightings. Following that change, the Civil Aviation Authority took the decision that it would continue to look into such reports, from aircrew and air traffic controllers, because they could have implications for “flight safety”.

In 2012, the head of the National Air Traffic Control Services admitted staff detected around one unexplained flying object every month.

Dr David Clarke, a Sheffield Hallam academic and the UFO consultant for the National Archives, said: “The aviation authorities obviously think this is something they should continue to look into and if you are a regular air traveller, you are likely to agree.”

Dr Clarke, a sceptic on UFO issues, said: “This latest sighting is interesting, because it is detailed and clear. These pilots don’t file these reports for something and nothing. There was obviously something there.”

Chris Yates, an aviation consultant, said: “Although we assume when these things happen, a UFO is responsible, there is usually an explanation that materialises at some point.”


Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... h-UFO.html

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7683
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 7:14 am

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 4:10 pm » by 99socks



Chris Yates, an aviation consultant, said: “Although we assume when these things happen, a UFO is responsible, there is usually an explanation that materialises at some point.”



This is new: they first assume it's a UFO before discovering that usually it is not.

Anyways, what are the chances it was an attempted terrorist attack from something like a rocket launcher?
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 2:54 pm

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 4:46 pm » by Thruster


99socks wrote:

Chris Yates, an aviation consultant, said: “Although we assume when these things happen, a UFO is responsible, there is usually an explanation that materialises at some point.”




This is new: they first assume it's a UFO before discovering that usually it is not.

Anyways, what are the chances it was an attempted terrorist attack from something like a rocket launcher?



At 34,000 feet over Berkshire?


Image
Image

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 19573
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:22 pm
Location: In your grill

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 5:07 pm » by Slith


I read this on BBC.com yesterday. Interesting
Image

Canubis wrote:

u fell for my missle tow.....its just a pek..... im perma banned 3 times for fags.... so smooch! it

SMAK ME BITCH on the lips....

xmass is coming hard...

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 482
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:32 pm
Location: Nova Scotia

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 6:36 pm » by Buhdoo


Didn't the report mention something about kids and remote control toys/balloons? What a crock..

Think the pilot of a big ass plane would know the difference between a big metallic object and a balloon, jeez

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 18935
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:20 am
Location: underneath the circumstances

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 6:49 pm » by The57ironman


Buhdoo wrote:Didn't the report mention something about kids and remote control toys/balloons? What a crock..

Think the pilot of a big ass plane would know the difference between a big metallic object and a balloon, jeez




:cheers:
Image
...you know it's autumn in New England
....when you have to run your air conditioning and heat...
in the same day..
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7600
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:34 pm

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 7:20 pm » by Flecktarn


something most people might not be aware of is that almost all large civilian aircraft now carry iff markers to identify themselves to military aircraft
ImageImage

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7683
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 7:14 am

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 7:24 pm » by 99socks


Maybe it really was a rugby ball? :D

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16197529
Image

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 482
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:32 pm
Location: Nova Scotia

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 8:21 pm » by Buhdoo


99socks wrote:Maybe it really was a rugby ball? :D

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16197529


Well whoever threw/kicked that needs signing up to an American football team.. Oh and perhaps examined by a physics lab for his ability to make it change size and material.

:flop:

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7683
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 7:14 am

PostTue Jan 07, 2014 8:26 pm » by 99socks


Buhdoo wrote:
99socks wrote:Maybe it really was a rugby ball? :D

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16197529


Well whoever threw/kicked that needs signing up to an American football team.. Oh and perhaps examined by a physics lab for his ability to make it change size and material.

:flop:



:cheers:

:lol:
Image



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook