## Jorge Mario = 666/pope d francis = 666 /Bergoglios=666

Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:26 pm

You might like:

Look Zeta & Poooot, all I was doing was showing the error in Zanbag's post and explained what the numeric modes he was using, because he used Alphanumeric 6 in one & Alphanumeric 9 in another.I then gave a link to support it. I made no claims whatsoever, I never even mentioned numerology! All I said was the 'interesting' fact of the words 'internet' and 'computer' came up 666 in basis 6 & basis 6 reversed numerics .Numerics and Numerology are 2 different things. And i guess you have no use for the 'disipline' of cryptography or the use of codes, which uses reversals in quite a few modes.

Posts: 3416
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 2:54 pm

Poooooot wrote:I hate numerology. It's way too easy to turn nothing into something.

I could'nt agree with you more on that.

Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:15 am

Jorgemario

Upper-Case ASCII Codes = 751=7+5+1=13
Logical Alphanumeric Mode =111
Alphanumeric Basis 100 Mode = 1101
Alphanumeric Basis 3 Mode = 333
Alphanumeric Basis 6 Mode = 666

Alphanumeric Basis 9 Mode = 999
Alphanumeric Basis 36 Mode = 461= 4+6+1= 11
Lower-Case ASCII Codes = 1071 = 1+0+7+1 = 9

Posts: 831
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:17 pm

Yeduthun wrote:Look Zeta & Poooot, all I was doing was showing the error in Zanbag's post and explained what the numeric modes he was using, because he used Alphanumeric 6 in one & Alphanumeric 9 in another.I then gave a link to support it. I made no claims whatsoever, I never even mentioned numerology! All I said was the 'interesting' fact of the words 'internet' and 'computer' came up 666 in basis 6 & basis 6 reversed numerics .Numerics and Numerology are 2 different things. And i guess you have no use for the 'disipline' of cryptography or the use of codes, which uses reversals in quite a few modes.

Don't take me wrong, I'm not taking a pop at you for pointing out the errors, that's all fine and dandy.

And the difference between cryptography and what is displayed in the OP, is that the cryptograhers codes are intentional, they are manufactured soley for the purpose of disguising the true meaning within another message, what Zanbag has done is applying an arbitary code over words that had no intention of being a message. There is also the other factor of language, which spellings should be used?

Lets take Jesus Christ for example (any numerologists feel free to do your thing with the below example, as I would be interested to see if the results match up when using differing languages)

English - Jesus Christ
Afrikaans - Jesus Christus (an additional letter)
Azerbaijani - İsa Məsih ( two letter shorter than the English so wont equal the same amount)
Basque - Jesus Kristo (differing letters used for same sounds, but I'm sure the differing letters will yield differing results)
Catalan - Jesús Crist
Dutch - Jezus christus

There are a few using the Roman alphabet... What about other written languages like.....

Armenian - հիսուս Քրիստոսը
Bengali - যীশু খ্রি্ট
Chinese - 耶穌基督
Japanese (hiragana) - イエス·キリスト (lets not forget that Japanese has a further two writing systems, Kanji and Katagana)
Korean - 예수 그리스도
Russian - Иисус Христос

Would the results still be the same? I'm going to take a stab at this and say NO.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------

Posts: 2929
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:23 pm
Location: The beach

there is no way this dude is the antichrist , cause we ALL know that the real antichrist is :
Ronald Wilson Reagan

.....or

this dude

...or

or

or most definitely this kid

dang
i give up....
WE ARE THE GLOBAL POLITICAL AWAKENING !

Posts: 5995
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 8:03 am
Location: FEMA SECTOR V

ZetaRediculous wrote:
Yeduthun wrote:Look Zeta & Poooot, all I was doing was showing the error in Zanbag's post and explained what the numeric modes he was using, because he used Alphanumeric 6 in one & Alphanumeric 9 in another.I then gave a link to support it. I made no claims whatsoever, I never even mentioned numerology! All I said was the 'interesting' fact of the words 'internet' and 'computer' came up 666 in basis 6 & basis 6 reversed numerics .Numerics and Numerology are 2 different things. And i guess you have no use for the 'disipline' of cryptography or the use of codes, which uses reversals in quite a few modes.

Don't take me wrong, I'm not taking a pop at you for pointing out the errors, that's all fine and dandy.

And the difference between cryptography and what is displayed in the OP, is that the cryptograhers codes are intentional, they are manufactured soley for the purpose of disguising the true meaning within another message, what Zanbag has done is applying an arbitary code over words that had no intention of being a message. There is also the other factor of language, which spellings should be used?

Lets take Jesus Christ for example (any numerologists feel free to do your thing with the below example, as I would be interested to see if the results match up when using differing languages)

English - Jesus Christ
Afrikaans - Jesus Christus (an additional letter)
Azerbaijani - İsa Məsih ( two letter shorter than the English so wont equal the same amount)
Basque - Jesus Kristo (differing letters used for same sounds, but I'm sure the differing letters will yield differing results)
Catalan - Jesús Crist
Dutch - Jezus christus

There are a few using the Roman alphabet... What about other written languages like.....

Armenian - հիսուս Քրիստոսը
Bengali - যীশু খ্রি্ট
Chinese - 耶穌基督
Japanese (hiragana) - イエス·キリスト (lets not forget that Japanese has a further two writing systems, Kanji and Katagana)
Korean - 예수 그리스도
Russian - Иисус Христос

Would the results still be the same? I'm going to take a stab at this and say NO.

“What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.” -Albert Pine

Posts: 3138
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:35 pm

ZetaRediculous wrote:
Yeduthun wrote:Look Zeta & Poooot, all I was doing was showing the error in Zanbag's post and explained what the numeric modes he was using, because he used Alphanumeric 6 in one & Alphanumeric 9 in another.I then gave a link to support it. I made no claims whatsoever, I never even mentioned numerology! All I said was the 'interesting' fact of the words 'internet' and 'computer' came up 666 in basis 6 & basis 6 reversed numerics .Numerics and Numerology are 2 different things. And i guess you have no use for the 'disipline' of cryptography or the use of codes, which uses reversals in quite a few modes.

Don't take me wrong, I'm not taking a pop at you for pointing out the errors, that's all fine and dandy.

And the difference between cryptography and what is displayed in the OP, is that the cryptograhers codes are intentional, they are manufactured soley for the purpose of disguising the true meaning within another message, what Zanbag has done is applying an arbitary code over words that had no intention of being a message. There is also the other factor of language, which spellings should be used?

Lets take Jesus Christ for example (any numerologists feel free to do your thing with the below example, as I would be interested to see if the results match up when using differing languages)

English - Jesus Christ
Afrikaans - Jesus Christus (an additional letter)
Azerbaijani - İsa Məsih ( two letter shorter than the English so wont equal the same amount)
Basque - Jesus Kristo (differing letters used for same sounds, but I'm sure the differing letters will yield differing results)
Catalan - Jesús Crist
Dutch - Jezus christus

There are a few using the Roman alphabet... What about other written languages like.....

Armenian - հիսուս Քրիստոսը
Bengali - যীশু খ্রি্ট
Chinese - 耶穌基督
Japanese (hiragana) - イエス·キリスト (lets not forget that Japanese has a further two writing systems, Kanji and Katagana)
Korean - 예수 그리스도
Russian - Иисус Христос

Would the results still be the same? I'm going to take a stab at this and say NO.

I'm reusing this because I love it and because I can.

Unfortunately, like I said,

Posts: 7438
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

First of all, his name is Jorge Mario Bergoglio, not Bergoglios.
But even if it was, it still doesn't add up to 666.
See for yourself...

http://www.angelfire.com/nt/baptist/Pro ... lator.html

BERGOGLIOS=654

Posts: 7438
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:24 pm

Pope D Francis = 756 not 666

(And what pray tell, does the 'D' stand for?)

Posts: 5587
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:05 pm
Location: Left of centre

WillEase666 wrote:Pope D Francis = 756 not 666

(And what pray tell, does the 'D' stand for?)

Dave?

PreviousNext
• Related topics
Replies
Views
Last post