KGB INSTRUCTIONS FOR OBAMA . PART1 PART 1.Mikhail Kryzhanovs

[Acee22 Profile]

KGB INSTRUCTIONS FOR OBAMA ("THE PROFESSIONAL" system). PART 1.Mikhail Kryzhanovsky1
TOP SECRET CIA FILE



MIKHAIL KRYZHANOVSKY . "THE PROFESSIONAL" system



This top secret handbook on how to rule America and the world was written in 1996 at CIA order by Mikhail Kryzhanovsky, KGB superspy and CIA/FBI "Filament".



PART I. TOP POLITICAL MANAGEMENT

Chapter 1. Presidential Election ( a mythmaking championship)



America is divided . If a Democrat is elected the U.S President, he has to offer his Рepublican opponent the VP Office – that’s the only way we can unite the nation. (My 2012 presidential election message).

1.1 How a President is Nominated and Elected

The Conventions.

The national conventions of both major parties are held during the summer of a presidential election year. Earlier,each party selects delegates by primaries, conventions,committees,etc. At each convention, a temporary chairman is chosen. After a credentials committee seats the delegates, a permanent chairman is elected. The convention then votes n a platform, drawn up by the platform committee. By the third or fourth day, presidential nominations begin. The chairman calls the roll of states alphabetically. A state may place a candidate in nomination or yield to another state. Voting, again alphabeticaly by roll call of states, begins after all nominations have been made and seconded. A simple majority is required in each party, although this may require many ballots.

Finally, the vice-presidential candidate is selected. Although there is no law saying that the candidates must come from different states, it is, practically, necessary for this to be the case. Otherwise, according to the Constitution, electors from that state could vote only of the candidates and would have to cast their other vote for some person of another state. This could result in a presidential candidate’s receiving a majority electoral vote and his or her running mate’s failing to do so.

The Electoral College.

The next step in the process is the nomination of electors in each state, according to its laws. These electors must not be federal office holders. In the November election, the voters cast their votes for electors, not for president. In some states,the ballots include only the names of the presidential and vice-presidential candidates; in others, they include only names of the electors. Nowadays, it’s rare for electors to be split between parties. The last such occurance was in North Carolina in 1968. On four occasions (last was in 2000),the presidential candidate with the largest popular vote failed to obtain an electoral vote majority. Each state has as many electors as it has senators and representatives, plus 3 electoral votes from the District of Columbia as a result of the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution.

On the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December, the electors caast their votes in their respective state capitols. Constitutionally they may vote for someone other than the party candidate but usually they do not since they are pledged to one party and its candidate on the ballot. Should the presidential or vice-presidential candidate die between the November election and the December meetings, the electors pledged to vote for him or her could vote for whomever they pleased. However, it seems certain that the national committee would attempt to get an agreement among the state party leaders for a replacement candidate.

The votes of the electors, certified by the states, are sent to Congress, where the president of the Senate opens the certificates and has them counted in the presence of both houses on January 6. The new president is inaugurated at noon January 20.

Should no candidate receive a majority of the electoral vote for president, the House of Representatives chooses a president from among the three highest candidates, voting, not as individuals, but as states, with a majority (now 26) needed to elect. Should no vice-presidential candidate obtain the majority, the Senate, voting as individuals, chooses from the highest two.



1.2. Reality Check

The formal requirements for the Presidency, as the Constitution says, are simple: a candidate must be a natural-born US citizen, at least 35 years of age and a US resident for at least 14 years. These requirements meet the technical minimum, but the informal and sometimes less apparent ones are equally important. You must have “political availability,” which means political experience; be attractive (for political activists and general voting public); and project personal characteristics that enable the public to envision you as President. Voters and sponsors must believe that only you deserve to represent them for the next four years.

If you pass the above tests, ask yourself six simple questions:

1. Am I a governor?

2. Am I a Congressman?

3. Am I a Senator?

4. Am I a Cabinet member?

5. Am I a lawyer?

6. Am I a leader?

The last question is the easiest.

Qualities of a leader:

1. Technical/specific skill at some task at hand.

2. Charisma - attractiveness to others and the ability to leverage this esteem to motivate others.

3. Preoccupation with a role - dedication that consumes much of leader’s life – service to a cause.

4. A clear sense of purpose (or mission) clear goals – focus – commitment.

5. Results-orientation – directing very action towards a mission – prioritizing activities to spend time where results most accrue.

6. Cooperation - work well with others.

7. Optimism - very few pessimists become leaders.

8. Rejection of determinism - belief in one’s ability to “make a difference”.

9. Self-knowledge (in non-bureaucratic structures).

10. Self-awareness - the ability to “lead” one’s on self prior to leading to leading other selves similarly.

11. Awareness of environment - the ability to understand the environment they lead in and how they affect and are affected by it.

12. With regards to people and projects, the ability to choose winners – recognizing that, unlike with skills, one cannot teach attitude.

13. Empathy - understanding what others say, rather than listening to how they say things – this could partly sum this quality up as “walking in someone else’s shoes”.

Integrity - the integration of outward actions and inner values.

Leadership styles

1. Vision. outstanding leaders articulate an ideological vision congruent with the deeply-held values of followers, a vision that describes a better future to which the followers have an alleged moral right.

2. Passion and sacrifice. Leaders display a passion for, and have a strong conviction of, what they regard as the moral correctness of their vision. They engage in outstanding or extraordinary behavior and make extraordinary self-sacrifices in the interest of their vision and mission.

3. Confidence, determination and persistence. Outstanding leaders display a high degree of faith in themselves and in the attainment of the vision they articulate. Such leaders need to have a very high degree of self-confidence and moral conviction because their mission usually challenges the status-quo and, therefore, may offend those who have a stake in preserving the established order.

4. Image-building. Leaders must be self-conscious about his own image. He recognizes the desirability of followers perceiving them as competent, credible and trustworthy.

5. Role-modeling. Leader-image-building sets the stage for effective role-modeling because followers identify with the values of role models whom they perceived in positive terms.

6. External representation. Outstanding leaders act as spokespersons for their respective organizations and symbolically represent those organizations to external constituencies.

7. Expectations of and confidence in followers. Outstanding leaders communicate expectations of high performance from their followers and strong confidence in their followers’ ability to meet such expectations.

8. Selective motive-arousal. Outstanding leaders selectively arouse those motives of followers that the leaders see as special relevance to the successful accomplishment of the vision and mission.

9. Frame alignment. To persuade followers to accept and implement change , outstanding leaders engage in “frame alignment”. This refers to the linkage of individual and leader interpretive orientations such that some set of followers ‘s interests, values and beliefs, as well as the leader’s activities, goals and ideology, becomes congruent and complementary.

10. Inspirational communication. Outstanding leaders often, but not always, communicate their message in an inspirational manner using vivid stories, slogans, symbols and ceremonies.

A leader can have one or more visions of the future to aid him to move a nation successfully towards this goal. A vision, for effectiveness, should allegedly :

- appear as a simple, yet vibrant, image in the mind of the leader

- describe a future state, credible and preferable to the present state

- act as a bridge between the current state and a future optimum state

- appear desirable enough to energize followers

- succeed in speaking to followers at an emotional or spiritual level

For leadership to occur, leaders must not just see the vision themselves, they must have the ability to get others to see it also. You can use techniques like metaphors, symbolic actions, leading by example, incentives and penalties.

Distinctions between managers and leaders:

Managers administer, leaders innovate.

Managers as how and when, leaders ask what and why.

Managers focus on systems, leaders focus on people.

Managers do things right, leaders do the right things.

Managers maintain, leaders develop.

Managers rely on control, leaders inspire trust.

Managers have a short-term perspective, leaders have a long-term perspective,

Managers accept the status-quo, leaders challenge the status-quo.

Managers have an eye on the bottom-line, leaders have an eye on the horizon

Managers imitate, leaders originate.

Managers emulate the classic good soldier, leaders are their own person.

Managers copy, leaders show originality.



Seventeen US Presidents previously served as Governors: Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren, William Harrison, John Tyler, James Polk, Andrew Johnson, Rutherford Hayes, Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William Taft, Woodrow Wilson, Calvin Coolidge, Franklin Roosevelt, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush.

Nineteen US Presidents were Congressmen: James Madison, John Adams, Andrew Jackson, William Harrison, John Tyler, James Polk, Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Rutherford Hayes, James Garfield, William McKinley, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, George Bush.

Fifteen US Presidents were Senators: James Monroe, John Adams, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, William Harrison, John Tyler, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Benjamin Harrison, Warren Harding, Harry Truman, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon.

Six were Secretaries of State — Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Adams, Martin Van Buren, James Buchanan.

Two were Secretaries of War — Ulysses S. Grant and William Taft.

One was a Secretary of Commerce — Herbert Hoover.

And a full twenty-six US Presidents were lawyers: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Adams, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, John Tyler, James Polk, Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Abraham Lincoln, Rutherford Hayes, James Garfield, Chester Arthur, Grover Cleveland, Benjamin Harrison, William McKinley, William Howard Taft, Woodrow Wilson, Calvin Coolidge, Franklin Roosevelt, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Bill Clinton.

However, without wishing to dampen your enthusiasm, I must add that 8 Governors, 7 US Senators, 9 US Congressmen, 11 Mayors, 17 State Legislators and 11 judges have been violently attacked by 2005.

1.3 The Bilderberg Group

The Bilderberg Group is an annual invitation-only conference of around 100 guests, most of whom are usually influential politicians and big business. The title comes from the location of its first official meeting in 1954 in the Bilderberg Hotel, Arnhem, Netherlands. Its main office is now in Leiden, South Holland, the group’s current Chairman is Etienne Davignon, a former Vice President of the European Commission. The original intention of the group was to further the understanding between Western Europe and North America through informal and closed for media and public meetings between powerful individuals. Of course, that’s not what they are doing. If you look through the guests’ lists, you can find some very popular names like David Rockefeller, Donald Rumsfeld and George Soros. Lists differ each year, but there’s one name that remains there for years - Henry Kissinger, a former Secretary of State, who rules the Bilderberg Group and rules the world. Bill Clinton, the Arkansas Governor and 1992 presidential nominee went to Baden-Baden and attended the Conference on June 6 1991.



1.4 Democrat or Republican - Choosing Sides

The next step is to decide whether you want to be cast as a liberal (Democrat) or conservative (Republican). If you don’t take a definite side, you will be labeled as a moderate liberal-conservative.

You are a Democrat if you:

1. Embrace national government resolutions to public problems.

2. Believe that the national government should intervene in the economy to ensure its health, to support social
rest here http://members.beforeitsnews.com/story/ ... ovsky.html