Mexico admitts to Second Maya 2012 end of world reference

[Newearthman Profile Website]

The Tortuguero inscription describes something that is supposed to occur in 2012 involving Bolon Yokte, a mysterious Mayan god associated with both war and creation.

However, erosion and a crack in the stone make the end of the passage almost illegible, though some read the last eroded glyphs as perhaps saying, "He will descend from the sky."

The Comalcalco brick is also odd in that the molded or inscribed faces of the bricks were probably laid facing inward or covered with stucco, suggesting they were not meant to be seen



Read more: http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/lifest ... z1eujWas2y

[Chronicnerd Profile]

The Tortuguero inscription describes something that is supposed to occur in 2012 involving Bolon Yokte, a mysterious Mayan god associated with both war and creation.

However, erosion and a crack in the stone make the end of the passage almost illegible, though some read the last eroded glyphs as perhaps saying, "He will descend from the sky."

The Comalcalco brick is also odd in that the molded or inscribed faces of the bricks were probably laid facing inward or covered with stucco, suggesting they were not meant to be seen



Read more: http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/lifest ... z1eujWas2y

Both Central and South American governments will be releasing more artifacts through the first two quarters of 2012.

The translation of the verb you picked from the Fox quote is *close* to correct...it really is translated from Huli (he/she/it arrives):

In fact, the third glyph on the brick seems to read as the verb huli, "he/she/it arrives."

Although the Mayans were *thought* to be more masculine oriented when they talked in verbs with several potential genders, and the understood context was based on the structure of the sentence or the general conversation and implied context based on the conversation.

However, at this time from the news blurbs there is no real "context" as to what their reference for the verb might be...and as such the context is actually being translated, in some cases, in the masculine form.

For now, until the 60+ Mayan experts meeting to "straighten out" the references to the 2012 December 21st date...this next month of December 2011 (cutting it a little close eh?), in most of their references they have just kept it as "he/she/it"...until the full context of the brick can be agreed upon as to the right context of what "arrives" and how it applies to the Mayan Long Count 2012 Dec 21st date.

Of course, there are many artifacts being released over the next six to ten months in 2012 from more central and south American sources that, up until now, have only been seen by a very small group of people around the world.

Very curious... and the actual context of "Huli" has yet to be fully agreed upon at this time as to what gender (if any) the context of the verb is being used...



Good eyes and post!

[Spock Profile]

Exactly what I was thinking 2020

[Zionsfled Profile]

cool!