MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Writer
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:04 pm

PostSun Feb 07, 2010 12:56 am » by kingligger


How did this escape the Reprographic Dept at NASA? They did a great job at blurring
99.99% of the structures on the moon. Unfortunately for them it's that 0.01% that they missed that makes the difference.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:55 pm
Location: GERMANY

PostSun Feb 07, 2010 1:05 am » by Germanpils


kingligger wrote:How did this escape the Reprographic Dept at NASA? They did a great job at blurring
99.99% of the structures on the moon. Unfortunately for them it's that 0.01% that they missed that makes the difference.



Lol i thought the same ;)

as I say, its all in the very deep details

But NASA will not tell us about that in near future im 100% sure at that.

they know already know SO MUCH, when i read that thread that nasa knows about water
on mars since the 70s.... man this government is so currupt, they wont let us know...

i came to the point of my life that i WANT TO KNOW everything about the outer space,
which THEY already KNOW, its such a fucking shame...
this world is not only about us humans, no imagination could discribe

what has happened AND happening out there....
You know, you don't see with your eyes,
you see with your brain and the more
words your brain has, the more things you can see.
(KRS-ONE)

Writer
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:04 pm

PostSun Feb 07, 2010 1:17 am » by kingligger


ironically most of we know is what they tell us from they're space programmes. so if any moon fotoes r real, we r tryin 2 debunk unreal Nasa foto's & any Mars fotos r not real. This is real fuckin paranoia. Nah I tend 2 stick2 the truth. Nothing is true

Writer
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:46 am

PostSun Feb 07, 2010 6:50 am » by Russell1717


good

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:44 pm

PostSun Feb 07, 2010 7:57 am » by Pundz


It has already been posted on ATS, a long time ago. Come on guys, real "Mind bending stunning evidence"? Always the same old stuff.
The best evidence would be : Why we only have crappy pictures of the moon? I mean, we have far better quality pictures of mars...
PINDZ : " I WILL BLOW MYSELF UP RIGHT NOW, THIS THREAD SUCKS BIGTIME "

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:27 am

PostSun Feb 07, 2010 10:39 am » by Pauldamo


what i think is the main point about the tower theory is, that where the so called tower is supposed to be,you have drawn and colored in something that isn't even there,you have drawn in a vertical tower,when in fact it is only a part of the pattern in the formation on the ground,yes there is a shadow,but that,where the base of your tower would be, is actually an arm of a gully, branching off a formation of gullies,and the shadow is also one.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:55 pm
Location: GERMANY

PostSun Feb 07, 2010 11:58 am » by Germanpils


pundz wrote:It has already been posted on ATS, a long time ago. Come on guys, real "Mind bending stunning evidence"? Always the same old stuff.
The best evidence would be : Why we only have crappy pictures of the moon? I mean, we have far better quality pictures of mars...



The same picture?! And how long ago?
You know, you don't see with your eyes,
you see with your brain and the more
words your brain has, the more things you can see.
(KRS-ONE)

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:12 pm
Location: In a quiet corner of my mind

PostSun Feb 07, 2010 4:10 pm » by Scoundrel1975


pundz wrote:It has already been posted on ATS, a long time ago. Come on guys, real "Mind bending stunning evidence"? Always the same old stuff.
The best evidence would be : Why we only have crappy pictures of the moon? I mean, we have far better quality pictures of mars...



0uch! Now your walking on Germanpils sacred ground :ohno: this is his puppy he's so proud of
"These are Scoundrel Days"

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:55 pm
Location: GERMANY

PostSun Feb 07, 2010 4:17 pm » by Germanpils


scoundrel1975 wrote:
pundz wrote:It has already been posted on ATS, a long time ago. Come on guys, real "Mind bending stunning evidence"? Always the same old stuff.
The best evidence would be : Why we only have crappy pictures of the moon? I mean, we have far better quality pictures of mars...



0uch! Now your walking on Germanpils sacred ground :ohno: this is his puppy he's so proud of


lmao your right
You know, you don't see with your eyes,
you see with your brain and the more
words your brain has, the more things you can see.
(KRS-ONE)

Initiate
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:48 pm

PostTue Feb 09, 2010 12:32 am » by Ruquick


pauldamo wrote:what i think is the main point about the tower theory is, that where the so called tower is supposed to be,you have drawn and colored in something that isn't even there,you have drawn in a vertical tower,when in fact it is only a part of the pattern in the formation on the ground,yes there is a shadow,but that,where the base of your tower would be, is actually an arm of a gully, branching off a formation of gullies,and the shadow is also one.


absurd....look again. :roll:


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook