Monolith Structure Captured On NASA Mars Orbiter Camera

Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:34 am » by **maleman**

Maleman! Wow, you're so very clever!!!!!! I wish I could be as smart as you.
Just Kidding : > }

Apples and Oranges dude.

Try again.

O.K.....

What have your got here...

Really, what have you got here.... Besides something that you didn't get for yourself.

Dude...

Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:53 am » by **maleman**

[quote="maleman"]Maleman! Wow, you're so very clever!!!!!! I wish I could be as smart as you.
Just Kidding : > }

Apples and Oranges dude.

Try again.

With "quotes" like those, who needs any adult supervision...

Just kidding....

It sure is entertaing to read the teen-aged responses to posts...

Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:08 am » by **Seahawk100**

stone069 wrote:I might be inclined to believe it was bedrock or large boulder, If there were any other boulders present. I am not a mathematician, but it has to greatly reduce the odds of a natural formation when all of these stand alone. If there were some hills or mountains or ROCKS around it, then yes it is all paranoia. How else would it be the only thing in the area that formed this way yet everything else around them looks like crushed rock, by comparison.

You on the money, man! Square on.

Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:21 am » by **Seahawk100**

[quote]O.K.....

What have your got here...

Really, what have you got here.... Besides something that you didn't get for yourself./quote]

O.K. I don't quite know what you mean by "something that you didn't get for yourself."
Do you mean that I didn't understand? That I didn't originate the thread? Can you be a little clearer in your question?

What I can say, is that first of all- you're right- my initial words to you could be construed as a rather juvenile statement. However, please keep in mind that I wanted to keep it light, as opposed to being caustic- which is very easy for me to do with antagonistic posters who try to come across as more intelligent than others on the thread, but end up just being nothing more than condescending . Maybe, if I had for example said: "F*** Off, A**H***, I might not have been accused of having a teenage mentality. Oh Well, I can live with my choice. Hope you can.

I don't "have" anything here, or ever claimed to. I just came on to discuss and comment on the subject at hand, and the posibilites, with others interested in doing the same. You came on as if you had all the facts, you knew the true answers, and ha ha, look at the rest of these ignorami, too stupid and ignorant to know the "truth." They actually believe this stuff. Ha Ha. And, yes, I know that you didn't use those words- you were "cleverly" subtle- well, almost. The words that I use here, are to illustrate the fact that the effect is the same in either case- with either set of words- insults are insults.

Well, maybe the monoliths are just natural formations of "bedrock," - maybe not. At any rate, How can someone come across as so smug and self-righteous about something that, at this point in time, is nothing more than question marks and speculation. No scientific evidence/proof either way as far as I know. Maybe you know someone who's been up there to take a look? No? Well, until then- until we get a really close look at them, when we can make a real, factually-based, scientific asessment- speaking in absolutes is nothing but intelectually pretentious, absurd, and trully- sophomoric.

Dude is just another word for sir, man, fellow, chap. Sorry, are you female? Oh no, that's right- Maleman...as opposed to femaleman.

Just kidding.

Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:46 am » by **Bpeirce2**