Moon Atmosphere Caught With Cell Phone

Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:10 pm » by **Pindz**

Moon Atmosphere Caught With Cell Phone

ENHANCED PHOTO

ORIGINAL SIZE

________
Caught with poor mobile phone and binoculars by me.

Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:18 pm » by **Princessleia**

I like this image, the moon looks very cool!!! :flop:

Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:46 pm » by **Ruquick**

pindz wrote:Moon Atmosphere Caught With Cell Phone

ENHANCED PHOTO

ORIGINAL SIZE

________
Caught with poor mobile phone and binoculars by me.

I think what you're seeing there is the prism effect, caused by the binoculars

Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:53 pm » by **Pindz**

ruquick wrote:I think what you're seeing there is the prism effect, caused by the binoculars

sorry but nothing as "prism effect" doesnt exist .. google it ..

MOON HAS AN BREATHABLE ATMOSPHERE

Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:01 pm » by **Germanpils**

pindz wrote:
ruquick wrote:I think what you're seeing there is the prism effect, caused by the binoculars

sorry but nothing as "prism effect" doesnt exist .. google it ..

MOON HAS AN BREATHABLE ATMOSPHERE

yup thats a reason why theres civilisation up there

(officially no)

Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:14 pm » by **Lowsix**

pindz wrote:sorry but nothing as "prism effect" doesnt exist .. google it ..

Its called Chromatic Abberration, and it does exist, and it does explain this color around the moon
which comes from the shitty ass lens in his hamster driven, bicycle pedal-powered cell phone camera.

The moon has no atmosphere, because it doesn't have enough gravity.
Pindz wouldnt know this, because they don't allow girls to attend school in his third world country.

http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Glossar ... ion_01.htm

http://toothwalker.org/optics/chromatic.html

"Purple fringing: lens or sensor?

Chromatic aberration, and purple fringing in particular, have received considerable attention with the advent of digital cameras. Indeed, although chromatic aberrations can be noticed on film (Fig. 7), they do look more intense on CCD or CMOS images. On the one hand the digital photographer is only a few mouse clicks away from a full screen display, and few lenses stand image inspection at high magnification. On the other hand it is possible that digital imaging somehow renders the color fringes due to chromatic aberration more distinct. One of the proposed mechanisms is an enhanced spectral sensitivity in the (ultra)violet and (infra)red regimes, where lenses tend to be poorly corrected for chromatic aberration. Purple fringing is often blamed on sensor bloom, which is odd as blooming is a quite different phenomenon [15, 16]. In fact, there are as many arguments against sensor bloom as there are in favor of chromatic aberration to account for purple fringing. The examples shown on the present page are all demonstrably due to the lens and not to the sensor. Sensor bloom has no known color preference, and if it had, it would not change its colors upon defocusing a lens (as in Fig. 3) or upon swapping lenses (as in Fig. 4). The list of arguments is long [17]."

Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:29 pm » by **Marduk2012**

Low in attack-mode :twisted:

Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:17 pm » by **Jayson1972**

yah you have captured it with your high tec. cell phone. That is why the " atmosphere" is blue on top and yellow on the bottom of the moon. Get a life. Maybe there is atmospher maybe not.
But this sure as shit does not prove it. ffs. :robot:

Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:28 pm » by **Kerrblur2**

where im from in hawaii we call that a moon'boe, when there is moisture in the air and the light of the moon passes through and creates a rainbow

Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:51 pm » by **Ordell**

OP are you on drugz??

no offence if your not, i just really think you are. seem paranoid, like me.

very curious private msg me if you want.

i bet you would love learology and hoagland stuff. check it out if ya haven't already.

lear claims they blacked out the sky cause its really blue and yellow etc etc.

those two guys go on and on fantasizing about moon and mars. check it out!

"oh its all disinfo" - john lear