MOON CURRENTLY BEING EVACUATED
17 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
- Bettyboolean

-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:53 pm
You might like:
savwafair2012 wrote:SO WE ALL KNOW SOME KIND OF MINING OPERATION IS GOING ON ON THE MOON BUT WHY THIS MASS EVACUATION
lulz . . . that will take a long time then . . .
- Samuelthemule

-
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:23 am
- Location: 'Happiness is the angle at which the wise are gathered'
they say asstron auts get terribly lonely up there in space, because they are far away from the music of their native sphere.
cymatics is awesome

cymatics is awesome

"Almost anyone can be brought to believe anything, so long as he also believes everyone else believes it" Arthur Schopenhauer
- Willkillyouall

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:51 pm
looks like stars to me being gravitationly lensed
lol could be wee rocket or nuke bursts to keep the moon in orbit pmsl joking
cheers

A NASA photographer snapped an amazing image of the International Space Station next to the Moon. Though the objects look close enough to collide, the Moon is some 200,000 miles away from the Station..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... amera.html
The International Space Station was captured in an incredible image as the Moon loomed behind it.
Despite being 240 miles above, you don’t need specialist equipment to see the Station. In fact, this picture was taken two days ago by a Nasa photographer using an ordinary digital SLR camera – a Nikon D3S - as it passed above Houston.
In the right conditions, the orbiting lab can even be seen with the naked eye.
A pair of binoculars or a home telescope will reveal the structural shape of the craft.
Of course, the photographer did have a few extra bits of kit to help with the clarity, such as a 600mm lens, but nevertheless, it’s all equipment that can be ordered on the internet or bought at a camera shop.
The picture, meanwhile, is very deceptive because the Moon is actually well over 200,000 miles beyond the Station, but they look here as if they might collide.
The photographer, Lauren Harnett, told MailOnline that she was lucky to see the Station.
She said: 'It's amazing the amount of interest it has sparked, especially when it almost didn't happen due to an overcast sky.'
The construction of the Space Station began in 1998, and Nasa describe it as ‘the most complex scientific and technological endeavour ever undertaken’.
It is a test bed for future technologies and a research laboratory for new, advanced industrial materials, communications technology and medical research.
Nasa adds that the Space Station is ‘vital to human exploration’.
It says: ‘It’s where we’re learning how to combat the physiological effects of being in space for long periods.’
The statistics associated with the Station are mightily impressive.
It has more than 33,000 cubic feet (935 cubic metres) of habitable space - almost equal to the room inside one and a half Boeing 747 jetliners - weighs 925,000 pounds (419,600 kilograms) and measures 361 feet (110.03 metres) end to end, which is equivalent to a U.S. football field, including the end zones.

The station’s solar panels exceed the wingspan of a Boeing 777 and harness enough energy from the sun to provide electrical power to all station components and scientific experiments.
And it’s travelling at a whopping 17,500mph.
Five space agencies run it and once completed the research outpost will include contributions from the U.S., UK, Canada, Japan, Russia, Brazil, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland.

cheers


A NASA photographer snapped an amazing image of the International Space Station next to the Moon. Though the objects look close enough to collide, the Moon is some 200,000 miles away from the Station..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... amera.html
The International Space Station was captured in an incredible image as the Moon loomed behind it.
Despite being 240 miles above, you don’t need specialist equipment to see the Station. In fact, this picture was taken two days ago by a Nasa photographer using an ordinary digital SLR camera – a Nikon D3S - as it passed above Houston.
In the right conditions, the orbiting lab can even be seen with the naked eye.
A pair of binoculars or a home telescope will reveal the structural shape of the craft.
Of course, the photographer did have a few extra bits of kit to help with the clarity, such as a 600mm lens, but nevertheless, it’s all equipment that can be ordered on the internet or bought at a camera shop.
The picture, meanwhile, is very deceptive because the Moon is actually well over 200,000 miles beyond the Station, but they look here as if they might collide.
The photographer, Lauren Harnett, told MailOnline that she was lucky to see the Station.
She said: 'It's amazing the amount of interest it has sparked, especially when it almost didn't happen due to an overcast sky.'
The construction of the Space Station began in 1998, and Nasa describe it as ‘the most complex scientific and technological endeavour ever undertaken’.
It is a test bed for future technologies and a research laboratory for new, advanced industrial materials, communications technology and medical research.
Nasa adds that the Space Station is ‘vital to human exploration’.
It says: ‘It’s where we’re learning how to combat the physiological effects of being in space for long periods.’
The statistics associated with the Station are mightily impressive.
It has more than 33,000 cubic feet (935 cubic metres) of habitable space - almost equal to the room inside one and a half Boeing 747 jetliners - weighs 925,000 pounds (419,600 kilograms) and measures 361 feet (110.03 metres) end to end, which is equivalent to a U.S. football field, including the end zones.

The station’s solar panels exceed the wingspan of a Boeing 777 and harness enough energy from the sun to provide electrical power to all station components and scientific experiments.
And it’s travelling at a whopping 17,500mph.
Five space agencies run it and once completed the research outpost will include contributions from the U.S., UK, Canada, Japan, Russia, Brazil, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland.

- Shaggietrip

-
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:11 am
- Location: I am MEME
Ok, this video may seem to drag on but give it a bit of time and watch it through. Perhaps someone here can explain if what is being talked about are artifacts. If you have no patience it starts @3:30-10:10 @8:39 is good spot also.



17 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
-
- Related topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- Notre Dame Stadium Evacuated Twice due to UFOs And Lightning
by blaborde1488 » Tue Sep 06, 2011 4:32 pm - 5 Replies
- 547 Views
- Last post by cosmine

Tue Sep 06, 2011 5:03 pm
- Notre Dame Stadium Evacuated Twice due to UFOs And Lightning
-
- Moon Rising - Now we see the true moon guys & gals.
1, 2by gunzenbomz » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:20 pm - 12 Replies
- 1662 Views
- Last post by jetxvii

Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:07 am
- Moon Rising - Now we see the true moon guys & gals.
-
- Full Color Moon Showing Spectacular UFO's Over The Moon
by chrisfryfyi » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:30 am - 5 Replies
- 2346 Views
- Last post by theyrecomming

Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:46 am
- Full Color Moon Showing Spectacular UFO's Over The Moon
-
- 7 UFOs near Moon 9July2011 HD Too Big for 'Moon Orbs' OVNI
1, 2by serendipity » Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:27 am - 10 Replies
- 897 Views
- Last post by shaggietrip

Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:16 am
- 7 UFOs near Moon 9July2011 HD Too Big for 'Moon Orbs' OVNI
-
- Alien moon,Why NASA Never Returned To The Moon,
by bugmenot » Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:04 pm - 0 Replies
- 1464 Views
- Last post by bugmenot

Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:04 pm
- Alien moon,Why NASA Never Returned To The Moon,





