NASA: Mars Rover image show's Building's On Mars????

Super Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 15836
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:12 pm

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 6:46 pm » by Spock


savwafair2012 wrote:as for this
Image


I still don't see these structures move when the rover moves



Nothing that is attached to the rover is moving. Including the shield and the reflection of the rover in the shield.

Initiate
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:23 pm

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 6:53 pm » by Stotelos


Directly in front off the rover looks like broken pottery.
That doesnt look like a natural rock to me.

Writer
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:24 pm

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 8:01 pm » by Mindgamez


Don't we all know there are pyramids on mars in cydonia area. what makes you think there arent other structures on mars too?

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 843
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:41 pm

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 8:51 pm » by Bandanko


Reflection of the shield, its very easy to spot. Sav even provided the evidence :) nice one kid :)

Now those rocks DO look like pottery mate, you're bang on there.

Anyone else comment on the "rocks"? Has this already been debunked?

ps I love how sav launched into the hate hilled tirade earlier in post. The impotent rage of some people is truly hilarious ("dont post anything on my threads again"... lol such a child)

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7028
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:39 am

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 9:58 pm » by E6722maj


Image

:alien:
whatever

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1411
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:17 pm
Location: Wales

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 10:02 pm » by Cwmman


so the mars rover run over some ancient pottery ...... could have been from the ming dynasty
jk........ :flop:
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—
after they’ve tried everything else.
Winston Churchill.

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Oceanic 815

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 10:21 pm » by Epicfailure


This has already been debunked 2 times from what I have seen, once probably close to 8-10 months ago. and the last one was just this last week or so...

this is a fish eye lense point of view, there is no building. If there was a building and any possibility that it was a building I would be doing everything in my power to prove that.

don't believe it's a lense?

actually here is the thread it was debunked on:

http://disclose.tv/forum/mars-rover-tak ... 18547.html

here is the article detailing the fact that it is a fisheye lense that was being used:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36126734/ns ... nce-space/
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Oceanic 815

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 10:23 pm » by Epicfailure


P.S. those rocks look like mineral deprived rocks, or "petrified" rocks.
Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7028
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:39 am

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 11:03 pm » by E6722maj


Image

:alien:
whatever

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:24 pm

PostFri Dec 03, 2010 11:08 pm » by Pindz


savwafair2012 wrote:
P.S.
Don't ever fucking post anything on my threads again you fucking cock sucker.
Nobody give a shit about anything you have to say.

Image

:alien51: :flop:


PreviousNext

  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook