NASA on crusade to debunk 2012 apocalypse myths??

Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:01 pm » by **Cryptillian**

cornbread714 wrote:
cryptillian wrote:
unfortunately this magic does not exist

OH, YEAH?

Category 4 Societies: harnessing the power of the drinking bird

Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:19 pm » by **Cornbread714**

slushpup wrote:
How do we find a way to make it 100% efficient and clean?

It doesn't have to be 100% efficient and clean, it just needs to be reasonably sustainable and relatively non-polluting.

But, maybe there are just too goddam many of us. Maybe the NWO is right.

GET YOUR FLU SHOTS, PEOPLE!!

Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:22 pm » by **Cryptillian**

i hope that it is my limited understanding of the universe that makes me a skeptic.

i hope that one day people smarter and more informed than us can really create a theory and physical application of the theory.

imagine trying to explain nuclear reactions to neandertals.

uhg, uhg

(neandertal have to go work now.)

nice convo.

wicked thread slush.

Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:37 pm » by **TheDuck**

Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:40 pm » by **Cryptillian**

theduck wrote:

how was Farmtown?

does your wife have a seeder?

gotta have a seeder.

Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:24 pm » by **Darkplanet**

Ok...now I'm mildly worried. NASA's usual tactic when it comes to any space based conspiracy (Moon landing, Mars Face) is to completely ignore it. They don't even justify it with an attempted answer. In fact they even went as far as pulling a completed publication debunking moon landing conspiracies because they didn't want to justify the issue.

I don't believe in Planet X theories but when NASA comes out in force like this and given their history, that worries me. I mean, it sure makes them look like they're hiding something doesn't it?

Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:58 pm » by **TheDuck**

cryptillian wrote:
theduck wrote:

how was Farmtown?

does your wife have a seeder?

gotta have a seeder.

Of course she has pfft she ain't no amateur lol she even has an optical illusion waterfall made by yours truly. :peep:

Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:03 am » by **Pindz**

mep630 wrote:You know it is actually more like 2013 then 2012!

December 2012 is the end of the mayan calendar. Everyone is going to freak out on December 31, 2011 like idiots.

Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:12 am » by **grev**

i can't find the first part.

Upload to Disclose.tv

lol u guys. do some research.

Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:14 am » by **Sceptilief**

cryptillian wrote:
sceptilief wrote:But you agree with this: "Energy cannot be created nor destroyed, only transfered"

Do YOU see the glaring error?

If not, go read your 'approved' books and find solace in believing everything your told to believe. I'll be busy breaking down barriers.

PS. Take a look around the internet buddy. You'd be suprised at just how much our networked collective intelligence can open your eyes too (and no, I don't mean nibiru or 2012 for this statement)

the beautiful thing about science is that ideas progress but are always complimented and inspired by the previous ideas.........without Copernicus, and Newton and Galileo...eintsein would have been mathematically illiterate and all of his ideas would have had no way of being expressed.

as for the glaring error in my understanding of the conservation of energy.......no error dude.

free energy doesn't exist because the the TRANSFERENCE causes loss....energy is not static.....but nice try

the only barriers you can break down are the ones created by you rampant ignorance.

Do you think I stepped into this debate because I don't understand what the textbooks state now? You'd be silly to think otherwise.

Listen it's cool for you to believe what you believe man, but at the end of the day science is nothing more than just another belief system. And like the Bible, it's full of assumptions and false doctrine. One must accept the fallability of man in all belief systems, which Carl Sagan stated eloquently in "Demon Haunted World" (which I can't seem to find to pull the quote from), including science.

I consider myself a scientific man. And my observations of perpetual motion are all around me in the universe.

You're thinking too small and that's all I can say dude. I can't force you to expand your mind and step out of the box, that's up to you. But once you do, you'll see what I see, and understand what I mean.

But the minute you admit that God can exist by the very foundations of Quantum physics, than we can get into a discussion that doesn't involve namecalling (which I am guilty of. My apologies).

Peace Friend.