NASA on FOX no idea what these Orbs Of Light UFO's Are

Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:58 am » by **Zigoapex**

nasa coming clean ? well , just maybe cleaning under the rug a little, but it's a start.

Upload to Disclose.tv

Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:38 am » by **Skyking**

Can't trust FOX

Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:20 pm » by **Zigoapex**

skyking wrote:Can't trust FOX

doesnt matter if you trust fox or not, It's the fact that it was coming from nasa's higher up's

Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:26 pm » by **Malkere**

Can't trust NASA

haha, no seriously though...
both companies are made out of bologna and cheese.

thanks for sharing zigoapex

Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:37 pm » by **Seahawk**

I agree. Fox is broadcasting. The one being interviewed is from N.A.s.A., no? I'm surprised that this isn't getting more replies. It seems like this is one of the more substantial "breaks" in this subject. N.A.S.A. is finally admitting something substantial. I swear, it seems like we are going to have to beat some people over the heads with a live alien before they open their eyes to our reality. Lmao at those folks. Yeah, right. Whatever. It's just opinion, so don't get offensive, please.

Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:43 pm » by **Lahlaos**

at least they said they have spent time chasing those things and they dont know where they came from.

Acknowledgement of presence as far as im concerned.

Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:50 pm » by **TheDuck**

Cheers man, gonna share this, just checking out the documents that came with...

Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:52 pm » by **Chronicnerd**

lahlaos wrote:at least they said they have spent time chasing those things and they dont know where they came from.

Acknowledgement of presence as far as im concerned.

Yeah...my thoughts too...it is a good transition from "UFOs don't exist" to "Yeah, we aren't quite sure what they are, but as far as we can tell they pose no threat to us."

Which translates to: "We know there is something else out there, however we also know we can't say specifics on what it is, but we can say that they are not a threat to us."

Which in my opinion translates to:

1.) Known government technology...which government...not sure.
2.) Known extraterrestrial crafts that our government already can identify and has some form of friendly relationship with.

Either scenario is "good" IMO... if it is a government technology...cool...someone on our side has cool new toys. If it is ET oriented...cool...we got beings with rad-technology that we believe to be friendly.

Both cases are "good"...

Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:55 pm » by **Lahlaos**

chronicnerd wrote:
lahlaos wrote:at least they said they have spent time chasing those things and they dont know where they came from.

Acknowledgement of presence as far as im concerned.

Yeah...my thoughts too...it is a good transition from "UFOs don't exist" to "Yeah, we aren't quite sure what they are, but as far as we can tell they pose no threat to us."

Which translates to: "We know there is something else out there, however we also know we can't say specifics on what it is, but we can say that they are not a threat to us."

Which in my opinion translates to:

1.) Known government technology...which government...not sure.
2.) Known extraterrestrial crafts that our government already can identify and has some form of friendly relationship with.

Either scenario is "good" IMO... if it is a government technology...cool...someone on our side has cool new toys. If it is ET oriented...cool...we got beings with rad-technology that we believe to be friendly.

Both cases are "good"...

Or they just have no clue as to what they are. They do at times look like they are teasing the government..

Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:03 pm » by **TheDuck**

Ok just read through most of that document and its basically saying they're buoyant plasma charges "Nothing to see here"

They also say its/they're NOT from another country.

Edit: Download and read the document yourselves. http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/Freed ... ummary.htm