New Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation

[Muchtyman Profile]

good post savwafair2012 but you guys are 2 seconds behind each other in dis-info. First off look where the story came from , rense.com, probably one of the biggest zionist conspiracy sites online ,I cant believe you guys read that stuff but anyway,

first off what makes this dis-info, hmmm probably because it origianlly came from russia and is part of a dis-info war against american citizens to screw their heads up and get them confused so they dont know who to believe. "its Communist material your reading"

2nd problem , you are now trying to cause a disruption and in-fighting within the truther movement, they have done all the real tests and determined that there were controlled demolitions and there were thermite ect, but by you posting this you are saying they are wrong, and you would think after testing as much stuff as they did they would have too seen the evidence of a nuclear explosion, I think we all would have.which means you are helping the communists now by posting this stuff , your technically commiting treason which is a crime that undermines the government.But this is against the truthers and the government trying to add more confusion.


This is all lies, where were you on 911? did you not see what happened with your own eyes you watched it but now you gonna let people from around the world feed you this stuff and get you believing something different even after you witnessed the event!

People please get a hold of your own thoughts! stop buying into all this nonsense
if you think that the russians or the chinese give you this info to inform you because they care about you then your already brainwashed and most likely your already gone!

Please Start Fighting The NWO And Not Giving Them A Helping Hand

And it is very sad to see so much dis-info coming into disclose.tv forums and videos this week and whats worse as you people believe.it also the picture your showing is a picture of it falling with gravity not a picture of a mushroom cloud ,anyone can see that picture online of it in freefall.

Here is where your russian dis-info came from.

Upload to Disclose.tv

I Just reread your post Ghost ..........Talk about desparate !
At no time did you examine or evaluate my comments .
Got you taped Buddy ............

[Muchtyman Profile]

good post savwafair2012 but you guys are 2 seconds behind each other in dis-info. First off look where the story came from , rense.com, probably one of the biggest zionist conspiracy sites online ,I cant believe you guys read that stuff but anyway,

first off what makes this dis-info, hmmm probably because it origianlly came from russia and is part of a dis-info war against american citizens to screw their heads up and get them confused so they dont know who to believe. "its Communist material your reading"

2nd problem , you are now trying to cause a disruption and in-fighting within the truther movement, they have done all the real tests and determined that there were controlled demolitions and there were thermite ect, but by you posting this you are saying they are wrong, and you would think after testing as much stuff as they did they would have too seen the evidence of a nuclear explosion, I think we all would have.which means you are helping the communists now by posting this stuff , your technically commiting treason which is a crime that undermines the government.But this is against the truthers and the government trying to add more confusion.


This is all lies, where were you on 911? did you not see what happened with your own eyes you watched it but now you gonna let people from around the world feed you this stuff and get you believing something different even after you witnessed the event!

People please get a hold of your own thoughts! stop buying into all this nonsense
if you think that the russians or the chinese give you this info to inform you because they care about you then your already brainwashed and most likely your already gone!

Please Start Fighting The NWO And Not Giving Them A Helping Hand

And it is very sad to see so much dis-info coming into disclose.tv forums and videos this week and whats worse as you people believe.it

I appreciate your opinion and that you're willing to express it. You may be right about all of the above, ultimately I don't know but I don't think you do either if we're being fair. You've made several claims but haven't offered much support of them. I can agree that rense isn't the best source, but this didn't "come from" there. Even if you are absolutely right though, you didn't do much to explain why that is.

In regard to the thermite/thermate at least, I did specifically mention that I didn't think it was one or the other. As for treason, sorry but that's a pretty ridiculous accusation. I agree that "infighting" isn't going to help matters, so consider the tone of your above post in regards to the posts you're responding to and set the standard for that ideal.

Hi Hack .... Paranoia generally ain't my thing,............Unfortunately you do have to consider that some guys on this site do have an agenda .

I do try to be openminded ,but the following is a bit of a giveaway .......

People please get a hold of your own thoughts! stop buying into all this nonsense
if you think that the russians or the chinese give you this info to inform you because they care about you then your already brainwashed and most likely your already gone!

Please Start Fighting The NWO And Not Giving Them A Helping Hand



Maybe I'm being a bit harsh ...............Perhaps you're incapable of thinking outside the box .

[Muchtyman Profile]

good post savwafair2012 but you guys are 2 seconds behind each other in dis-info. First off look where the story came from , rense.com, probably one of the biggest zionist conspiracy sites online ,I cant believe you guys read that stuff but anyway,

first off what makes this dis-info, hmmm probably because it origianlly came from russia and is part of a dis-info war against american citizens to screw their heads up and get them confused so they dont know who to believe. "its Communist material your reading"

2nd problem , you are now trying to cause a disruption and in-fighting within the truther movement, they have done all the real tests and determined that there were controlled demolitions and there were thermite ect, but by you posting this you are saying they are wrong, and you would think after testing as much stuff as they did they would have too seen the evidence of a nuclear explosion, I think we all would have.which means you are helping the communists now by posting this stuff , your technically commiting treason which is a crime that undermines the government.But this is against the truthers and the government trying to add more confusion.


This is all lies, where were you on 911? did you not see what happened with your own eyes you watched it but now you gonna let people from around the world feed you this stuff and get you believing something different even after you witnessed the event!

People please get a hold of your own thoughts! stop buying into all this nonsense
if you think that the russians or the chinese give you this info to inform you because they care about you then your already brainwashed and most likely your already gone!

Please Start Fighting The NWO And Not Giving Them A Helping Hand

And it is very sad to see so much dis-info coming into disclose.tv forums and videos this week and whats worse as you people believe.it

I appreciate your opinion and that you're willing to express it. You may be right about all of the above, ultimately I don't know but I don't think you do either if we're being fair. You've made several claims but haven't offered much support of them. I can agree that rense isn't the best source, but this didn't "come from" there. Even if you are absolutely right though, you didn't do much to explain why that is.

In regard to the thermite/thermate at least, I did specifically mention that I didn't think it was one or the other. As for treason, sorry but that's a pretty ridiculous accusation. I agree that "infighting" isn't going to help matters, so consider the tone of your above post in regards to the posts you're responding to and set the standard for that ideal.

Hi Hack .... Paranoia generally ain't my thing,............Unfortunately you do have to consider that some guys on this site do have an agenda .

I do try to be openminded ,but the following is a bit of a giveaway .......

People please get a hold of your own thoughts! stop buying into all this nonsense
if you think that the russians or the chinese give you this info to inform you because they care about you then your already brainwashed and most likely your already gone!

Please Start Fighting The NWO And Not Giving Them A Helping Hand



Maybe I'm being a bit harsh ...............Perhaps he's incapable of thinking outside the box .

[Cee420 Profile]

How come there was molten rock under the debris ?
Car engines melting , hundreds of yards away from the collapse ...

This is a vid that should be watched ..........

[youtube]a_UsC6GvKf0&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

Hey.

This is not molten rock, but ‘bed rock’ …and it got shaped by water (and rocks) to look like that

..and this serves another evidence that there was not any “nuclear cavities” under the three WTC buildings ..cause they scrapped everything out all the way to the bed rock and found no “nuclear cavities”.
-
-
-

This “all engine blocks melting away” ..is a myth ..and I doubt it is true

Here is a picture of one of those trucks, whose engine supposedly “melted away”

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/ ... ruck-3.jpg

…but if the truck is similar to this one here .. the engine ,pretty much can’t be even seen from where the picture was taken …the engine is further back and under the cockpit

http://www.brunswickme.org/fire/Apparatus/engine2b.jpg
So at least this picture of a burned truck don’t prove “all the engines melted away” ..cause clearly they don’t seem to know how trucks are built in the first place!


Here are many pictures of the burned cars ..but I can’t see even one picture that would show clearly a car with it’s engine melted a way.
..why are some cars “wilted” ..they most likely got hit with something ejected from the Twin Towers or WTC 7
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/ ... ml#toasted


Peace.

[Muchtyman Profile]

How come there was molten rock under the debris ?
Car engines melting , hundreds of yards away from the collapse ...

This is a vid that should be watched ..........

[youtube]a_UsC6GvKf0&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

Hey.

This is not molten rock, but ‘bed rock’ …and it got shaped by water (and rocks) to look like that

..and this serves another evidence that there was not any “nuclear cavities” under the three WTC buildings ..cause they scrapped everything out all the way to the bed rock and found no “nuclear cavities”.
-
-
-

This “all engine blocks melting away” ..is a myth ..and I doubt it is true

Here is a picture of one of those trucks, whose engine supposedly “melted away”

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/ ... ruck-3.jpg

…but if the truck is similar to this one here .. the engine ,pretty much can’t be even seen from where the picture was taken …the engine is further back and under the cockpit

http://www.brunswickme.org/fire/Apparatus/engine2b.jpg
So at least this picture of a burned truck don’t prove “all the engines melted away” ..cause clearly they don’t seem to know how trucks are built in the first place!


Here are many pictures of the burned cars ..but I can’t see even one picture that would show clearly a car with it’s engine melted a way.
..why are some cars “wilted” ..they most likely got hit with something ejected from the Twin Towers or WTC 7
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/ ... ml#toasted


Peace.

No problems ..........Helluva lot of disinfo out there. The truth will out eventually .

Hopefully in my lifetime ..................

[Cee420 Profile]

No problems ..........Helluva lot of disinfo out there. The truth will out eventually .

Hopefully in my lifetime ..................

Yea, there sure is alot of disinfo about 9/11 ..thank god, many times it's quite easy to debunk
..like this Dimitri Khalezov

..and cause there is so much disinfo out there, it is wise to keep with the things we can proove ..and not even try to deliver the "whole picture"

I personally don't even think about the Pentagon hit that much, or NORAD, or any other 9/11 oddities, but i stick to the nano-thermite, cause that is something SOLID ... and nano-thermite is also something that the US gov hasn't investigated ..so this is what the Truthers should push for = to get US gov to investigate the nano-thermite

Peace, bro

[Ringwind Profile]

Google "9/11 Nukes - Radiation-induced cancers"

[Ronisrael Profile]

Dimitri Khalezov gives the best explanation for 911 WTC .

If you watch all 26 parts - you get full detailed answers.

and will not give disinfo comments such as - "if the nuke was under the building why some of the core was still standing for few seconds ... "

even i can answer to that comment - i watched the whole interview :

The nuke was not directly placed under wtc tower -
see min 8:50




And if you really have burning sincere questions

you can ask Dimitri himself ,questions and he will answer you here :
his nick is 911thology
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum ... 29915/pg44

and see if you are satisfied with his answers

[Cee420 Profile]

Dimitri Khalezov gives the best explanation for 911 WTC .

If you watch all 26 parts - you get full detailed answers.

and will not give disinfo comments such as - "if the nuke was under the building why some of the core was still standing for few seconds ... "

even i can answer to that comment - i watched the whole interview :

The nuke was not directly placed under wtc tower -
see min 8:50




And if you really have burning sincere questions

you can ask Dimitri himself ,questions and he will answer you here :
his nick is 911thology
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum ... 29915/pg44

and see if you are satisfied with his answers

Hey.

(this is a cut and paste post I made onto another thread also)

I must have skipped over this parts 15 and 16 of this interview when I watched these videos, so I didn’t realize he gives also ANOTHER detonation scheme later ..so my bad

But..
It’s abit odd to me; Why did Dimitri Khalezov first draw pictures of the ”nuke detonation scheme” for the nuke and “nuclear cavity” to be directly under the center of the tower ..and then later say it was placed on “more to one side” and not directly on the center?!

Why doesn’t he give the REAL ONE from the start

And on his web site he also explain the nuke detonation of the WTC buildings and placing the nuke right under the center of the tower(s).
http://www.nuclear-demolition.com/911-w ... works.html
..On this web site he’s not even showing the “on the side-detonation scheme” at all and shows only this “center detonation model”..But then later, tells that this is not the ACTUAL demolition scheme, but still doesn’t show this “side detonation scheme”
On this web page, linked above, Khalezov writes a “disclaimer” in the end:

“As it was mentioned in the beginning, this article does not describe any nuclear demolition scheme of a particular building in any exact detail, but does it rather on a conceptual level. But there is another article that describes a nuclear demolition scheme of the World Trade Center in New York in particular.”

…why does he explain it this way? ..first show the detonation directly under the buildings ..then later changes the detonations on the side of the buildings?!
Why doesn’t he explain right away how it supposedly went in reality? ..althou he’s using the shape and size of the WTC Tower(s) to explain he’s theory?!


Is he “thought controlling” the reader?
..leading the reader to partly believe he’s theory with this “visual explanation chart of the center-detonation scheme”, which would seem more plausible detonation scheme (to me anyway)
..and when the reader is somewhat “open to this theory”, he then changes the detonation scheme to the “not so plausible one”, to the “on the side detonation scheme”.


In his book, he explains this the same way ..first he gives the” center-detonation scheme” ..and then later he changes it to his REAL suggested detonation scheme, the “on the side” one. ( I didn’t read his book, just went through it)
You can download his book as a pdf. here:
http://depositfiles.com/en/files/s5socosne


Peace.