New Terrorist Attacks In Few Months?

Super Moderator
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:42 pm

PostSat Aug 09, 2008 9:08 pm » by Tontodc


(From PDF file:)

You've probably never heard of Juval Aviv. He was an Israeli Mossad

agent (their CIA). A real James Bond. He gave information to our federal
government about 9/11 and the details of how it would happen, one month

before the attack on September 11 occurred. He informed the FBI and CIA

in August 2001 that as many as 200 terrorists were slipping into the United

States and planning "a major assault on the United States." He cautioned

that it had picked up indications of a "large-scale target" in the United States

and that Americans would be "very vulnerable." He also gave the exact

details of the London subway bombing to MI5 (their CIA) one week before it

happened. He is currently a consultant to the US Congress. Here is what

he says now, once again in August 2008 and what you need to know.





Aviv says the next attack will come in a few months and will involve suicide

bombers and non-suicide bombers in places that people congregate like

Disneyland, Las Vegas, and big cities like New York, San Francisco, and

Chicago. It will be in shopping malls, subways at rush hour, train stations,

casinos, and football stadiums, as well as in rural America in places like

Wyoming and Montana. The coming attack will be simultaneous detonations

around the country in five to eight cities and the rural areas. This

information is well known to the CIA and FBI and has been for years, but

the US Federal Government is not saying anything publicly about it, in order

not to alarm its citizens. He also says that the US response to this new

attack will be for the US to attack both Iran and Syria in return and before

Bush leaves office.


To download full PDF file: http://www.projectcamelot.org/Juval_Avi ... t_2008.pdf


What do you guys think about this? According to Juval Aviv 9/11 wasn´t faked?
Image

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Florida

PostSat Aug 09, 2008 10:00 pm » by Estanislao


my vote is, he's a disinformation agent.

The U.S. doesn't want us to panick?! :lol: Then what's the Terror Alert Level sign about?

911 wasn't faked? that's a dead give-away.

My guess:

He's mossad, but he's also CIA and he's used to drum up fear in Congress so when Israel does their false-flag thing, Congress will support Israel in a war against Iran.

Hell, Congress just up'd Israel's monetary support by $30 billion MORE.
plus we got a couple MORE aircraft carriers headed that way.

This is SO Hitleresque it's almost funny.

xhibit911

PostSun Aug 10, 2008 10:27 am » by xhibit911



Conspirator
Posts: 1544
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:36 pm

PostSun Aug 10, 2008 4:26 pm » by Truthseeker


is this still a threat to you if you fly around the usa :idea:
Electronically Hijacking the WTC Attack Aircraft
By Joe Vialls, October 2001

On Sept. 10 2001, just 24 hours before the WTC attack, The Washington Times ran an article quoting intelligence sources who described Israel’s Mossad as “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” Moreover, they said, it was generally known in the intelligence community that the Mossad had penetrated every Muslim organization and would have little problem in finding any number of fanatics to carry out a suicide mission in the belief they were serving Allah. Ed.

In the mid-seventies America faced a new and escalating crisis, with US commercial jets being hijacked for geopolitical reasons. Determined to gain the upper hand in this new form of aerial warfare, two American multinationals collaborated with the Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) on a project designed to facilitate the remote recovery of hijacked American aircraft. Brilliant both in concept and operation, “Home Run” (not its real code name) allowed specialist ground controllers to listen in to cockpit conversations on the target aircraft, then take absolute control of its computerized flight control system by remote means. From that point onwards, regardless of the wishes of the hijackers or flight deck crew, the hijacked aircraft could be recovered and landed automatically at an airport of choice, with no more difficulty than flying a radio-controlled model plane. The engineers had no idea that almost thirty years after its initial design, Home Run’s top secret computer codes would be broken, and the system used to facilitate direct ground control of the four aircraft used in the high-profile attacks on New York and Washington on 11th September 2001.

Before moving on to the New York and Washington attacks, we first need to look at the ways in which an aircraft is normally controlled by its pilot, because without this basic knowledge, Home Run would make no sense. In order to control an aircraft in three-dimensional space, the pilot uses the control yoke (joystick) in front of him, rudder pedals under his feet, and a bank of engine throttles located at his side. Without engine thrust the aircraft would not fly at all, so the throttles are largely self explanatory: For more speed or altitude increase throttle, for less speed or altitude decrease throttle.

In order to raise or lower the nose of the aircraft, the pilot pulls or pushes on the control yoke, which in turn raises or lowers the elevators on the horizontal tailplane. To bank the aircraft left or right, the pilot moves the control yoke to the left or right, which in turn operates the ailerons on the outer wings. Lastly, to turn left or right at low speed or “balance” turns at high speed, the pilot presses the left or right rudder pedals as required, which in turn move the rudder on the vertical stabilizer.

Back in the early days of flight, the control yoke and rudder pedals were connected to the various flight control surfaces by thin cables, meaning the pilot had direct physical control over every movement the aircraft made. This was no great problem for an average man flying a small biplane, but as aircraft grew ever bigger, heavier and faster over the years, the loadings on the control yoke and rudder pedals became huge, certainly well beyond the ability of a single pilot to handle unaided.

By the late fifties we were well into the age of hydraulics, where just like the power steering on your automobile, hydraulic rams were placed in line between the pilot’s control cables and each individual control surface. Now when the pilot moved the control yoke, the cables activated sensors, which in turn activated one or more hydraulic rams, which in turn moved one or more control surfaces. For the first time since Bleriot and the Wright brothers, pilots were of necessity being steadily distanced from direct control of their own aircraft.

When the multinationals and DARPA finally came on the scene in the mid-seventies, aircraft systems were even more advanced, with computers controlling onboard autopilots, which in turn were capable of controlling all of the onboard hydraulics. In combination these multiple different functions were now known as the “Flight Control System” or FCS, in turn integrated with sophisticated avionics capable of automatically landing the aircraft in zero visibility conditions. In summary, by the mid-seventies most of the large jets were capable of effectively navigating hundreds of miles and then making automatic landings at a selected airport in zero-zero fog conditions. All of this could be accomplished unaided, but in theory at least, still under the watchful eyes of the flight deck crews.

In order to make Home Run truly effective, it had to be completely integrated with all onboard systems, and this could only be accomplished with a new aircraft design, several of which were on the drawing boards at that time. Under cover of extreme secrecy, the multinationals and DARPA went ahead on this basis and built “back doors” into the new computer designs. There were two very obvious hard requirements at this stage, the first a primary control channel for use in taking over the flight control system and flying the aircraft back to an airfield of choice, and secondly a covert audio channel for monitoring flight deck conversations. Once the primary channel was activated, all aircraft functions came under direct ground control, permanently removing the hijackers and pilots from the control loop.

Remember here, this was not a system designed to “undermine” the authority of the flight crews, but was put in place as a “doomsday” device in the event the hijackers started to shoot passengers or crew members, possibly including the pilots. Using the perfectly reasonable assumption that hijackers only carry a limited number of bullets, and many aircraft nowadays carry in excess of 300 passengers, Home Run could be used to fly all of the survivors to a friendly airport for a safe auto landing. So the system started out in life for the very best of reasons, but finally fell prey to security leaks, and eventually to compromised computer codes. In light of recent high-profile CIA and FBI spying trials, these leaks and compromised codes should come as no great surprise to anyone.

Activating the primary Home Run channel proved to be easy. Most readers will have heard of a “transponder”, prominent in most news reports immediately following the attacks on New York and Washington. Technically a transponder is a combined radio transmitter and receiver which operates automatically, in this case relaying data between the four aircraft and air traffic control on the ground. The signals sent provide a unique “identity” for each aircraft, essential in crowded airspace to avoid mid-air collisions, and equally essential for Home Run controllers trying to lock onto the correct aircraft. Once it has located the correct aircraft, Home Run “piggy backs” a data transmission onto the transponder channel and takes direct control from the ground.

This explains why none of the aircraft sent a special “I have been hijacked” transponder code, despite multiple activation points on all four aircraft. Because the transponder frequency had already been piggy backed by Home Run, transmission of the special hijack code was rendered impossible. This was the first hard proof that the target aircraft had been hijacked electronically from the ground, rather than by [FBI-inspired] motley crews of Arabs toting penknives.

The Home Run listening device on the flight deck utilizes the cockpit microphones that normally feed the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR), one of two black boxes armored to withstand heavy impact and thereby later give investigators significant clues to why the aircraft crashed.

However, once hooked into Home Run, the CVRs are bypassed and voice transmissions are no longer recorded on the 30-minute endless loop recording tape. If Home Run is active for more than thirty minutes, there will therefore be no audible data on the Cockpit Voice Recorders. To date, crash investigators have recovered the CVRs from the Pentagon and Pittsburg aircraft, and publicly confirmed that both are completely blank. The only possible reason for this, is data capture by Home Run, providing the final hard proof that the attack aircraft were hijacked electronically from the ground, rather than by “Arab terrorists”.

Many readers might by now be indignant; convinced this is incorrect or misleading information because of “those telephone calls from the hijacked aircraft”. Which telephone calls exactly? There are no records of any such calls, and the emotional claptrap the media fed you in the aftermath of the attack was in all cases third-person. We had the media’s invisible “contact” at an airline who “said” a hostess called to report a hijacking, and we had a priest (?) who “said” he received a call from a man asking him in turn to call his wife and tell her he loved her. Presumably this man would have had his wife’s name filed in his cellphone, and faced with imminent death would have called her direct. The FAA helped out by claiming that it had “overheard” a heated argument from a cockpit where the radio transmit switch had been left in the “on” position. When push came to shove, the FAA was forced to retract, and admit that the mythical argument was not on the tapes at all.

Whether more information will be forthcoming about Home Run is unknown, but nowadays there are large numbers of people apart from the author privy to the basic data. As long ago as the early nineties, a major European flag carrier acquired the information and was seriously alarmed that one of its own aircraft might be “rescued” by the Americans without its authority. Accordingly, this flag carrier completely stripped the American flight control computers out of its entire fleet, and replaced them with a home grown version. These aircraft are now effectively impregnable to penetration by Home Run, but that is more than can be said for the American aircraft fleet. A casual count indicates around 600 aircraft in the USA and elsewhere are still vulnerable and could be used in further attacks at any time, which might help explain why America has lately been bombing the Afghans primarily with bags of wheat. For the first time in US history, American officials appear to be genuinely fearful of future reprisals, and justifiably so with 600 giant bombs parked on the wrong side of their missile defence shield.

It is a “Catch 22” situation. In order to make all of the aircraft safe, the flight control systems would have to be stripped out and replaced, at a cost of billions of dollars the airlines cannot afford because they are going broke. Nor is there enough time. The most innovative anti-hijacking tool in the American arsenal, has now become the biggest known threat to American national security.

For the purpose of public reassurance I would like to publish a complete list of aircraft which cannot be affected by Home Run, but I cannot do so for legal reasons. Any aircraft manufacturer not on the list might feel inclined to sue me for defamation and I can’t afford that. However, there is nothing to stop me publishing my personal choice of aircraft for a flight from, say, Atlanta to Singapore via JFK, Frankfurt, and Kuala Lumpur.

From Atlanta to JFK I would probably travel on a Boeing 737, and connect with a Boeing 777 for the onward flight to Frankfurt. At Frankfurt I would probably board an Airbus A340 for Kuala Lumpur, and finish the journey to Singapore on a DC9 or a Fokker 100. Naturally I might be unlucky enough to pick an aircraft with an intoxicated pilot, or an unrelated mechanical problem, but apart from those minor risks I’d feel pretty safe.


Joe Vialls is a former member of the Society of Licensed Aeronautical Engineers and Technologists, London.
if this is still there then you must watch what your going to fly with around america :evil:

Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:11 am

PostWed Aug 20, 2008 9:01 pm » by Danimami


Hello,

I am new at this forum and just wanted to share this article. I just found it on Snopes.
It includes an e-mail that circulated back in 2007 about Aviv and says that the information is difficult to classify as "true" or "false". Here's the link (I couldn't copy and paste the information). Hope it helps.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/soapbox/juvalaviv.asp

Initiate
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 2:27 am

PostWed Aug 20, 2008 11:50 pm » by Brothers


Well if I may add my two cents into this. If and only if there is a terrorist attack at the scale that is mentioned in the U.S. you can be very sure that an attack on Iran will be very swift. If I was Iran, then I would make sure that this attack doesn't happen for their own good.

Writer
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:30 am

PostSat Aug 23, 2008 9:16 am » by Comeonwtf9


Well, it kind of depends upon what one means by "9/11 wasn't faked"; this could mean many different things, but I really couldn't care less.

Anyways, the scenario which is described seems plausible, so I'd advise telling people around you about the possibility (keyword "possibility", not that it's going to happen) ahead of time, so that, if it does happen, you'll have a little more credibility as to what you have to say about what's going on.

Though, Project Camelot has been a victim of disinfo before, and continues to be in some cases (i.e. Dan Burisch and Project Serpo), so I honestly have no idea what to think about this based upon how little info exists. :?

Conspirator
Posts: 1544
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:36 pm

PostFri Sep 26, 2008 10:36 pm » by Truthseeker


Bush prepares another September 11 terror act to transform America into dictatorship
Front page / World / Americas
11.09.2007 Source:


Pages: 12

A former Reagan official has issued a public warning that the Bush administration is preparing to orchestrate a staged terrorist attack in the United States, transform the country into a dictatorship and launch a war with Iran within a year.



Bush prepares another September 11 terror act to transform America into dictatorship


BREAKING NEWS

Venezuela challenges the USA as it purchases Russian weapons


Ukraine angers Russia with its intention to join NATO


Hypocritical West stands up against Russia




US photographer wants nude pictures of Marilyn Monroe back
More...


Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, blasted Thursday a new Executive Order, released July 17, allowing the White House to seize the assets of anyone who interferes with its Iraq policies and giving the government expanded police powers to exercise control in the country.

Roberts, who spoke on the Thom Hartmann radio program, said: "When Bush exercises this authority [under the new Executive Order], there's no check to it. So it really is a form of total, absolute, one-man rule."

"The American people don't really understand the danger that they face," Roberts said, adding that the so-called neoconservatives intended to use a renewal of the fight against terrorism to rally the American people around the fading Republican Party.

Old-line Republicans like Roberts have become increasingly disenchanted with the neoconservative politics of the Bush administration, which they see as a betrayal of fundamental conservative values.

According to a July 9-11 survey by Ipsos, an international public opinion research company, President Bush and the Republicans can claim a mere 31 percent approval rating for their handling of the Iraq war and 38 percent for their foreign policy in general, including terrorism.

"The administration figures themselves and prominent Republican propagandists ... are preparing us for another 9/11 event or series of events," he said. "You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda is not going to do it, it is going to be orchestrated."

Roberts suggested that in the absence of a massive popular outcry, only the federal bureaucracy and perhaps the military could put constraints on Bush's current drive for a fully-fledged dictatorship.

"They may have had enough. They may not go along with it," he said.

The radio interview was a follow-up to Robert's latest column, in which he warned that "unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the U.S. could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran."

Roberts, who has been dubbed the "Father of Reaganomics" and has recently gained popularity for his strong opposition to the Bush administration and the Iraq War, regularly contributes articles to Creators Syndicate, an independent distributor of comic strips and syndicated columns for daily newspapers, RIA Novosti reports.

Today we can come across a large number of different theories of World Trade Center collapse. The following is one of the latest and most interesting.



Bush prepares another September 11 terror act to transform America into dictatorship


BREAKING NEWS

Venezuela challenges the USA as it purchases Russian weapons


Ukraine angers Russia with its intention to join NATO


Hypocritical West stands up against Russia




US photographer wants nude pictures of Marilyn Monroe back
More...


Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training and experience.

In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore found ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside "experts"... and, quite willing to, "go along" with the collective myth that has unfolded: that "the buildings failed structurally due to the aircraft impacts and resulting fires".

After all, we saw the aircraft slam into the building, the resulting huge fireball, and the ensuing "collapses".

There is however a growing body of very solid evidence regarding these "collapses" that has emerged in the last couple of years - gaining ground even in the mainstream media. This new evidence casts grave doubt upon the theories of the 9/11 building collapse "experts" as well as the official reports by the 9/11 Commission, FEMA, and NIST.

It lays out a solid convincing case which architects & engineers will readily see: that the 3 WTC high-rise buildings were destroyed by both classic and novel forms of controlled demolition.

Click here to watch video "WTC Building #7 and Twin Towers – Controlled Demolitions?"

After all, if in fact these buildings were professionally demolished with explosives, and since it takes months of planning and engineering to place the explosives, and since these buildings were highly secure from the likes of terrorists, then we are presented with a horrible conclusion that we can not deny: that this entire event could only have been planned and orchestrated by some element(s) within the U.S. Government, ae911truth.org reports.

Source: agencies


Prepared by Alexander Timoshik
Pravda.ru


Join Pravda.ru forum. Registration is free and simple



  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook