Noah's Ark,the Global Flood,and the Ararat Anomaly REAL?!

Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:33 pm » by **Lowsix**

The Ark of the Covenant and Noahs Ark are to very different items..

The last ictured item, has been thoroughly studied, and was revealed NOT to be the Ark, but rather a natural formation.

Turkish, American and British Scientists have all verified this fact.
There is iron Ore dust at the site, but no traces of wood, or nails or anything..
The iron was also found to have natural origins.

Here are three other formations found by the Turkish Air Force..showing the same exact characteristics.

Baumgartner was known for his wild stories and speculation , and every single claim he made about Truckloads of wood, iron and bronze nails, wooden Crossbeams have al ben satisfactorily explained.

Here is an overview of the studies conducted and theirconclusions on that particular Rock Formation, and the misinformation still being spread about it, despite having been thoroughly debunked in the late 70's..First by the Turks themselves, and then verified by British and Americans. The following Link prvides an EXHAUSTIVE summary of every single claim and its resultant discovered fact..and it is entirely convincing by any measure.

Bummed me out too..

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i4/report.asp#ark5

Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:01 pm » by **Marduk2012**

Nice add-on to the thread, Low .But, could it be that http://www.answersingenesis.org/creatio ... t.asp#ark5 is a creationist website?!

_______________________

Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:21 pm » by **Lowsix**

Highly possible, but they are drawng that information from MANY publically available,
and secular sources..

Just happened to be that today, without the time to dig all around the net, and hand-compose all of the sources which ive read..and documented here before..
I used that site becuase it was all self contained.

If the site itself gives you doubt, (cant blame you , i dont like creation sites either..unless, i knw the information to hvae come from elsewhere) But i think you probably know i wouldnt shovel shit on your shoes though...

i encourage you to Google Dr. John Baumgartner, Dr. WIlliam Shea and Dr. David fasold + Ararat + ARK, and look into the many available refutations available..

This site was mainly disputing that site, on the basis that the SIZE did not match the biblical proportions..

Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:34 pm » by **Marduk2012**

Dont worry Low, I know what you mean...in the end we must check all sources availible ...even if its only for photos. We have to stir in the shit and read between the frakkin lines if we want disclosure!

________________

Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:50 pm » by **Lowsix**

All that said..
I dont know a damn thing about the site first mentioned in your awesome post..

and please understand, Im not knocking the posts..or posters when i add my two bits..
Your stuff has all been super detailed and well put together..and we all really appreciate that, instead of the hit and run one liners..

so thanks!

Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:07 am » by **Marduk2012**

LowSix wrote:All that said..
I dont know a damn thing about the site first mentioned in your awesome post..

and please understand, Im not knocking the posts..or posters when i add my two bits..
Your stuff has all been super detailed and well put together..and we all really appreciate that, instead of the hit and run one liners..

so thanks!

Low, post everthing you got keep it goin in any Thread of mine... I need all your supplementary geist.

__________________