My slant on 9/11 has just increased exponentially..........

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for US military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as has been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.

A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.

a. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order):

Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.

Land friendly Cubans in uniform "over-the-fence" to stage attack on base.

Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.

Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).[13]

Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.

Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).

Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.

Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.

Capture militia group which storms the base.

Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires—napthalene.

Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be in lieu of (10)).

b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.
c. Commence large scale United States military operations.

Wow, huge ginormous Logical error in operation on this one.

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc.
"after this, therefore because (on account) of this""

Northwoods in no way "proves" a thing about 9/11.
I didnt say it didnt heavily suggest it..
Im saying it doesnt prove it.

thanks for the clarification....

Everyone, please, let me clear something up. Northwood doesn't prove 9/11.


You many continue to peruse the website.

to me it is not a question of "was this the pre-plan for 9/11?"

to me this shows that the government are corrupt, careless, and heartless to even think up something like this, regardless of how old it is you can sure as well see that some of the same old shit bags are in office...

so to me it heavily suggest that we had the planning, resources, media and agenda to go as far as to implement some kid of false flag attack, so it actually gives me a clearer insight to let me know they would have done it , and could have done it.

then BAM!!!! a few decades later

9/11

false-flag

invasion

over-turn of leader and hunting an invisible boogey man.

strong coincidence that they would think of something miraculous and not use it to see if it works.