Without hesitation I divided 666 by 22 (= main code to decipher the Dresden Codex) which resulted in 30.272727 - Where is his work on the deciphering of the dresden codex? Have any scholars looked over his work to verify it?
Why number 22? and;
I knew that a bit of 87.4545 days correlated with 3.363636 circles of the equator’s field of the sun
3.36366? Then he just decides to multiply it by 9 to make it equal 30.272727 ? Why 9? and why 3.36 circles of the equators field of the sun? Why not 1, or 2 or 65?
Suddenly, I had a brainwave. Five deviating cycles symbolized by the number 666 appear in a
sunspot cycle of 187.2 years. Dividing 187.2 by 5 results in the average period between these
deviations: 187.5 : 5 = 37.44 years. Multiplying this number by 100 results in a well-known Maya
number! Yes Patrick, you have a brainwave, well done old chap! You just keep pushing squares thru circles until they fit.
Funnily enough. His solar flare predictions have gone off track so he's now moved onto planetary alignments and earthquake predictions, these have also failed. I don't believe there's any mention of planetary alighnments in any of his books. This guy just keeps clutching at straws.
Anyhow we'll know soon enough if he's the prophet of doom or a retard.
- Related topics
- Last post