Pheonix Lights flares

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1418
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:13 pm
Location: London, England

You might like:

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 4:28 pm » by Abyssdnb


Proof that the "lights" drift down and out of sight behind the Mountains.

[youtube]<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dAljVczVFmU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_GB&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dAljVczVFmU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_GB&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>[/youtube]
Image "Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it."

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 443
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:37 pm

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 4:57 pm » by Nervousnjerky


Yes this is the definative investigation into the flares . Proves beyond a dought that this ,seen buy thousands, was flares. It is less than half the story. This entire situation is a perfect example of the Gov. phucking up a disinfo campaign. Including Fifes later admitance to being one of the "silly citizens" buy admitting his "Seeing one" as well. Only thing remaining is. Was it blackops or alien? IMO.
Perspective is everything.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=50236871

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 1541
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 2:45 am

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 5:48 pm » by Wolfbane7272


perhaps it clears the air on thsi particular video which has been admitted someone accidently and i use that term loosely dropped flares , but it does not take into account the multitude of witnesses that saw an actual craft not lights
Image

Image

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 3601
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:01 pm

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 6:06 pm » by Zegtelzegtel


1997

1:38

Image
I hope that this site is not infiltrated by dis info agents, but one can not be sure that it isn't, if no one here can prove otherwise. Lisakitty
Nulklear War...In Just Weeks. eeeeeee

Writer
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:21 pm

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 7:22 pm » by gukala


I remember this - the military initially denied it - then they gave some official report that didn't explain much. This video proves there were flares being fired off, but it has never explained the delta-wing ufos that were seen earlier in the evening. Maybe there was another project going on, so they put on a flares mission in order to obstruct and obscure some x-project which was sighted earlier in the evening.

My opinion - they are all a bunch of liars - it takes very little to prove that
But proving the ufo activity was anything - they got that pretty much wrapped up
not much we can prove

Conspirator
User avatar
Posts: 5854
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:39 am

PostFri Mar 26, 2010 7:37 pm » by E6722maj


people often say it would take a ufo landing on the whitehouse lawn to make people accept the ufos reality. even that would fail. the government, then the media, would say 'no they didn't' and the people would say, 'ok guess we were mistaken'. the phoenix incident was not flares. :alien:
to insanity - and beyond!

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 443
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:37 pm

PostSat Mar 27, 2010 4:19 am » by Nervousnjerky


gukala wrote:I remember this - the military initially denied it - then they gave some official report that didn't explain much. This video proves there were flares being fired off, but it has never explained the delta-wing ufos that were seen earlier in the evening. Maybe there was another project going on, so they put on a flares mission in order to obstruct and obscure some x-project which was sighted earlier in the evening.

My opinion - they are all a bunch of liars - it takes very little to prove that
But proving the ufo activity was anything - they got that pretty much wrapped up
not much we can prove

Yes the real incident took place for 2 hrs across a state line and many counties I believe . Lasted for 2 hours and ended 2 hours b4 the 10:00pm or so flare release.
Perspective is everything.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=50236871

jetxvii

PostSat Mar 27, 2010 4:31 am » by jetxvii


well I only have one question from watching this video and I have seen this video before.
( and I have always questioned this particular video, but not the "real" phoenix lights)

Who is to say that is disappeared behind the mountain? are we to accept that they just fizzled out and not think that they possibly could have just kept cruising but you the viewer can't see it because it is behind the mountain?

are there eyewitness account on the other side of that mountain because if there is then that would put into question the official flare story, also if there were residents around that mountain area wouldn't they have known if a small fleet or even a few aircraft were present dropping flares?

there is no question that they are being hidden by the mountains I am just wondering those things.

Initiate
User avatar
Posts: 443
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:37 pm

PostSat Mar 27, 2010 4:48 am » by Nervousnjerky


jetxvii wrote:well I only have one question from watching this video and I have seen this video before.
( and I have always questioned this particular video, but not the "real" phoenix lights)

Who is to say that is disappeared behind the mountain? are we to accept that they just fizzled out and not think that they possibly could have just kept cruising but you the viewer can't see it because it is behind the mountain?

are there eyewitness account on the other side of that mountain because if there is then that would put into question the official flare story, also if there were residents around that mountain area wouldn't they have known if a small fleet or even a few aircraft were present dropping flares?

there is no question that they are being hidden by the mountains I am just wondering those things.

I think behind the mountain is military training land. So no witnesses from there as I recall. It was from there the one A10 was flying that dropped the flairs. The point of the experiment was to establish that the flares were in fact falling behind the range and not just extinguishing buy them selves.
Perspective is everything.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=50236871

jetxvii

PostSat Mar 27, 2010 6:05 am » by jetxvii


nervousnjerky wrote:
jetxvii wrote:well I only have one question from watching this video and I have seen this video before.
( and I have always questioned this particular video, but not the "real" phoenix lights)

Who is to say that is disappeared behind the mountain? are we to accept that they just fizzled out and not think that they possibly could have just kept cruising but you the viewer can't see it because it is behind the mountain?

are there eyewitness account on the other side of that mountain because if there is then that would put into question the official flare story, also if there were residents around that mountain area wouldn't they have known if a small fleet or even a few aircraft were present dropping flares?

there is no question that they are being hidden by the mountains I am just wondering those things.

I think behind the mountain is military training land. So no witnesses from there as I recall. It was from there the one A10 was flying that dropped the flairs. The point of the experiment was to establish that the flares were in fact falling behind the range and not just extinguishing buy them selves.


Oh I know what the military said they did, but just for the sake of argument you could easily say that they told you that to cover for it actually being a UFO.

If it really was a UFO it could have just flown past the mountain line and that would be a good excuse for the military to use it as a flare dissipation story, instead of an Alien craft that flew past the eyewitness visual mountain line, either way there is more footage out and footage even before this one that show the same if not identical lights that aren't flares, I think 2008 and 2009 they had the same sightings.

but they were more than likely flares, but still doesn't put that question I asked out of question either.

Next
  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

We are listed at the www.topparanormalsites.com website. Click here to vote for us.. Thank you :-)