Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post a reply

:
In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed into the text field underneath.
Smilies
:pray: :sleep: :D :alien51: :) :mrgreen: :wink: :love: :obsessed: :| :( :twisted: :evil: :scary: :o :dunno: :? 8-) :hmmm: :shock: :flop: :top: :x :P :oops: :cry: :?: :idea: :arrow: :!: :nails: :look: :rtft: :roll: :ohno: :hell: :vomit: :lol: :think: :headscratch: :clapper: :bang; :censored: :badair: :help: :owned: :nope: :nwo: :geek: :ugeek: :robot: :alien: :mrcool: :ghost: :sunny: :peep: :yell: :banana: :dancing: :hugging: :bullshit: :cheers: :shooting: :hiho:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by Nickelson » Tue May 04, 2010 10:20 am

I am just the messenger on this one. The question I have on this and which remains unanswered.

E.T. is alien but than again, do we have E.T. or Alien DNA to compare this data with?

I never read such data, which was clearly confirmed.


We found some particles on parts of meteorites which crashed on Earth, but I never saw confirmation it was DNA.

So this article smells out loud and I am only trying to gather facts on this one.

So I am not offended in anyway.

I'm not finding any evidence on this elsewhere so I am an open minded sceptic in this case.

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by Allreadydead » Tue May 04, 2010 9:41 am

@reinaul posted:

Persistent Evidence of a Jovian Mass Solar Companion in the Oort Cloud

John J. Matese, Daniel P. Whitmire
(Submitted on 26 Apr 2010)

We present an updated dynamical and statistical analysis of outer Oort cloud cometary evidence suggesting the sun has a wide-binary Jovian mass companion. The results support a conjecture that there exists a companion of mass ~ 1-4 M_Jup orbiting in the innermost region of the outer Oort cloud. Our most restrictive prediction is that the orientation angles of the orbit normal in galactic coordinates are centered on the galactic longitude of the ascending node Omega = 319 degree and the galactic inclination i = 103 degree (or the opposite direction) with an uncertainty in the normal direction subtending ~ 2% of the sky. A Bayesian statistical analysis suggests that the probability of the companion hypothesis is comparable to or greater than the probability of the null hypothesis of a statistical fluke. Such a companion could also have produced the detached Kuiper Belt object Sedna. The putative companion could be easily detected by the recently launched Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE).

Comments: 41 pages, 9 figures, submitted to ICARUS
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:1004.4584v1 [astro-ph.EP]


:think:


Eh :?: Reinaul, sorry about this, but I'm not a astrophysicist, shit! I struggle to understand Sessme Street, so what does it actually mean?, please, in a simple language for me to understand and maybe I can then reply? (if my tiny brain can grasp the mathematics of Quantium physics, astrophysics, statistical hypothesis, astrological inclinations and mean planet deteriminations, not forgetting all that conjecture about the Outer Oort Cloud...)

Or does it mean that these scientist's believe there is a second sun contained within our planetary system?

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by Cassiopeia » Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:43 pm

in the 70's a man who claimed to be visited by the pleiadians http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tSHhi_0cMY

this is the documentary about him


in his pictures of the females they looked surprisingly similar--people made fun of him because the hair styles were all 70's but that modern picture posted shows that may just be a coincidence because nowadays most women have side parts and the pics seem to stick to a simple natural part.

I'm not going to post a pic of myself but the similarities between the pic and the girls in myfamily is kinda creepy...wonder if somewhere down the line my ancestors did some aliens =D

big green eyes/blue eyes (NATURAL) blonde hair , medium nose that isn't straight and narrow but rounded and bow shaped lips

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by Nickelson » Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:12 pm

svaha wrote:
nickelson wrote:
drjones wrote:I apologise,the link is there and works fine....just to add i do not trust this research.


Well question I have about this research. How can they say it is alien? Therefore they need to have a reference, so they must have found alien DNA before?

I only trust it when I read it in some scientific journal, but till now I haven't found any and I don't know this journal very well.


They don't say it's alien, but extraterrestrial.
There is a difference here, even today comets / astroids bring forms of life through the galaxy.


E.T. is alien :headscratch: but than again, do we have E.T. or Alien DNA to compare this data with?

I never read such data, which was clearly confirmed.

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by Svaha » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:03 pm

nickelson wrote:
drjones wrote:I apologise,the link is there and works fine....just to add i do not trust this research.


Well question I have about this research. How can they say it is alien? Therefore they need to have a reference, so they must have found alien DNA before?

I only trust it when I read it in some scientific journal, but till now I haven't found any and I don't know this journal very well.


They don't say it's alien, but extraterrestrial.
There is a difference here, even today comets / astroids bring forms of life through the galaxy.

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by Reinaul » Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:48 pm

Persistent Evidence of a Jovian Mass Solar Companion in the Oort Cloud

John J. Matese, Daniel P. Whitmire
(Submitted on 26 Apr 2010)

We present an updated dynamical and statistical analysis of outer Oort cloud cometary evidence suggesting the sun has a wide-binary Jovian mass companion. The results support a conjecture that there exists a companion of mass ~ 1-4 M_Jup orbiting in the innermost region of the outer Oort cloud. Our most restrictive prediction is that the orientation angles of the orbit normal in galactic coordinates are centered on the galactic longitude of the ascending node Omega = 319 degree and the galactic inclination i = 103 degree (or the opposite direction) with an uncertainty in the normal direction subtending ~ 2% of the sky. A Bayesian statistical analysis suggests that the probability of the companion hypothesis is comparable to or greater than the probability of the null hypothesis of a statistical fluke. Such a companion could also have produced the detached Kuiper Belt object Sedna. The putative companion could be easily detected by the recently launched Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE).

Comments: 41 pages, 9 figures, submitted to ICARUS
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:1004.4584v1 [astro-ph.EP]


:think:

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by Drjones » Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:41 pm

alexrubic wrote:Sorry to be a wet blanket but this sounds like nonsense to me!

Dr Francis Crick's biography does not paint the sort of scientist who would conclude:
Extraterrestrial origins in the Human Genome, in relation to his well renown DNA research.

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/F ... 01340.html

Indeed when it came to the metaphysical he was much more sceptical:
After suggesting that it would become possible for people to wonder if a computer might be programmed so as to have a soul, he wondered: at what point during biological evolution did the first organism have a soul? At what moment does a baby get a soul? Crick stated his view that the idea of a non-material soul that could enter a body and then persist after death is just that, an imagined idea. For Crick, the mind is a product of physical brain activity and the brain had evolved by natural means over millions of years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Crick

He is also on record as saying:
Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection, Gregor Mendel’s genetics and knowledge of the molecular basis of genetics, when combined, revealed the secret of life.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Crick

This does not sound like the kind of scientist that would conclude human DNA is extraterrestrial in origin. As for the exobiologists finding evidence of ET DNA, as someone has already pointed out, how would they know unless they already have verified samples of alien DNA on record?!


That was my initial impression aswell m8...nonsense.

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by Alexrubic » Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:47 pm

Sorry to be a wet blanket but this sounds like nonsense to me!

Dr Francis Crick's biography does not paint the sort of scientist who would conclude:
Extraterrestrial origins in the Human Genome, in relation to his well renown DNA research.

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/F ... 01340.html

Indeed when it came to the metaphysical he was much more sceptical:
After suggesting that it would become possible for people to wonder if a computer might be programmed so as to have a soul, he wondered: at what point during biological evolution did the first organism have a soul? At what moment does a baby get a soul? Crick stated his view that the idea of a non-material soul that could enter a body and then persist after death is just that, an imagined idea. For Crick, the mind is a product of physical brain activity and the brain had evolved by natural means over millions of years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Crick

He is also on record as saying:
Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection, Gregor Mendel’s genetics and knowledge of the molecular basis of genetics, when combined, revealed the secret of life.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Crick

This does not sound like the kind of scientist that would conclude human DNA is extraterrestrial in origin. As for the exobiologists finding evidence of ET DNA, as someone has already pointed out, how would they know unless they already have verified samples of alien DNA on record?!

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by TheDuck » Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:12 pm

chronicnerd wrote:Yep us "loonies"... is right...

So, let's just review through this shall we?

Against all odds and great scientific "badgering" of those who thought our system had either a 12th planet and/or was a binary system:
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=33991
Oh...wow...we have a binary system...huh...that's funny...
Hey, wait, wasn't there another culture that was like super old and talked about this kind of stuff?
http://www.michaelsheiser.com/nibirupage.htm
==========================================================
Nibiru as Referring to an Astronomical Body

The following chart represents a complete listing of the word “nibiru” in astronomical texts and/or astronomical contexts. If one wants to know what Nibiru as an astronomical body is - according to the Mesopotamians - one is dependent on these texts, unless, like Zecharia Sitchin, one makes up meanings to prop up a theory. One either lets the texts tell you what Nibiru is, or one willfully ignores the scribes in favor of Sitchin. I have, in these cases, given (a) the Mesopotamian text where the word occurs; (b) a Sumero-Akkadian transliteration; (c) a brief translation; (d) the page references to English translations of the Mesopotamian text in which the word occurs, so the reader can check the context and study further. (Note as well that in Section Three I discuss each occurrence in more detail and in context). In the following chart, several features of Sumerian-Akkadian transliteration[9] bear explaining - and they are important:

[*] superscripted “d” = the cuneiform sign for “god” (Dingir), and so “neberu” may refer to a god (recall that Sumerians and Mesopotamians associated heavenly bodies with deities)
[*] superscripted “MUL” = the cuneiform sign for “star” (and so “neberu” is a star – the texts tell us this point blank)
[*] subscripted numbers = the numerical reference number for Sumerian signs that can stand for more than one syllable. This is a scholarly convention for keeping such overlapping signs distinct so the texts can be read accurately.

==========================================================

Wow, that is odd...the Sumerians had written about this some 3000+ years ago (as well as the Mayan culture too)


Upload to Disclose.tv



At this point in time, whatever is done (if all of this coupled with the Sumerian, Mayan, Egyptian, etc translations/findings) it is going to be too late if indeed we find out that the "Gods" are not friendly. If they are...then hey...no worries... if they are not...

Well... what do you think "human nature" would dictate as a reaction to "aliens coming down from the heavens" to take resources from our planet forcefully?

Based on our world wide governments and how they "disregard" the "majority's" desire/wishes in regards to what they should or should not do, how do you think the world governments would react?

At this point, we are almost halfway through 2010...which leaves us roughly 1.5-2.0 years before all of this comes to a head.

How prepared are you and how prepared do you think each government is to handle such things?

Exciting that some of what we have been hunting down to find the "truth" is becoming fact as opposed to speculation, and while it is all cool and such...what now? The disinformation has been so abundant and so common, the "general" masses used to eating their fast food, getting their smokes at the local corner store, and watching their "favorite" TV programs...will probably think it is still "not true"...

Well, eventually each person has a choice to make regarding what they spend their money on for the next couple of years.

What are you going to spend your money on?


Rice, beans etc... :lol:

Re: Scientists confirm Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA

Post by Chronicnerd » Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:06 pm

Yep us "loonies"... is right...

So, let's just review through this shall we?

Against all odds and great scientific "badgering" of those who thought our system had either a 12th planet and/or was a binary system:
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=33991
Oh...wow...we have a binary system...huh...that's funny...
Hey, wait, wasn't there another culture that was like super old and talked about this kind of stuff?
http://www.michaelsheiser.com/nibirupage.htm
==========================================================
Nibiru as Referring to an Astronomical Body

The following chart represents a complete listing of the word “nibiru” in astronomical texts and/or astronomical contexts. If one wants to know what Nibiru as an astronomical body is - according to the Mesopotamians - one is dependent on these texts, unless, like Zecharia Sitchin, one makes up meanings to prop up a theory. One either lets the texts tell you what Nibiru is, or one willfully ignores the scribes in favor of Sitchin. I have, in these cases, given (a) the Mesopotamian text where the word occurs; (b) a Sumero-Akkadian transliteration; (c) a brief translation; (d) the page references to English translations of the Mesopotamian text in which the word occurs, so the reader can check the context and study further. (Note as well that in Section Three I discuss each occurrence in more detail and in context). In the following chart, several features of Sumerian-Akkadian transliteration[9] bear explaining - and they are important:

[*] superscripted “d” = the cuneiform sign for “god” (Dingir), and so “neberu” may refer to a god (recall that Sumerians and Mesopotamians associated heavenly bodies with deities)
[*] superscripted “MUL” = the cuneiform sign for “star” (and so “neberu” is a star – the texts tell us this point blank)
[*] subscripted numbers = the numerical reference number for Sumerian signs that can stand for more than one syllable. This is a scholarly convention for keeping such overlapping signs distinct so the texts can be read accurately.

==========================================================

Wow, that is odd...the Sumerians had written about this some 3000+ years ago (as well as the Mayan culture too)


Upload to Disclose.tv



At this point in time, whatever is done (if all of this coupled with the Sumerian, Mayan, Egyptian, etc translations/findings) it is going to be too late if indeed we find out that the "Gods" are not friendly. If they are...then hey...no worries... if they are not...

Well... what do you think "human nature" would dictate as a reaction to "aliens coming down from the heavens" to take resources from our planet forcefully?

Based on our world wide governments and how they "disregard" the "majority's" desire/wishes in regards to what they should or should not do, how do you think the world governments would react?

At this point, we are almost halfway through 2010...which leaves us roughly 1.5-2.0 years before all of this comes to a head.

How prepared are you and how prepared do you think each government is to handle such things?

Exciting that some of what we have been hunting down to find the "truth" is becoming fact as opposed to speculation, and while it is all cool and such...what now? The disinformation has been so abundant and so common, the "general" masses used to eating their fast food, getting their smokes at the local corner store, and watching their "favorite" TV programs...will probably think it is still "not true"...

Well, eventually each person has a choice to make regarding what they spend their money on for the next couple of years.

What are you going to spend your money on?

Top

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook