Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post a reply

:
In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed into the text field underneath.
Smilies
:pray: :sleep: :D :alien51: :) :mrgreen: :wink: :love: :obsessed: :| :( :twisted: :evil: :scary: :o :dunno: :? 8-) :hmmm: :shock: :flop: :top: :x :P :oops: :cry: :?: :idea: :arrow: :!: :nails: :look: :rtft: :roll: :ohno: :hell: :vomit: :lol: :think: :headscratch: :clapper: :bang; :censored: :badair: :help: :owned: :nope: :nwo: :geek: :ugeek: :robot: :alien: :mrcool: :ghost: :sunny: :peep: :yell: :banana: :dancing: :hugging: :bullshit: :cheers: :shooting: :hiho:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by Slith » Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:49 pm

Yikes

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by Canubis » Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:13 pm

think about it? the US just Blew a quoter up? for water? or what?

THINK DTV THINK!!

light is light now and n not what is perceived , no rover needed...? never has been.. HAARP will agree..

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by Constabul » Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:49 am

Image

(Phys.org) —Scientists using data from the lunar-orbiting twins of NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission are gaining new insight into how the face of the moon received its rugged good looks. A report on the asymmetric distribution of lunar impact basins is published in this week's edition of the journal Science.

"Since time immemorial, humanity has looked up and wondered what made the man in the moon," said Maria Zuber, GRAIL principal investigator from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. "We know the dark splotches are large, lava-filled, impact basins that were created by asteroid impacts about four billion years ago. GRAIL data indicate that both the near side and the far side of the moon were bombarded by similarly large impactors, but they reacted to them much differently."

Understanding lunar impact basins has been hampered by the simple fact that there is a lack of consensus on their size. Most of the largest impact basins on the near side of the moon (the moon's face) have been filled with lava flows, which hide important clues about the shape of the land that could be used for determining their dimensions. The GRAIL mission measured the internal structure of the moon in unprecedented detail for nine months in 2012. With the data, GRAIL scientists have redefined the sizes of massive impact basins on the moon.

Maps of crustal thickness generated by GRAIL revealed more large impact basins on the near-side hemisphere of the moon than on the far side. How could this be if both hemispheres were, as widely believed, on the receiving end of the same number of impacts?

Scientists have long known that the temperatures of the near-side hemisphere of the moon were higher than those on the far side: the abundances of the heat producing elements uranium and thorium are higher on the near side than the far side, and as a consequence, the vast majority of volcanic eruptions occurred on the moon's near-side hemisphere.

Image

"Impact simulations indicate that impacts into a hot, thin crust representative of the early moon's near-side hemisphere would have produced basins with as much as twice the diameter as similar impacts into cooler crust, which is indicative of early conditions on the moon's far-side hemisphere," notes lead author Katarina Miljkovic of the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris.

The new GRAIL research is also helping redefine the concept of the late heavy bombardment, a proposed spike in the rate of crater creation by impacts about 4 billion years ago. The late heavy bombardment is based largely on the ages of large near-side impact basins that are either within, or adjacent to the dark, lava-filled basins, or lunar maria, named Oceanus Procellarum and Mare Imbrium. However, the special composition of the material on and below the surface of the near side implies that the temperatures beneath this region were not representative of the moon as a whole at the time of the late heavy bombardment. The difference in the temperature profiles would have caused scientists to overestimate the magnitude of the basin-forming impact bombardment. Work by GRAIL scientists supports the hypothesis that the size distribution of impact basins on the far-side hemisphere of the moon is a more accurate indicator of the impact history of the inner solar system than those on the near side.


Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-11-grail-miss ... n.html#jCp

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by Terry72763 » Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:41 am

Image[/quote]

Wow an Aerial photo of the Arizona, Sea of Tranquility. Again how do we "KNOW" that photo "IS" the Moon and not some place we "KNOW" they created to look like the moon? and if they did the HOAX there it would need no special acts to get this picture and POSE it as the Moon. Again there is "No" Telescope big enough on the "Earth" to see the Flag on the Moon. Below is an answer to just that question
http://www.telescopes.com/telescopes/ca ... rticle.cfm

That is from a Telescope Specializing Page. however that also may have been edited by Nasa(DOD)

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by Terry72763 » Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:24 am

Good Question NEM...
The Answer is Russia Did. And Twice!
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/tank-on-the-moon/
OR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrFp-qJcymI In [HD] (FULL)

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by Newearthman » Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:32 am

Harbin wrote:Because it rips things up.

Image


That's some...

Image

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by pushtone » Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:40 am

get a tear in your Space Suit - dont worry ...... just call costume :wink:


Upload to Disclose.tv

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by Harbin » Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:01 am

Because it rips things up.

Image

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by The57ironman » Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:26 pm

Mydogma wrote:bottom line is there is no way the ptb are human...as they lack ALL sense of humanity...

.

...one of my favorite mantras.. :flop:


.

Re: Why is there no Rover on the Moon?

Post by Mydogma » Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:42 pm

Newearthman wrote:Think about this...When our world leaders say they have no knowledge of alien lifeforms maybe they are telling the truth in the sense that all these "aliens" have been here long before us and thus making them terrestrial.


Yep or possibly the fact that they are not aware of alien life forms OTHER then themselves...haha...whoops i have digressed to the reptilian thing...bottom line is there is no way the ptb are human...as they lack ALL sense of humanity...

Top

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook