Wes Penre To those of you who are going to read Supriem Rockefeller, Book 2, I want to give you just a few hints of what I mean when I say it's not a good source of material if you wish to know who Supriem is:
The book is mainly trying to expose SDR as a conman, who has been convicted of at least one crime in the past and has murky business deals going on. It also wanted to prove that his birth name is Kristopher Raynes and that Larry Raynes is his father.
1. Supriem was never convicted of a crime. Look at the document "Tom" was able to dig up, saying SDR robbed his employer of $$. After have read it carefully and you still think he's been convicted of a crime, then use dictionary.com and look up every single word you don't know the definition of. It took me a while to find out that he was never convicted. I realized that he would never offer One Million Dollars to someone who could prove he was convicted of a crime, if he really was. He is not stupid.
Did he steal the money? Probably, but that doesn't make him a hoax. Not to justify it by any means, but many people have done weird things in their younger years...
So why did he do it? If you read Book 1 again, it may dawn to the reader why he had a "modest upbringing".
2. We were able to track down his ties to the Raynes family. When SDR was born, ON WINTER SOLSTICE 1974(!!!) - coincidence? -, his mother, Barbara, was married to a Larry Raynes, so it was natural that Supriem got the name Kristopher RAYNES after his step-dad. Yes, step-dad. Nowhere could we prove without any doubts that Larry Raynes is his father, only that he grew up in the Raynes/Lehman family. Supriem has emphasized that Larry is his step-dad, and that is just as true as saying he is his father. Neither has been proven.
3. Look at the business connections exposed in the book, the documents provided and the conclusions we made. Murky business deals? Looks like it, but the evidence has only been able to take us so far. What does it prove? Again, documents, two people (Tom and I) making conclusions and publish them. Does this make SDR a hoax? No.
So what in the book makes him a hoax? Nothing in book 2 can be pointed out, showing "this is what makes him a hoaxer or a conman that has nothing to do with any global agenda". If we want to, we can make a conclusion that he is - it's up to us, but that will only be conclusions which are not based on facts. Realize that there are games within games within games. There is one thing happening on the surface and that's all there is until we start digging. A few feet deeper there's a whole new reality and eventually -- oops! The Earth is hollow??? And what's in the center of that?
Just an analogy, but nevertheless... what I'm saying is that for me, the only value of book 2 is that I've come to the above realizations. I have more questions now than I had before I wrote it and these questions have nothing to do with business deals or whether he's a Raynes of not. And it's not that I can start editing the book, either, because the whole approach is wrong. I should have written it, but not published it. The latter was the mistake.
Becks (and I'm sure other people too) wanted me to explain the fallacy of the book, and I decided this morning that - ok, I'll do that then. And this is it.
Because I wrote the book, I feel responsibility. That's why I don't wanted it online anymore. Still, I realize that it's going to stay online no matter what I think, so at least I've separated myself from the validity of the book by posting this, and there is now written confirmation that I, as the co-author, don't support its context.
And again, I strongly suggest that those who are interested in this whole story at least skim through Book 1 again (but hopefully read the whole thing again): http://supriemrockefeller.wordpress.com/
because you will find quite a different book from the one I published in June 2009. It's matured a lot, and can also be downloaded in pdf.
As a starter, read Chapter VII, sub-title: "Being Multiple Deities in One — How it Works" : http://supriemrockefeller.wordpress.com ... /chapter7/
. That explains the Lucifer/Marduk issue from another perspective, for those who had a hard time putting that part together (I was one of them).
Becks, would you mind posting this whole thing as-is on DTV? If you do, that's a great favor!! Thank you all. Love, Wes