MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post a reply

:
In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed into the text field underneath.
Smilies
:pray: :sleep: :D :alien51: :) :mrgreen: :wink: :love: :obsessed: :| :( :twisted: :evil: :scary: :o :dunno: :? 8-) :hmmm: :shock: :flop: :top: :x :P :oops: :cry: :?: :idea: :arrow: :!: :nails: :look: :rtft: :roll: :ohno: :hell: :vomit: :lol: :think: :headscratch: :clapper: :bang; :censored: :badair: :help: :owned: :nope: :nwo: :geek: :ugeek: :robot: :alien: :mrcool: :ghost: :sunny: :peep: :yell: :banana: :dancing: :hugging: :bullshit: :cheers: :shooting: :hiho:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Germanpils » Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:07 am

fliegezeug wrote:In the absence of data on the topography of the site, is difficult to establish a well-based theory. (Create a 3D model of the scene, with sunlight and the resulting shadows)
Considering that the line of sight is perpendicular to the ground, tall structures appear only with the dimensions of its horizontal section.
So, the theory in
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/3103/towercopy.png
is not correct. Sorry.
What about this image below?
I'm not affirming that is a tower, a rock or an inhabitant of the moon enjoying the view.
I'm just pointing out what appears to be the source of the shadow.
Image

I'm sorry to say it to you germanpils, but the line you traced over the image is not aligned with the shadow.
One error of a Half degree can cause miles of difference for long distances.



wow never thought anyone would dig out this topic again :P

anyway, i dont know what the surface looks like since its overlayed in shadow.
if its going deep down the hill it could be a tower reaching out of the shadow.
if not, then hell ;)

anyway i still got a small or huge backup, if i am right, recently i watched another version of footage of
"Pythagoras", a different angle where you can see a straight grey/white line
going up ON a "going up(!?)" hill,

still have to figure that out, since its a few days ago i watched it.
will post it after work today :)

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Boondox681 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:17 am

i fuckin hate nasa.'luckily',we have the japanese to thank for these crappy pics.did anyone see savwafair2012's post with the mars pics?and this is all we get from the moon?all lies.i can't wait for nibiru,peace

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Fliegezeug » Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 am

In the absence of data on the topography of the site, is difficult to establish a well-based theory. (Create a 3D model of the scene, with sunlight and the resulting shadows)
Considering that the line of sight is perpendicular to the ground, tall structures appear only with the dimensions of its horizontal section.
So, the theory in
http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/3103/towercopy.png
is not correct. Sorry.
What about this image below?
I'm not affirming that is a tower, a rock or an inhabitant of the moon enjoying the view.
I'm just pointing out what appears to be the source of the shadow.
Image

I'm sorry to say it to you germanpils, but the line you traced over the image is not aligned with the shadow.
One error of a Half degree can cause miles of difference for long distances.

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Spock » Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:31 am

LowSix wrote:
germanpils wrote:ahh now i see what you mean, but have you read page2?

one guy also tried that, it was a rock up on the cliff, and i proved him wrong

with just a long enhancement of the shadow :)

What do you think of that?



Image


That entire argument hinges on KNOWING the difference of height between left side flat surface, and where the shadow falls...

What i can tell for sure, is that the rim of the valley sits way higher than the ground on which the shadow is being cast...which fits my Clay observations perfectly.

Image


Party Foul using a wacom tablet. Plus, I can't believe you right your lower case "a" like that.

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Lowsix » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:29 pm

germanpils wrote:ahh now i see what you mean, but have you read page2?

one guy also tried that, it was a rock up on the cliff, and i proved him wrong

with just a long enhancement of the shadow :)

What do you think of that?



Image


That entire argument hinges on KNOWING the difference of height between left side flat surface, and where the shadow falls...

What i can tell for sure, is that the rim of the valley sits way higher than the ground on which the shadow is being cast...which fits my Clay observations perfectly.

Image

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Germanpils » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:16 pm

ahh now i see what you mean, but have you read page2?

one guy also tried that, it was a rock up on the cliff, and i proved him wrong

with just a long enhancement of the shadow :)

What do you think of that?



Image

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Lowsix » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:12 pm

Hopefull that helps.
Again, all semi-educated speculation on my part.

Image

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Germanpils » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:03 pm

LowSix wrote:
germanpils wrote:and just by the way, a little edit

the thing you called rock, what rock would be that high to reach out of that deep shadow,
and causing this long tube like shadow, a constant shadow thats not turning thin at the end?

and your right, i also thought about it, this "rock" you call it, could be the actual tower
reaching out of the shadow.


I think this use of Levels sheds some light ont hat question.

possibly.

Image




My apologies, but i dont understand this right :P

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Germanpils » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:22 pm

LowSix wrote:
germanpils wrote:Man Low, your one of the best here on this forum sharing the spot with Pindz,
you both do a great job here, you both dont only look at a picture and say
garbage, you both look for details.

and i really appreciate your post.

and i agree with the most part of it.

i understand you logical thinking about the 0-20° sun spot...
but if the sun was that low shining to the moon, wouldnt this hill,
that one guy here called a pyramid, show a more round, and not that really edgy
shadow? just because of the angle the sun shines this area?

in my logical thinking it would cause a more round shadow on that hill with the angle
of 1-20°.

:cheers:

gotta love discussing with people who think logically :)


Youve been one of the more sincere posters and question askers, so i did feel it was important to actually give those photos some time..out of respect. Ans i eally appreciate your comments. I think you get why im here. I still got wonder...for sure. But i got a little knowledge that actually does occasionally shine some light on stuff.. I dont debunk to be a dick. I want me some aliens too. Badly.

Had i been in your shoes, i might have just had a heart attack before being able to analyze anything..i thought that one was THAT hard to debunk.

On your question about the roundness of the shadow.

One of the things i used to determine what sort of shadow would be cast, was by going to my wifes clay studio, and doing a SUUUUPER simple fast quick experiment by sticking a glass bead into the side of a small faked clay 'hill' and then shining lights onto it....(of course i realize now i should have taken photos, but didnt have camera, and that clay is now a Bowl that will feed the homeless)...

BUT..

what it showed me, was that UNDER 20º..like around 10...the shadow was spikelike and EASILY long enough to account for the 'rock on a hill' explanation. And it really was almost exactly spikelike.. And since we cant tell the height of the various craters receiving light, we cant determine an exact angle of sun, BUT, a simple mockup showed that the angle had to be pretty low..and combine that with the fact if the ground receiving the spike shadow was angled down and away from the lightsource, the shadow would double in length for every 10º degrees it was inclined ...and the shadow became sharper and sharper as the lightsource moved away..

Overall, since we cannot determine ABSOLUTELY that you did not mark the actual spire..

This one says in the Hmm...wtf pile.

Great work man..and great eyes.



:cheers: :cheers: :cheers:

I do keep my eyes on - damn it - every shadow or anything...

but i think this tower spot is the only big thing, i just think there is not much more...

maybe NASA just blurred out the rest, and this guy said 99,01% is blurred out,
and I found this 0,99% that NASA didnt notice.

The details are just hard to analyze, but i will do whatever my eyes show me, for sure.

And I will keep this thread up with evidence that people cant deny

Re: MIND BENDING STUNNING EVIDENCE!!!

Post by Lowsix » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:17 pm

germanpils wrote:and just by the way, a little edit

the thing you called rock, what rock would be that high to reach out of that deep shadow,
and causing this long tube like shadow, a constant shadow thats not turning thin at the end?

and your right, i also thought about it, this "rock" you call it, could be the actual tower
reaching out of the shadow.


I think this use of Levels sheds some light ont hat question.

possibly.

Image

Top

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook