Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post a reply

:
In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed into the text field underneath.
Smilies
:pray: :sleep: :D :alien51: :) :mrgreen: :wink: :love: :obsessed: :| :( :twisted: :evil: :scary: :o :dunno: :? 8-) :hmmm: :shock: :flop: :top: :x :P :oops: :cry: :?: :idea: :arrow: :!: :nails: :look: :rtft: :roll: :ohno: :hell: :vomit: :lol: :think: :headscratch: :clapper: :bang; :censored: :badair: :help: :owned: :nope: :nwo: :geek: :ugeek: :robot: :alien: :mrcool: :ghost: :sunny: :peep: :yell: :banana: :dancing: :hugging: :bullshit: :cheers: :shooting: :hiho:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by Crunchy » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:32 pm

the57ironman wrote:one thing i got , from punjedi , was the incredible amount of time it takes to do this kind of work...

hence , most fakes don't last more than a minute or so... :mrcool:

:cheers:


yep agree 100% unless you own a massive bank of cpus to do the rendering like
pixar this stuff can take hours to render just a few minutes of video ... not forgetting the hours of work it takes to edit and create the models as well.

i gave up playing around with after fx ect purly due to the time it takes ....
im currently running a quad core cpu but even that can barly cope with 60 sec of footage using the rotobrush .... but within a few weeks im upgrading to an 8core cpu and 64gb ram so i may dabble with after fx again as i have lots of 1080p footage that needs professional level editing that my current editor just cant do (vegas pro 10), but im not going to waist my time creating fake ufo videos thats for sure.

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by Opalserpent » Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:50 pm

people uploading fake ufo videos should be banished to youtube.

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by The57ironman » Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:27 pm

one thing i got , from punjedi , was the incredible amount of time it takes to do this kind of work...

hence , most fakes don't last more than a minute or so... :mrcool:

:cheers:

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by Troll2rocks » Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:09 pm

It is 100% real :flop:

No just kidding, its 100% After FX plugin hoaxry

To my eye poorly done too, there are much better ones out there, these kind of people help kill the credibility of genuine reports from official sectors. Thankfully the mentality and skill set of those who usually fake them, come nowhere near to their ambitions to trick and deceive.

You can forget about any video ever having any weight behind it (even if genuine and proven so) because the sheer amount of sophisticated fakes and those duped by them is staggering. It would have to come from official sources to be taken seriously and even given any time, by academics worth their weight.

It is a pointless venture outside of official sources now, and it is the average Joe's fault because of shit like this.

No offence to the OP, I thank you for posting it. However it is 100% faked, and the jump stability pin pointing they did awful.

Thanks for posting though :cheers:

@Dom, I would have to say yes it was faked because of the noticeable stability adjustment issues the object had where the program they used was unable to map the trajectory correctly. Not to mention the grain over the object and the mismatched lighting and basic texture mapping used. :peep:

Wait what ? :o You faked it ? :hell:

:lol:

:cheers:

:peep:

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by domdabears » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:57 pm

What if I filmed this?
I don't know anything at all about CGI or photoshop or anything like that.

Would you still say it's a fake?

100% honest about the cgi and photoshop. And if I could prove I have no software like that.

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by Niji666 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:54 pm

Experts are saying it's one of the best CGI's ever seen, but it's not surprising with today's technology and the editing software getting better by the day.
Take the special effect Movie's for example. They only use computer software like me and you to make amazing effects, but they have experts in their field using the software.

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by Will69ease » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:44 pm

domdabears wrote:I know everything that there is to know about anything.

It's fake.

No it's real.

Actually it's fake.

On second thought it's real.

But then again it could be fake.

How about it's real and fake.

Or it's fake and real.

OK, it's been confirmed to be a youtube video.

Yes, it's a youtube video.

They got the logo and everything right on it. How did I miss that?

So to answer your guy's questions, this is a youtube video.

Now we can all sleep tonight.

Thank God you are here to clear these things up. :lol:

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by domdabears » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:41 pm

I know everything that there is to know about anything.

It's fake.

No it's real.

Actually it's fake.

On second thought it's real.

But then again it could be fake.

How about it's real and fake.

Or it's fake and real.

OK, it's been confirmed to be a youtube video.

Yes, it's a youtube video.

They got the logo and everything right on it. How did I miss that?

So to answer your guy's questions, this is a youtube video.

Now we can all sleep tonight.

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by Germanpils » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:33 pm

i dont buy it. looks soo cgi

Re: Possible one of the best ufo fakes, or not?

Post by Will69ease » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:21 pm

stevestv65 wrote:Check out this in the uk mirror newspaper today,

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news ... ash-737426

it looks a bit fake to me
:alien: :alien51: :nope:

Top

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook