Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena

Post a reply

:
In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed into the text field underneath.
Smilies
:pray: :sleep: :D :alien51: :) :mrgreen: :wink: :love: :obsessed: :| :( :twisted: :evil: :scary: :o :dunno: :? 8-) :hmmm: :shock: :flop: :top: :x :P :oops: :cry: :?: :idea: :arrow: :!: :nails: :look: :rtft: :roll: :ohno: :hell: :vomit: :lol: :think: :headscratch: :clapper: :bang; :censored: :badair: :help: :owned: :nope: :nwo: :geek: :ugeek: :robot: :alien: :mrcool: :ghost: :sunny: :peep: :yell: :banana: :dancing: :hugging: :bullshit: :cheers: :shooting: :hiho:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena

Re: Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena

Post by Truthdefender » Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:34 pm

Five Arguments Against the Extraterrestrial
Origin of Unidentified Flying Objects

JACQUES F. VALLEE




Abstract-Scientific opinion has generally followed public opinion in the
belief that unidentified flying objects either do not exist (the "natural phenomena
hypothesis") or, if they do, must represent evidence of a visitation
by some advanced race of space travellers (the extraterrestrial hypothesis or
"ETH"). It is the view of the author that research on UFOs need not be
restricted to these two alternatives. On the contrary, the accumulated data
base exhibits several patterns tending to indicate that UFOs are real, represent
a previously unrecognized phenomenon, and that the facts do not
support the common concept of "space visitors." Five specific arguments
articulated here contradict the ETH: (1) unexplained close encounters are
far more numerous than required for any physical survey of the earth; (2)
the humanoid body structure of the alleged "aliens" is not likely to have
originated on another planet and is not biologically adapted to space travel;
(3) the reported behavior in thousands of abduction reports contradicts the
hypothesis of genetic or scientific experimentation on humans by an advanced
race; (4) the extension of the phenomenon throughout recorded
human history demonstrates that UFOs are not a contemporary phenomenon;
and (5) the apparent ability of UFOs to manipulate space and time
suggests radically different and richer alternatives, three of which are proposed
in outline form as a conclusion to this paper.
(whole article here)
http://www.scientificexploration.org/jo ... llee_2.pdf

Re: Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena

Post by Cornbread714 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:30 pm

Cool, I can't wait to watch this. I'm already in the middle of the 50's UFO movie that someone else posted.

And I should be working actually... :peep:

Re: Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena

Post by Ghost32 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:29 pm

Great Post!

I like how he basically talks about Project Blue Beam. When he describes the scenario of the submarine projecting the Image of Christ over Cuba as a method of Psychological Warfare.

Re: Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena

Post by Spock » Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:28 pm

Re: Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena

Post by Spock » Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:25 pm


Upload to Disclose.tv



:mrgreen:
Guarantee this guy thinks he's got it all figured out.

Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena

Post by Spock » Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:05 pm

My favorite UFOlogist...


Upload to Disclose.tv


Top

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook