This Internet provider pledges to put your privacy first

Post a reply

To prevent automatic submissions, please verify that you are not a robot.
:pray: :sleep: :D :alien51: :) :mrgreen: :wink: :love: :obsessed: :| :( :twisted: :evil: :scary: :o :dunno: :? 8-) :hmmm: :shock: :flop: :top: :x :P :oops: :cry: :?: :idea: :arrow: :!: :nails: :look: :rtft: :roll: :ohno: :hell: :vomit: :lol: :think: :headscratch: :clapper: :bang; :censored: :badair: :help: :owned: :nope: :nwo: :geek: :ugeek: :robot: :alien: :mrcool: :ghost: :sunny: :peep: :yell: :banana: :dancing: :hugging: :bullshit: :cheers: :shooting: :hiho:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review

Expand view Topic review: This Internet provider pledges to put your privacy first

Re: This Internet provider pledges to put your privacy first

Post by Hackjames » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:58 am

I believe that this guy is ahead of the curve. There will be problems of course, but the internet will have its say and I can't see it being anything but positive. The internet wins all conflicts.

He's not replacing the telcoms any time soon, and he specifically might not do it at all, but it is going to happen. In the meantime, Mr. Merrill...shut up and take my money!

EDIT: Oh...

Re: This Internet provider pledges to put your privacy first

Post by domdabears » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:20 am

By any chance do you know which states have these regulations?

Re: This Internet provider pledges to put your privacy first

Post by Eldorado » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:17 am

Fucking Super Cool.........glad to hear that he's going forward...

but he's gonna have an even bigger time in certain states that have regulations on tellecom networks.....

here, in Burlington, there are two existing companies....Fair Point, and the local attempt at the same thing he's doing........called Burlington Tellecom. They are trying to fight eachother over territory, and each has a mandated area of town that they are allowed to offer services in........

this town is in control over it all.....they wanted to give all the residents an option, a local "independent" tellecom service, so they decided to create a corporate destabilization effort through "investing" 17 million of the city's budget, without a vote, or even telling the city's 39,000 residents that they were going to do so.............they created the company and laid fiber optic networks, only to declare bankruptcy in two years after opening, and they have gone default on the loan, not having paid the bank back anything in over a year, and they are ready to liquidate the company, and make the city pay back the rest!!!!

To top it off, they got sued by Fair Point, so the city couldn't mandate that Fair Point leaves (under the pseudo-socialist anti-corporation ethic that the city "believes" in) and the only decision they could agree to is to allow each company to offer services in half of the city......imagine trying to create competitive markets and govern over monopoly, to then decide to create a regional monopoly for each company to exploit.

That's burlington for you

Re: This Internet provider pledges to put your privacy first

Post by domdabears » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:01 am

I will be getting it as soon as it goes public.

This Internet provider pledges to put your privacy first

Post by domdabears » Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:49 am

Step aside, AT&T and Verizon. A new privacy-protecting Internet service and telephone provider still in the planning stages could become the ACLU's dream and the FBI's worst nightmare.


Nicholas Merrill is planning to revolutionize online privacy with a concept as simple as it is ingenious: a telecommunications provider designed from its inception to shield its customers from surveillance.

Merrill, 39, who previously ran a New York-based Internet provider, told CNET that he's raising funds to launch a national "non-profit telecommunications provider dedicated to privacy, using ubiquitous encryption" that will sell mobile phone service and, for as little as $20 a month, Internet connectivity.

The ISP would not merely employ every technological means at its disposal, including encryption and limited logging, to protect its customers. It would also -- and in practice this is likely more important -- challenge government surveillance demands of dubious legality or constitutionality.

A decade of revelations has underlined the intimate relationship between many telecommunications companies and Washington officialdom. Leading providers including AT&T and Verizon handed billions of customer telephone records to the National Security Agency; only Qwest refused to participate. Verizon turned over customer data to the FBI without court orders. An AT&T whistleblower accused the company of illegally opening its network to the NSA, a practice that the U.S. Congress retroactively made legal in 2008.

By contrast, Merrill says his ISP, to be run by a non-profit called the Calyx Institute with for-profit subsidiaries, will put customers first. "Calyx will use all legal and technical means available to protect the privacy and integrity of user data," he says.

Merrill is in the unique position of being the first ISP exec to fight back against the Patriot Act's expanded police powers -- and win.

In February 2004, the FBI sent Merrill a secret "national security letter" (not an actual court order signed by a judge) asking for confidential information about his customers and forbidding him from disclosing the letter's existence. He enlisted the ACLU to fight the gag order, and won. A federal judge barred the FBI from invoking that portion of the law, ruling it was "an "unconstitutional prior restraint of speech in violation of the First Amendment."

Merrill's identity was kept confidential for years as the litigation continued. In 2007, the Washington Post published his anonymous op-ed which said: "I resent being conscripted as a secret informer for the government," especially because "I have doubts about the legitimacy of the underlying investigation." He wasn't able to discuss his case publicly until 2010.

His recipe for Calyx was inspired by those six years of interminable legal wrangling with the Feds: Take wireless service like that offered by Clear, which began selling 4G WiMAX broadband in 2009. Inject end-to-end encryption for Web browsing. Add e-mail that's stored in encrypted form, so even Calyx can't read it after it arrives. Wrap all of this up into an easy-to-use package and sell it for competitive prices, ideally around $20 a month without data caps, though perhaps prepaid for a full year.

"The idea that we are working on is to not be capable of complying" with requests from the FBI for stored e-mail and similar demands, Merrill says.

More... ... st-always/