"...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post a reply

:
In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you enter both of the words displayed into the text field underneath.
Smilies
:pray: :sleep: :D :alien51: :) :mrgreen: :wink: :love: :obsessed: :| :( :twisted: :evil: :scary: :o :dunno: :? 8-) :hmmm: :shock: :flop: :top: :x :P :oops: :cry: :?: :idea: :arrow: :!: :nails: :look: :rtft: :roll: :ohno: :hell: :vomit: :lol: :think: :headscratch: :clapper: :bang; :censored: :badair: :help: :owned: :nope: :nwo: :geek: :ugeek: :robot: :alien: :mrcool: :ghost: :sunny: :peep: :yell: :banana: :dancing: :hugging: :bullshit: :cheers: :shooting: :hiho:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by TheDuck » Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:01 am

Harbin wrote:When posted initially in October, it was about paid shills on the internet in general, not here. The conversation turned to here, but shills around here tend to not stay, because nobody seems to care.

As to my previous comment, it was sarcastic. [sarc tag ommited] oops.


Sound man, you're definitely right about them leaving because dem peeps around here not be caring lol

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by Harbin » Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:30 am

When posted initially in October, it was about paid shills on the internet in general, not here. The conversation turned to here, but shills around here tend to not stay, because nobody seems to care.

As to my previous comment, it was sarcastic. [sarc tag ommited] oops.

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by TheDuck » Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:10 am

Harbin wrote:
knewpeace wrote:
Poooooot wrote:So at least three people have said in this thread that there have been known "shills" here, on dtv, but no one is offering up any names. What's up with that?



because it's easy for mods to edit peoples post like mine have been in the past.


I know what you mean man. That Vulcan is always editing my posts and that habit has rubbed of on the metal one too.

It's too much, very oppressive around here.


Really?

I haven't read this thread but someone name a shill and supply ANY evidence at all.

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by mediasorcery » Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:07 am

i feel a big fat fukin who cares comin on in this thread.

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by ZetaRediculous » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:39 am

Harbin wrote:
We KNOW who you are !


Upload to Disclose.tv



Really? :think:

Wow, if that's true I'll paypal you £10 if you can give post the three initials of my real name and the month I was born in...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :alien51: :alien51: :alien51: :lol: :lol: :alien51: :badair:

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by Harbin » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:20 am

ZetaRediculous wrote:
Spock wrote:Because it's easy to make an accusation against anyone. So many times if someone says something that someone disagrees with, then one will call the other a shill or accuse them of being a paid agenda poster. It's rediculous.


What you trying to say???

Was that some veiled attempt to out me? :lol: :lol:


We KNOW who you are !


Upload to Disclose.tv

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by Lucidlemondrop » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:16 am

The57ironman wrote:
Lowsix wrote:lol

Noetic, the 187 year old, strikes again!

.


...... :lol: ....we were just sayin' that...


.[/quote]


WE????

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by ZetaRediculous » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:13 am

Spock wrote:Because it's easy to make an accusation against anyone. So many times if someone says something that someone disagrees with, then one will call the other a shill or accuse them of being a paid agenda poster. It's rediculous.


What you trying to say???

Was that some veiled attempt to out me? :lol: :lol:

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by The57ironman » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:12 am

Lowsix wrote:lol

Noetic, the 187 year old, strikes again!

.


...... :lol: ....we were just sayin' that...


.

Re: "...It also had quite detailed info on the moderators...

Post by Harbin » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:11 am

Cornbread714 wrote:Or maybe you're just a dick.



Image

Top

Visit Disclose.tv on Facebook